i think the 1969 moon landings were done in a movie studio

a reply to: neutronflux

Yeah.

Sarcasm can be problematic in this medium. But when it comes to Moon hoax types, it's as effective as anything else.

Which is, not at all.

a reply to: neutronflux

yeah - screw " reading comprehension " who needs that ???

un-subtle hint - its you

originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein
a reply to: neutronflux

Can you state actual evidence the moon landings were shot on the moon. Or just the same old arguments repeatedly debunked?

I can plenty of evidence including those big rockets they used to get there. Once you build the big rocket the rest is easy.

a reply to: ignorant_ape

Just how it goes sometimes.

Rules for effective communication.

9 BASIC RULES FOR EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

lacommunicationselonmartine.over-blog.com...


2-TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE QUALITY OF YOUR COMMUNICATION - Communication is a two way process that can be altered by one person transforming their participation.

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Ove38

ok - just for entertainment :

WHY do you believe manned lunar missions = impossible ?

The reason why they haven't done this 1969-2019

First of all it's dangerous. China is now preparing to land some insects and silkworms on the Moon, but not bring them back to Earth.

The idea that someone would try to land humans on the Moon, before landing and bringing back animals (mammals) to Earth, is ridicules.

www.cnbc.com...

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Ove38

ok - just for entertainment :

WHY do you believe manned lunar missions = impossible ?

The reason why they haven't done this 1969-2019

First of all it's dangerous. China is now preparing to land some insects and silkworms on the Moon, but not bring them back to Earth.

The idea that someone would try to land humans on the Moon, before landing and bringing back animals (mammals) to Earth, is ridicules.

www.cnbc.com...

Well, good thing Spain didn’t try landing a bunch of animals on the new world shores before Columbus.

Any who,

Good thing there where many unmanned landings before Apollo that took vital information.

en.m.wikipedia.org...

Unmanned landings

After the unsuccessful attempt by the Luna 1 to land on the Moon in 1959, the Soviet Union performed the first hard (unpowered) Moon landing later that same year with the Luna 2 spacecraft, a feat the U.S. duplicated in 1962 with Ranger 4. Since then, twelve Soviet and U.S. spacecraft have used braking rockets to make soft landings and perform scientific operations on the lunar surface, between 1966 and 1976. In 1966 the USSR accomplished the first soft landings and took the first pictures from the lunar surface during the Luna 9 and Luna 13 missions. The U.S. followed with five unmanned Surveyor soft landings.

The Soviet Union achieved the first unmanned lunar soil sample return with the Luna 16 probe on 24 September 1970. This was followed by Luna 20 and Luna 24 in 1972 and 1976, respectively. Following the failure at launch in 1969 of the first Lunokhod, Luna E-8 No.201, the Luna 17 and Luna 21 were successful unmanned lunar rover missions in 1970 and 1973.

Also, good thing there were many animal and human tests flights through space before Apollo.

And good thing both the Russians and USA did space walks before Apollo.

And a good thing NASA sent a specific Apollo mission to just circle the moon and back again before a moon landing.