It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What direction does this point if not voter fraud?
originally posted by: RadioRobert
If you were in charge in Broward, why would you refuse to allow inspection according to the law? If a judge sent an order personally naming you, "Mr./Ms X, you are in violation of the law. Youu must obey this law and allow inspection and provide total numbers", what would make you ignore it? Under what circumstances would you personally say, "# the law and that judge, I'm not allowing observers or inspection. I'd rather be held in contempt and break the law" ?
What direction does this point if not voter fraud?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: RadioRobert
We who? Did I say that? Did you?
But is there evidence of election fraud in Brower? I hadn't heard that.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: RadioRobert
We who? Did I say that? Did you?
But is there evidence of election fraud in Broward? I hadn't heard that.
You don't think this is evidence of voter fraud, but can find no alternative explanation for it.
That depends. I think in this case it would be considered civil contempt.
Contempt itself is a crime.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: RadioRobert
That depends. I think in this case it would be considered civil contempt.
Contempt itself is a crime.
But I'm not an attorney.
She broke an order in order to break a law.
She's breaking a law and placing herself in contempt