Trumps National Emergency To Save Lives !

Actually it is a national emergency, not having a wall is costing many people their very lives, because nothing stops them from crossing in the middle of the desert, so they are dying on the American side.

The democrats are cruel for not wanting to save lives by stopping it, it is Trump and the Republicans that are compassionate in wanting to enforce the laws of the land that actually save people lives, just like police enforce traffic laws to stop fools from killing themselves and possibly those driving in their vehicles with then.

PBS REPORT

Excerpt

The states that share a border with Mexico — Texas, Arizona, California and New Mexico — see a stream of migrants who enter the country through the desert.....It’s unclear how many people die in the process, or exactly how many of their bodies are found by law enforcement agencies and individuals. But in Pima County alone, officials have 2,816 recovered remains — defined as both skeletal and fully fleshed bodies of undocumented migrants — since 2000, according to a 2017 report by the county medical examiner’s office. Last year, the country recovered 128 remains.

The wall is like a red light in traffic designed to keep people safe, from oncoming traffic, run it and break the law and risk injury and harm to you and those with you.

More logic and less politics tinged with irrational emotions is needed on this topic.

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

I Agree . I Also Agree that Our Federal Laws MUST be Obeyed by ALL Americans Including those on the Left who Obviously Despise them .

Consider how many counties share the border with Mexico; I'd venture the number of dead is in the tens of thousands died trying to cross through inhospitable terrain. Is that not a crisis? I've also read that more than 50,000 Americans have died due to murder and drunk driving by illegal aliens. it doesn't matter what your attitude towards them is, far too many people are dying thanks to our porous border situation.

It makes one wonder why some people doesn't want the wall.

So you're OK with criminals, rapists and terrorists crossing your border without permission?

So you're OK with human trafficking, drugs and guns going in and out every day, killing thousands if not millions of people in the butterfly effect.

See, I'm trying to understand what possible reasons you guys must have to follow these idiotics Democrats leaders, but I just can think in brainwashing manipulation.

That, or you're way dumber than you think. And I mean no offense with that, it's OK to be dumb, until you learn it. Now you have to act.

These are just statistics and facts.

The leftists are morally correct in wanting poor dead immigrants rotting in the deserts.

originally posted by: watchitburn
These are just statistics and facts.

The leftists are morally correct in wanting poor dead immigrants rotting in the deserts.

They'll STILL count their votes.

False, border security is important but doesn't require a barrier.

I should now, I'm a security expert and run a large security firm.

Every client I consult with I do not recommend any sort of perimeter fence or barrier. Granted I've never gotten a client because on the face of it a security plan that doesn't include a fence around a sensitive facility sounds asinine. I'm still committed to MY VISION of security.

P.S. Orange man bad.

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

2008... LOL

www.nytimes.com...

Illegal immigrants

Require those “living here illegally but otherwise playing by the rule” to “get right with the law.” Support a system that requires undocumented immigrants who are in good standing to pay a fine, pay taxes, learn English, and go to the back of the line for the opportunity to become citizens.

Border and port security

Support additional personnel, infrastructure, and technology on the border and at ports of entry. Increase the number Customs and Border Protection agents and equip them with “better technology and real-time intelligence.”

Employer verification

Crack down on employers who hire undocumented immigrants. Establish an employer verification system that is “accurate, fair to legal workers, safeguards people’s privacy, and cannot be used to discriminate against workers.”

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Hey, Comrade, take a chill pill.

Let's not have a dictator in chief who doesn't pay his own taxes.

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Make the path to citizenship faster, easier and cheaper, and they won’t have to sneak across the desert. If you aren’t in favor of that, then you are the ones who want them to die.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: watchitburn
These are just statistics and facts.

The leftists are morally correct in wanting poor dead immigrants rotting in the deserts.

They'll STILL count their votes.

Twice even.

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Make the path to citizenship faster, easier and cheaper, and they won’t have to sneak across the desert. If you aren’t in favor of that, then you are the ones who want them to die.

Agreed, also secure the border to stop illegal trafficking of drugs and children.

