How does Evolution explain Male and Female - Why are there two sexes Creating Genetic Variations ?

a reply to: dragonridr

I'm glad you brought this up - You would think that by now, vast as the univrse is, but with all the super powr telescopes
and other such detection equipment, some sort of solid evidence of life of some sort would appear.

By evidence i mean evidence that is more than anecdotal, something tangible.

Molecules on meteors are not life - And many of my favorite UFO/alien theorists giving anecdotal evidence
still proves nothing.

But even if life, say bacteria, were to appear on say a meteor - Like I said the chemical reactions that would induce
life could very possibly occur occasionaly, if not often.

But how often would sexual reproduction occur in whatever life form that occured? - How often would it
cause genteic mutations causing Evolution of species?

originally posted by: AlienView
If you want to say anything is possible, sure anything is possible - But the probability of this experiment occuring by
accident is incredibly small - And I do like long shots but I won't bet on that one.

That is your ego speaking again.

Anything that is possible will happen eventually. That is a fact.

originally posted by: moebius

originally posted by: AlienView
If you want to say anything is possible, sure anything is possible - But the probability of this experiment occuring by
accident is incredibly small - And I do like long shots but I won't bet on that one.

That is your ego speaking again.

Anything that is possible will happen eventually. That is a fact.

Right - And according to Hugh Everett's 'Many Worlds' interpretation all possible alternatives actually do occur
- But Sex, genetics, did not occur until someone or something dreamed it up and caused it to occur
- no accident - my opiniion.

They used to say that if you gave enough monkeys enaough typewriters, they would eventually type out
the Encyclopedia Britannica.

AlienView says that if you give a million monkeys a million typewriters, not one page of the Encyclopedia Britannica
would ever appear.

a reply to: AlienView

To a species that has developed beyond a organic existence and has evolved more within the technological singularity with their spirit energy, the human spirit within its organic humanoid body form is still somewhat existing in primitive form.

This form of humanoid containing the advanced human spirit requires currently two opposite sexes or genders to reproduce in order to replicate and or transmigrate the soul material. Unless the soul material is waved in as a incarnate from either ancient or alien spirit energy or incarnate group (starseeds).

The xx chromosome based females and xy chromosome based males could of existed as androgynous beings long ago that could have had their genetics separated for whatever reason.
As the humanoid body advances with technology the human spirit then my begin to evolve in ways with the technological singularity. Evolve in ways that begin to stray away from a organic based existence as the human spirit learns how to manufacture avatar based or bot based bodies to beam into like Wi-Fi spirit waves in order to explore and study the universe more in-depth.

Good question

NAMASTE*******

a reply to: Ophiuchus 13

I suppose that may be the closest to an answer we may get - And as usual imaginative and interesting.

And so is listening to Linda Moulton Howe give lectures on aliens and how they have been here for eons.

However real proof is another story - and the wherefrom, where to, and why, of aliens. sex amd genetics
remains to be seen.

originally posted by: AlienView
AlienView says that if you give a million monkeys a million typewriters, not one page of the Encyclopedia Britannica
would ever appear.

And that is where you are wrong.

A random generator would produce one page of the Encyclopedia Britannica at some point.

In the observable universe you have 10 billion galaxies. Every galaxy has about 100 billion stars. Most of the stars have planets. A large part of those planets have organic compounds. A small number of those planets will develop simple single-celled life. An even smaller number of planets with single cellular life will develop multicellular life. An even smaller number of those planets will develop two sexes.

The chance might be incredibility small. But it is not zero. And given the 1 billion trillion stars in the universe it is bound to happen.

a reply to: moebius

Science is wrong about those being the most abundant chemicals in the universe. We have only been to to the moon once & mars with rovers yet we are already saying we know how the universe is made from sitting on our back porch haha. It is a great theory & yea our galaxy is made up of them chemicals but to say the whole universe is a huge stretch.

a reply to: AlienView

First you have to realize that male & female or asexualism are not the only reproductive systems. There are many options still yet undiscovered universally.

Human reproduction consists of one chemical conjuction enter another chemical conjuction whos host & environment are suitable for life to grow. A rock for example is the same concept just very primitive; it lets a load go(part of itself) it travels & will either corrode away or gather to create another lil rock that grows or dies with time. You need hydrogen & oxygen to make water, each of those chemicals need other chemicals & matter to split apart & form. Evilution is all things found on earth & in parts of our galaxy we hace discovered. It works with everything, that is why & what everything is in more or less advanced ways.

The answer is the first and second law of thermodynamics - conservation of energy and the concept that heat flows from hot to cold and not the reverse.

