It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: infolurker
Solutions, any solutions, are premature until one has identified a corresponding problem. My analysis indicates a ~90 year period cycle that accounts for any warming that we have been experiencing. That cycle effectively will mask any longer-term or linear changes unless we have a minimum of a full cycle of data. In this case, that would be 90 years worth of direct temperature observations, as opposed to the 69 years I have available. Perhaps we can get a better idea around 2040 or so.
Until we can determine there is an issue with carbon dioxide levels, any talk of solutions is moot. Solutions do no good unless they address a problem.
TheRedneck
temperature rise since 1950
as it simply indicates a natural cyclical behavior
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: rickymouse
Close... what my analysis suggests is that any linear warming trend is undetectable at this time due to the ~90 year temperature cycle we are approaching the crest of. That's not to say there is zero contribution from carbon dioxide levels, but it does suggest such contribution is not required to explain present warming trends.
TheRedneck