If you aren't for that, then I guess you support child suffering and sex trafficking??

I mean if you do then I guess that's a thing. I'm sure some people do, I don't.

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Exactly, because tunnels can not be dug, people can not climb, and drones do not exist. High tech border security would be more affective.

originally posted by: iplay1up2
a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Exactly, because tunnels can not be dug, people can not climb, and drones do not exist. High tech border security would be more affective.

That's what I tell my clients, but for some reason they still think a fence is a reasonable component of "security".

I'll convince some clients some day to go fenceless on a security contract, someday.

originally posted by: MisterSpock

originally posted by: iplay1up2
a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Exactly, because tunnels can not be dug, people can not climb, and drones do not exist. High tech border security would be more affective.

That's what I tell my clients, but for some reason they still think a fence is a reasonable component of "security".

I'll convince some clients some day to go fenceless on a security contract, someday.

I don't think there are thousands of people trying to get into your backyard.

My point is, tunnels will be dug, people will find easy ways to get over the wall, and drones can deliver drugs over a wall, in less than a Minute! A wall may inconvenience some, but they will find ways regularly.

originally posted by: iplay1up2

originally posted by: MisterSpock

originally posted by: iplay1up2
a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Exactly, because tunnels can not be dug, people can not climb, and drones do not exist. High tech border security would be more affective.

That's what I tell my clients, but for some reason they still think a fence is a reasonable component of "security".

I'll convince some clients some day to go fenceless on a security contract, someday.

I don't think there are thousands of people trying to get into your backyard.

My point is, tunnels will be dug, people will find easy ways to get over the wall, and drones can deliver drugs over a wall, in less than a Minute! A wall may inconvenience some, but they will find ways regularly.

You can dig a tunnel under a wall in under a minute?

Awesome, I'm sure all the manpower and equipment would be more noticeable doing that with a fence, then if you could just walk over the perimeter.

Also, it's not my backyard. I consult large research facilities both public and private, they seem to think they need walls to help in a multipoint(electronic, maned patrols and sadly fences) security plan.

I personally say they need just men and camera's, but they all seem to want walls too.

I think they are just being immoral.

originally posted by: MisterSpock

originally posted by: iplay1up2

originally posted by: MisterSpock

originally posted by: iplay1up2
a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Exactly, because tunnels can not be dug, people can not climb, and drones do not exist. High tech border security would be more affective.

That's what I tell my clients, but for some reason they still think a fence is a reasonable component of "security".

I'll convince some clients some day to go fenceless on a security contract, someday.

I don't think there are thousands of people trying to get into your backyard.

My point is, tunnels will be dug, people will find easy ways to get over the wall, and drones can deliver drugs over a wall, in less than a Minute! A wall may inconvenience some, but they will find ways regularly.

You can dig a tunnel under a wall in under a minute?

Awesome, I'm sure all the manpower and equipment would be more noticeable doing that with a fence, then if you could just walk over the perimeter.

Also, it's not my backyard. I consult large research facilities both public and private, they seem to think they need walls to help in a multipoint(electronic, maned patrols and sadly fences) security.

I personally say they need just men and camera's, but they all seem to want walls to.

I did not say "tunnels could be dug in under a minute" you need to check yourself. I said, "tunnels will be dug" the comment I made about, "under a minute" was referring to the FACT, a drone could easily deliver drugs over the wall in less than a minute!

Said some things, but nothing new, no declarations, nothing.

Bit of a let down after the hype.

P

a reply to: kaylaluv

I can agree with that, but they need to hold to a reasonable number that the country can absorb.
Not sure what that number should be, 1 million seems like a fair number.

originally posted by: pheonix358
Said some things, but nothing new, no declarations, nothing.

Bit of a let down after the hype.

P

My guess(and hope) is that this is his last olive branch(chance) to the dems.

I hope he meets with them, sets a deadline and then just goes ahead with having the construction completed as a matter of national security.

In the end, he's still smarter than chuck and nance, so I can't imagine he isn't still maneuvering them around in some way.