Avenatti Arrested for Domestic Violence

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: seagull

He was arrested a week ago.
Don't prosecutors review the evidence before deciding to pursue a case or not? Or are you thinking that the prosecutor must be corrupt because he dropped the case? Because obviously, Avenatti is guilty. TMZ said so.

Well, there's also this...
www.cnn.com...

Aspiring actress Mareli Miniutti was granted a restraining order against famed lawyer Michael Avenatti on Monday, and accused him of physical and verbal violence -- including hitting her face with pillows, calling her an "ungrateful bitch" and dragging her across the floor.

The revelation comes after Avenatti was arrested by Los Angeles police on suspicion of felony domestic violence last week. CNN has confirmed that Miniutti is the alleged victim in the arrest. Avenatti, who was released on bail the day of the arrest, has not yet been charged in the case.

Restraining orders require evidence. Obviously a judge deemed Avenatti poses a danger to her.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

Restraining orders require evidence.

Yes. A statement is sufficient evidence for a restraining order to be granted.

That does not mean that there is evidence of felonious abuse.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Restraining orders require evidence.

Yes.
A statement is sufficient evidence for a restraining order to be granted.

Not a guarantee, at least not in Alaska... who the hell knows what California requires, taking their current mentally ill state of laws and policies into account.