It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: BlackJackal
originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: BlackJackal
These are all non-operational. So, what is the threat? Now we know about them and...not seeing the downside here.
No one ever said they were launch sites. They are hidden bases for research and development. The North doesn't need permanent launch facilities they have mobile launch units. That was why I mentioned the Obama era program to track those mobile launchers being grounded.
If tensions rose, the report says, the missiles would be transported from the base to prearranged launching sites — often no more than a wide spot in a road. The mobile launchers can move quickly — they can be ready to fire in under an hour — which is why the United States has been trying to get the small satellites into the sky for early warning. The satellites have a special kind of sensor using “synthetic aperture radar” that cuts through clouds.
They have no mobile launch capabilities in ICBMs only ballistic rockets. Means they ignite fly up and back down just like artillery. There only rocket with the capabilities to reach orbit is a liquid-fueled rocket that is fired from a launch tower. This is why we knew when they were preparing for a launch because they literally assemble it and fuel it on the launch tower. They as of yet not figured out how to make an ICBM mobile it is not as easy as you think. Even when they tried to show off during a military parade it was painfully obvious there mobile launcher was a fake. they have claimed to have an erector launcher but no evidence to show this to be true. There primary ICBM was Hwasong-15 its a very big rocket and very difficult to launch from a mobile launcher. Realize even the US and Russia didnt develop this until the 60s. Silo launch is still the primary method even today. They only had one site to assemble these rockets and it was damaged than they disassembled it. To my knowledge they have not created a new launch site yet and as i said earlier this report from March was discussing mobile rocket artillery units. they fire off hundreds of rockets in an artillery-like barrage.
Now if you have evidence to the contrary im sure there are alot of people that would love to see it.
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: BlackJackal
So they claimed but no mobile launcher capable has been seen. They use a mobile erector however it actually involves them assembling the launch tower takes a couple of hours. This isnt like most mobile launchers that launch from the vehicle itself and even with the erector still have to program and launch missile. They dont have a working guidance system and rely upon simply having the rocket run out of fuel. Unless you know something military analysts dont?
Look, if there is a logical connection between this topic and warmongering, surely someone as smart as you can easily write it down right?
originally posted by: BlackJackal
Because here is the logical flow of my argument:
1. President Trump said North Korea was no longer a nuclear threat
2. New satellite images and US Intelligence confirmation state N Korea has continued their nuclear and ballistic research
3. Therefore Trump was not honest with the American People
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: BlackJackal
Look, if there is a logical connection between this topic and warmongering, surely someone as smart as you can easily write it down right?
I did... several times. You just either couldn't or wouldn't grasp it. I'm giving the benefit of the doubt and going with wouldn't.
You're welcome.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: VictorVonDoom
originally posted by: BlackJackal
Because here is the logical flow of my argument:
1. President Trump said North Korea was no longer a nuclear threat
2. New satellite images and US Intelligence confirmation state N Korea has continued their nuclear and ballistic research
3. Therefore Trump was not honest with the American People
1. Israel is not a nuclear threat to the US.
2. US intelligence agencies believe Israel has nuclear weapons.
3. I lied in statement 1.
I guess since Israel has a greater number of nuclear weapons and efficient delivery systems, they pose a greater threat to the US. We'll need to do something about them first.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
I was wondering when the party of peace would start up with the war-mongering again...
So, what's the next step according to this party of peace? Nuke 'em? Then blame it on Trump, right?
I swear, it's no wonder we have been used and abused by practically every nation on earth for so long... Trump makes a statement that everything is being handled and people seem to think that flowers are sprouting out of the test grounds and the birds are gleefully chirping Kumbaya. No. This ain't Disney people! North Korea did not... can not... change everything overnight, nor do I expect them to. We have not lifted a single sanction either, and last I heard we were considering starting our training exercises back with South Korea. We're not backing down from our aggressive stance.
In the meantime, North Korea is not going to just roll over and start crying "Please don't hurt me" either. We're holding talks aimed at denuclearization. South Korea is holding talks aimed at denuclearization. North Korea is attending talks aimed at denuclearization. We're watching their sites; they're watching us watch their sites; Japan and South Korea are holding their breath.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: Irishhaf
They were never a threat to the US, south korea sure, japan even yep, the Chinese living near the Nuke facility uh huh (yea not directly but radiation poisoning can still kill whether they meant to or not).
lastly yall really need to make up your minds wasn't long ago folks were panicking about tough talk with north korea leading to war, he sits down and talks and the same people panic saying trump is giving up everything to them, and now that the negotiations are continuing the same people are trying to say we need to stop him by any means because he is a threat.
So which is it?
Mr. President, it is time to lead on the Korean crisis. Make a statement from the Rose Garden and send a strong message to the man child!
Where is the President? It is time for him to come on TV and show strength against the repeated threats from North Korea -- and others.
Obama is now warning North Korea on the Yongbyon nuclear reactor t.co... After Syria, our enemies are laughing!
Do you think John Kerry is aware of the fact that they are building nuclear weapons in Iran and North Korea and Pakistan already has them!!
Russia has more warheads than ever, N Korea is testing nukes, and Iran got a sweetheart deal to keep theirs. Thanks, @HillaryClinton.
The U.S. has been talking to North Korea, and paying them extortion money, for 25 years. Talking is not the answer!
originally posted by: BlackJackal
originally posted by: VictorVonDoom
originally posted by: BlackJackal
Because here is the logical flow of my argument:
1. President Trump said North Korea was no longer a nuclear threat
2. New satellite images and US Intelligence confirmation state N Korea has continued their nuclear and ballistic research
3. Therefore Trump was not honest with the American People
1. Israel is not a nuclear threat to the US.
2. US intelligence agencies believe Israel has nuclear weapons.
3. I lied in statement 1.
I guess since Israel has a greater number of nuclear weapons and efficient delivery systems, they pose a greater threat to the US. We'll need to do something about them first.
So there is no difference between Israel and North Korea? Really? Your argument is nonsense.