Anyone Care to Explain the Special Counsel in Light of Hillary's Emails?

Can someone please explain, as if to someone on the fence who may not know or understand all the facts, how the special counsel is handling the investigation into what was supposed to be Russian collusion (but is really open season on all known Trump associates with the apparent motto "any crime, any time") based on how the investigation into Hillary's emails was handled?

As for the Special Counsel, there have been multiple indictments - some of which have destroyed otherwise very honorable or reputable careers - but not a single link to the Kremlin. And no, www.themaven.net..." target="_blank" class="postlink">a Russian attorney with lose ties to Fusion GPS does not constitute collusion.

As for the Email "Interview", Immunity was handed out like a participation trophy and the majority of Hillary's written answers literally read "I do not recall". Everyone who had 1st hand knowledge and the potential to provide conclusive testimony was given a pass.

I am no attorney but maybe someone can shed some light.

How or Why would anyone be granted immunity if no crime was committed and no law broken?

www.politicususa.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Clinton Clean Says DOJ


How is it that immunity (x5) can be granted without a single conviction?

www.washingtonpost.com... epartment-staffer/2016/03/02/e421e39e-e0a0-11e5-9c36-e1902f6b6571_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.fd8ba8ed98d6" target="_blank" class="postlink">5th Amendment Against Self Incrimination

www.nytimes.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Evidence Destroyed (After Congressional Order to Preserve)

www.frontpagemag.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Purjury

dailycaller.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Immunity Participants


The investigation into Trump is still going on and apologies but I lack the motivation to list all the highlights so I defer to the ATS community to continue the thread. I know there are those here that I would disappoint if I tried anyhow...

a reply to: n0tsympl


Yes. The not so hidden war for power in politics.

The email scandal is one thing.

But what about the fact that the Clinton Campaign and the DNC colluded with several foreign governments and foreign sources against Trump ?

And another Member said why would all the fake Russian "collusion" exist if Trump and Putin were so close?

And why would that deal in Russia fall apart if those 2 were so close?

😎

a reply to: n0tsympl

I think the "immunities" were intentional and part of the game because they really thought Hillary would be President, and many who got "immunity" were set to be in the new "Administration.

😀

a reply to: n0tsympl

What you are asking is impossible to answer.
It will go down in history with all the other existential questions that humans have been asking since time began.
You know, kind of like these questions....Are UFOs real?....is Bigfoot real?
But just wait....soon we will be deluged by Leftists denying everything but.....TRUMP!

a reply to: n0tsympl

The answer is fairly simple. Our government is corrupt. Top down and is highly incentivized.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: n0tsympl

The answer is fairly simple. Our government is corrupt. Top down and is highly incentivized.

No they are not corrupt.
They are mentally ill with only greed and power on their minds. And, yes that leads to corruption.

a reply to: musicismagic

You stated exactly what corruption is by definition.

having or showing a willingness to act dishonestly in return for money or personal gain.

The Hillary email investigation was decided before it ever began. There would be no charges.

The Russia investigation is to take down a sitting president.


Big Difference.

Or ‘play to play’, the Uranium deal with ‘ze Russians’ where Hillary the fascist sold off The United States uranium resources in return for a huge ‘donation’ into the most corrupt ‘charity’ foundation on earth.

Which is ‘actual’ collusion by the way.

A person who can't recall that much should have never been allowed to run for president. Very simple..NO

The case is hinging on Cohen right now. His charges have nothing to do with the president. They are for tax fraud, etc. Look into his family and their Russian Mob ties. Taxi medallions are not cheap in NYC either.

Cohen is as credible as Whoppi is not racist.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: musicismagic

You stated exactly what corruption is by definition.

having or showing a willingness to act dishonestly in return for money or personal gain.

Thank you.
At least someone here reads my post of wisdom.

originally posted by: xuenchen
The email scandal is one thing.

But what about the fact that the Clinton Campaign and the DNC colluded with several foreign governments and foreign sources against Trump ?

And another Member said why would all the fake Russian "collusion" exist if Trump and Putin were so close?

And why would that deal in Russia fall apart if those 2 were so close?

😎

Arent you forgetting the FISA situation? The previous administration was the biggest offender!

As a person who has read the entirety of the IG report on the handling of the email fiasco. Occam's Razor must apply. The results of that are in the following prescient quote.

"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the US public believes is false."

a reply to: n0tsympl

into what was supposed to be Russian collusion (but is really open season on all known Trump associates with the apparent motto "any crime, any time")

It appears that you have already made up your mind and are now just looking for the team that agrees with you to accept you in.
Where ya been for the last ten years and what brings you back now?

a reply to: xuenchen

But what about the fact that the Clinton Campaign and the DNC colluded with several foreign governments and foreign sources against Trump ?

Keep saying it. Maybe you can get some people who actually count to believe you. Maybe not. LOL

The best you guys got this week of weeks is..... what about Hillary?

a reply to: RazorV66

Just sitting back and watching it all tumble down now.
Fun fun fun...

Two tier justice system. We all know it exists. Some people like to pretend it doesn't. I think that those people however actually know it does exist and they like to be on the side that holds the reigns. But most would switch sides if a different storm blew into town.

My idea is to totally reverse the situation where my side holds the reigns. I am not under any delusion that any of these power mad socialist have even an atom of "fairness" or "equality" in their bones. What they have is institutional power, and they have gotten so used to it that they aren't afraid to flaunt it.

There will be a day where the flaunting has to be quieted, but that day has yet to come - but indeed it will - because it always does.

originally posted by: n0tsympl
Can someone please explain, as if to someone on the fence who may not know or understand all the facts, how the special counsel is handling the investigation into what was supposed to be Russian collusion (but is really open season on all known Trump associates with the apparent motto "any crime, any time") based on how the investigation into Hillary's emails was handled?

As for the Special Counsel, there have been multiple indictments - some of which have destroyed otherwise very honorable or reputable careers - but not a single link to the Kremlin. And no, www.themaven.net..." target="_blank" class="postlink">a Russian attorney with lose ties to Fusion GPS does not constitute collusion.

As for the Email "Interview", Immunity was handed out like a participation trophy and the majority of Hillary's written answers literally read "I do not recall". Everyone who had 1st hand knowledge and the potential to provide conclusive testimony was given a pass.

I am no attorney but maybe someone can shed some light.

How or Why would anyone be granted immunity if no crime was committed and no law broken?

www.politicususa.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Clinton Clean Says DOJ


How is it that immunity (x5) can be granted without a single conviction?

www.washingtonpost.com... epartment-staffer/2016/03/02/e421e39e-e0a0-11e5-9c36-e1902f6b6571_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.fd8ba8ed98d6" target="_blank" class="postlink">5th Amendment Against Self Incrimination

www.nytimes.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Evidence Destroyed (After Congressional Order to Preserve)

www.frontpagemag.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Purjury

dailycaller.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Immunity Participants


The investigation into Trump is still going on and apologies but I lack the motivation to list all the highlights so I defer to the ATS community to continue the thread. I know there are those here that I would disappoint if I tried anyhow...

"any crime, any time" is the definition of the special councils writ.

The way it relates to Hillary's email is that you guys had 2 years nearly unopposed and didn't do jack. Sorry for you. Maybe, your leaders know they don't have *snip on her... You know, again 2 years unopposed and the oppositions investigation is going smooth.

Weak.

See that's how things work in reality. If you have a real crime to investigate, you investigate it.

Hey how about Ivanka's email server, should she be serving time with Hillary? You for two tiered justice? Why do you hate the constitution?

Again, Weak.