Child appears to teleport into BBC News broadcast

Looks like someone thought this lady was going to (or did) say or do something that got bleeped out (5 second delay and all)

Also , most news stations use the same AP (or other's) taped footage
Or else the Enterprise is using children as the away team now

a reply to: oloufo

Lol, I'm not saying they all have to be in it, it's a need to know pyramid structure.
It's fine though you don't need to know

Damn kids today. Always teleporting around when the should just be walking. In my day, my mom wouldn't let me teleport anywhere, even to school when it was below zero. Spoiled is what they are.

Just the BBC manipulating footage again like they did in Syria with the supposed gas attack. nothing to see here... move along.

a reply to: MorpheusUSA

Bad editing. I don't see how the person who spliced that together was being anything other than lazy.(And disingenuous)
You can tell when she says "and how she's for... us." Her inflection changes in between "for" and "us" at the same time that the frame with the child appears. You can also see the same blending effect used at the same time when the woman's head moves.

originally posted by: MorpheusUSA
I was looking on Imgur this morning and found this little gem. I finally tracked down the twitter source.

The short clip is a street interview by the BBC asking a woman about May's leadership. In the frame you can see an individual walking away and then suddenly a kid just materializes out of nowhere and is walking away from the camera. I have to say if it’s not some type of quantum teleportation then the BBC as some mad editing skills.

Twitter

I assume that it was edited for some reason or the whole clip was created with CGI by the BBC and the street, people and the women interviewed is all ultra-high resolution computer graphics.

What you all think, Teleportation, CGI, matrix glitch, or is there a logical answer?

very simple editing. move the progress indicator slowly around that time and look at her face - it's obvious some part was cut and they made a smooth transition to make it less noticeable. side effect - the kid (being held by hand by some other person it seems) doesn't appear in a single frame and instead pulls a Harry Potter.

nothing to see here, move along.

no, really.

originally posted by: redmage
a reply to: TexasTruth

While it is clearly edited, what is your source to prove that the edit removed the word "not"?

Just a politically motivated assumption, or do you have evidence?

A teleporting child told me. It was weird.

Wow ATS, you have all really lost a step.

A child appears during an interview on a street in London and not one Harry Potter reference...

#ing Muggles.

a reply to: Thorneblood

Makes perfect sense.

a reply to: MorpheusUSA

Probably running away from the ghost of this fellow, to be honest.



As i hear he's still about where the BBC are concerned, at least in spirit.

a reply to: gortex

I had always just assumed the wizards were being transparent about the whole situation and it was the rest of us that were all like no it's just a book written by a broke single mom....

a reply to: oldcarpy

What, all the various news agencies that film the same protests/events etc from different angles and photographers' photos in newspapers - all showing the same thing and radio reports etc are faked?

Yes

Eyewitness accounts faked too? By whom, how and why?

Yes

actors

Please get a grip.

Ohhhhh hell no,

Ahem. Please read my post - I was referring to all the various news agencies that show the same event/s that you claim are faked, not that everything is faked. As in - how could that CGI possibly be coordinated by all these different agencies even for one so called protest or whatever.

You just made someone do something what seems like based on their claims they haven't done in a while


Think.


Its why you wont get a response to the question.