It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
Not mentioned in this article: It is generally agreed that the last ice age ended about 12,000 years ago - although some claim it hasn't actually ended yet.
So you think the two events are correlated? I'd assume an impact of that size would throw a lot of debris in our atmosphere and cause our planet to cool down even more.
We emphasize that even this broad age estimate remains uncertain and that further investigation of the age of the Hiawatha impact crater is necessary. Regardless of its exact age, based on the size of the Hiawatha impact crater, this impact very likely had significant environmental consequences in the Northern Hemisphere and possibly globally (35).
Because it is not yet known whether the Greenland Ice Sheet covered this region at the time of the impact, or its thickness at that time or the impact angle, our estimates of impactor size, initial crater size, impact melt volume, and ejecta thickness and extent should be considered preliminary.
Now that's the Phage we've been waiting for.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: stormcell
We emphasize that even this broad age estimate remains uncertain and that further investigation of the age of the Hiawatha impact crater is necessary. Regardless of its exact age, based on the size of the Hiawatha impact crater, this impact very likely had significant environmental consequences in the Northern Hemisphere and possibly globally (35).
But, as yet, no ejecta has been found in Greenland. This complicates aging the impact. That's why there is such a wide range.
And they can't tell whether or not there was an ice sheet there at the time.
Because it is not yet known whether the Greenland Ice Sheet covered this region at the time of the impact, or its thickness at that time or the impact angle, our estimates of impactor size, initial crater size, impact melt volume, and ejecta thickness and extent should be considered preliminary.
advances.sciencemag.org...
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: watchitburn
I don't think people in India would see the impact of a meteor in Greenland.
They would if the sea level rose 400 feet or so where they built their major cities.
originally posted by: MissSmartypants
Now that's the Phage we've been waiting for.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: stormcell
We emphasize that even this broad age estimate remains uncertain and that further investigation of the age of the Hiawatha impact crater is necessary. Regardless of its exact age, based on the size of the Hiawatha impact crater, this impact very likely had significant environmental consequences in the Northern Hemisphere and possibly globally (35).
But, as yet, no ejecta has been found in Greenland. This complicates aging the impact. That's why there is such a wide range.
And they can't tell whether or not there was an ice sheet there at the time.
Because it is not yet known whether the Greenland Ice Sheet covered this region at the time of the impact, or its thickness at that time or the impact angle, our estimates of impactor size, initial crater size, impact melt volume, and ejecta thickness and extent should be considered preliminary.
advances.sciencemag.org...
The association of shocked quartz grains mantled by carbonaceous material, microbreccias with amorphous carbonaceous matrix, and glasses with a range of mineral-like compositions is highly unusual for confirmed impact structures, and we are unaware of any directly comparable grain assemblages from these structures. The large morphological and compositional variety of the HW21-2016 grains is unlikely to stem from a homogenized melt sheet on a crater floor. Rather, it probably represents components of the uppermost, unlithified part of an impact structure, and at least a few grains are considered likely to be ejecta (e.g., Fig. 3, G and H).
The other head-scratcher is the absence in the vicinity of the Hiawatha site of any rocky material that would have been ejected outwards from the crater on impact.
Prof Kjær says these missing signatures might be explained by a very shallow angle of impact that took most of the ejecta to the north. And if the fall-out area was covered in ice, it's possible any debris was later transported away.
originally posted by: Fools
a reply to: MindBodySpiritComplex
Somewhere soon, Graham Hancock will read this and get a huge boner.
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
So you think the two events are correlated? I'd assume an impact of that size would throw a lot of debris in our atmosphere and cause our planet to cool down even more.
Randall Carlson suggests there were two impacts, and probably more, created by the fragmentation of the Comet Encke. The first one (12,900 years ago) caused huge fires worldwide, throwing dust and ash into the air which halted and reversed the warming which was starting just before the Younger Dryas. The second event (11,600 years ago) was an airburst over the North American ice sheet that threw up more water vapor than ash, stimulating a greenhouse effect and faster warming. Supposedly it was the second one that wiped out Atlantis and fatally crippled the newly-emerged "advanced" global civilization that knew about stuff like astronomy/astrology, farming, law, and building stuff using big-ass rocks. Supposedly.
Sometime in late October, apparently when we pass through the Taurid meteor stream agai
Pn, which is why various cultures still have a "Day of the Dead" around that time. Also, of course, because it's fall.