It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: RadioRobert
I do not think that non-compliance with a court order can be considered to be evidence of a crime.
originally posted by: The GUT
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: RadioRobert
I do not think that non-compliance with a court order can be considered to be evidence of a crime.
Daaaang. I've bookmarked this one. I don't care how invested I was in any specific argument, I couldn't give disingenuous answers like those and face my ATS fambly or look in the mirror for a long time. Not even if I were paid to do it.
The evidentiary items are multitudinous and the particular question of RadioRobert was concise. As is my conclusion of your answer.
Nah. You can request a pat down. Perfectly legal.
If you are caught avoiding the metal detector it constitutes strong evidence (not proof) that you are attempting to commit another crime.
No. But it would be a definite case of criminal indirect contempt, which is a crime in and of itself.
If you violate a judge's order for a breathalyzer -ignition system by disabling, it is strong evidence, not proof, that you continue to drink and drive.
You might be able to show alternative motive which would weaken that evidence,
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: RadioRobert
Nah. You can request a pat down. Perfectly legal.
If you are caught avoiding the metal detector it constitutes strong evidence (not proof) that you are attempting to commit another crime.
No. But it would be a definite case of criminal indirect contempt, which is a crime in and of itself.
If you violate a judge's order for a breathalyzer -ignition system by disabling, it is strong evidence, not proof, that you continue to drink and drive.
originally posted by: Phage
Nah. You can request a pat down. Perfectly legal.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: RadioRobert
You might be able to show alternative motive which would weaken that evidence,
Guilty until proven innocent.
Groovy.
You have the right to opt-out of the body scanners and request a pat-down. Unless your boarding pass indicates that you are subject to heightened security, which will be denoted by four S’s in big bold letters, you may simply tell the person running the body scanner that you “opt out.” Try to keep a close eye on your belongings while they find someone to pat you down.
The glorious Phage misrepresents "evidence" and "proof" because he can't face evidence contrary to his position.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Wardaddy454
You should have asked to see a supervisor. But that might be considered evidence of a crime, according to some.
You have the right to opt-out of the body scanners and request a pat-down. Unless your boarding pass indicates that you are subject to heightened security, which will be denoted by four S’s in big bold letters, you may simply tell the person running the body scanner that you “opt out.” Try to keep a close eye on your belongings while they find someone to pat you down.
professional-troublemaker.com...
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: RadioRobert
The glorious Phage misrepresents "evidence" and "proof" because he can't face evidence contrary to his position.
Not at all.
"Avoiding" a metal detector is not evidence of a crime.
I says to myself, "Oops, I just remembered I have my pocketknife in my pocket. I'll be right back."
Guard "Arrest that man!"
Which is why they have those bins you put your keys and stuff in.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Wardaddy454
Yes. And it's not valid.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Wardaddy454
Which is why they have those bins you put your keys and stuff in.
Yes. And if you put your pocketknife in it, they will confiscate it. True story, they took my Leatherman.