It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: roadgravel
Now the media is to be trusted?
Cameras and ballots don't go together. The data is probably not visible but can that be assured.
originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: Boadicea
The big question is "does it contain ballots".
So many people don't even try to do they job correctly any more. I wonder if the guy would have forgot his luggage or shopping bags.
Registered Voters as of11/12/18
Democrats:593,783
Republicans:252,132
NPA:328,987
Other:7,834
Total:1,182,736
Registered Voters:
1,179,189
Ballots Cast:
843,767
Voter Turnout:
71.55%
Why does the right scream fake news and then spread it. LMAO
originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: dragonridr
I am just saying do it proper. An observer is fine also. The news doesn't have to access everything with video equipment.
Geezz.
eta:
Who trusts every reporter to do things ethical.
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: je55ejame5
Why does the right scream fake news and then spread it. LMAO
Oh dear... The left-right paradigm...
Perhaps someone will prove them wrong about the box found... But there is no doubt that the claims were made.
originally posted by: roadgravel
Is someone allowed to audit all the video and photos. Not showing certain images does not mean they don't exist.
I can see the need or desire for an independent observer during these recounts to assure it is done correctly.
It is all about demographics
originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
originally posted by: roadgravel
Is someone allowed to audit all the video and photos. Not showing certain images does not mean they don't exist.
I can see the need or desire for an independent observer during these recounts to assure it is done correctly.
Why do you think this isn't the case already? Every vote is already counted by representatives of both parties. I hqave no objection to independent observers, but not observers hand picked by each party.
They have already been proven wrong. All provisional ballots are removed from the boxes when polling is completed at each site. They then fill the boxes with election supplies and leave for pickup.
(1)(a) Every person who has custody of a public record shall permit the record to be inspected and copied by any person desiring to do so, at any reasonable time, under reasonable conditions, and under supervision by the custodian of the public records.
...
(5) When ballots are produced under this section for inspection or examination, no persons other than the supervisor of elections or the supervisor’s employees shall touch the ballots. If the ballots are being examined before the end of the contest period in s. 102.168, the supervisor of elections shall make a reasonable effort to notify all candidates by telephone or otherwise of the time and place of the inspection or examination. All such candidates, or their representatives, shall be allowed to be present during the inspection or examination.
originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
originally posted by: roadgravel
Is someone allowed to audit all the video and photos. Not showing certain images does not mean they don't exist.
I can see the need or desire for an independent observer during these recounts to assure it is done correctly.
Why do you think this isn't the case already? Every vote is already counted by representatives of both parties. I hqave no objection to independent observers, but not observers hand picked by each party.