How does this apply to your question? Life is generally defined as the ability to reproduce. If life obeys the laws of thermodynamics, which it does, then life must follow a path that is low energy but still be reproducible.

So the result of all that is the number 2 - 2 elements in nature, male and female, which can reproduce utilizing the least amount of energy for the stability of the system. Why would you need a threesome when a twosome can do the job??

a reply to: AlienView

What is the meaning of life?


Why isnt a question evolution would answer. That is a question for philosophy.

There are plenty of varying opinions and philosophies of that question.

You are not asking or framing the question correctly and it's obvious click bait.

No ody working in evolution would be trying to answer that question.

That is a cosmology question.

originally posted by: Phantom423
The answer is the first and second law of thermodynamics - conservation of energy and the concept that heat flows from hot to cold and not the reverse.

How does this apply to your question? Life is generally defined as the ability to reproduce. If life obeys the laws of thermodynamics, which it does, then life must follow a path that is low energy but still be reproducible.

So the result of all that is the number 2 - 2 elements in nature, male and female, which can reproduce utilizing the least amount of energy for the stability of the system. Why would you need a threesome when a twosome can do the job??

Life is not related to thermodynamic laws it arises within them as we know so far.

Also life is not defined by reproduction. That is ludicrous. It's the distinction between plants and animals vs inorganic compounds.

originally posted by: AlienView
why more variation? - Why should Evolution do anything - Why should it exist?

So that living things can change and adapt to their environments over time... That's really all there is to it. There are plenty of cases where evolution didn't occur or occur fast enough... And those species died and became extinct. And then there are other cases where evolution simply wasn't necessary, as with crocodiles, which have been around for like 80 million years.

originally posted by: SatansPride
a reply to: moebius

Science is wrong about those being the most abundant chemicals in the universe. We have only been to to the moon once & mars with rovers yet we are already saying we know how the universe is made from sitting on our back porch haha. It is a great theory & yea our galaxy is made up of them chemicals but to say the whole universe is a huge stretch.

This statement shows a total lack of why we say carbon is one of the first and most prevalent elements in the universe.

a reply to: luthier

the condition that distinguishes animals and plants from inorganic matter, including the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death. "the origins of life"

That's ridiculous - reproduction is an integral part of life as we know it. Without reproduction there is no capacity for growth.

Life is not related to thermodynamic laws it arises within them as we know so far.

Please backup that statement with citations and evidence.

a reply to: Phantom423

Since plenty of things are alive that can't reproduce you would be incorrect to use one of the least important aspects of life to define it. An animal or flower can grow and even mutate in one lifetime.

To add in this life we have selective breeding, genetic engineering, cloning forces evolution.

Reproduction is not a good way to define what is alive..

Thermodynamics is an observation of behavior in non quantum events in this observable dimension.

a reply to: luthier

Can you please provide an example of something that is alive but cannot reproduce and that was not created by reproduction. How did this non-reproducing object come to be? Did it just appear out of nothing?

Everything obeys the laws of thermodynamics. Please prove with examples how something does not obey the laws of thermodynamics.

Your replies are specious and without context.

that's a good point.

a reply to: luthier

Carbon based products are the most flexible & adaptable or hard & irreversable materials we have discovered, though we have not played with the billions of galaxies chemicals we can not see yet. Carbon pretty much sticks to any molocule you through at it because of it's magnetic properties. Carbon likes to attract not repel. I do not study chemicals, though that is what some people call common sense & other say it is rocket science.

$eriously though, can we really know what the universe consists of just by looking at stars we can barely see & sending an automic robot to grab chemicals that are to light we can not contain them in our vessels. So they basically are not even grabbed because we do not have an air tight enough box to grab universal juice haha. Sure we have some anti matter properties though can not seem to capture them properly to tweak. We have no clue what the universe is made of, these are good theories that help the understanding though we should all no that common sense tells us we hace no clue what this universe it. Hell it was just 200 years ago we figured out microscopes to see smaller chemicals so we think we are gods that know all because we see the big little stuff.

Anyone who thinks subotomic particles are small are clearly mistaken, in another 200 years they will be as big as our elemental charts chemicals to us now. They obviously will still be the same size, this world got real small & little chemicals got real big. We are always seeing smaller to get bigger. It does not stop here & this universe is huge & not made out of the same chemicals through its whole structure, no advanced organism is.

a reply to: Phantom423

The team say that situations which break the second law of thermodynamics are not ruled out in principle, but are rare.

phys.org...

Physicists Might Have Found a Way to Break The Second Law of Thermodynamics. ... Entropy is a measure of the randomness or disorder within a closed or isolated system, and the Second Law of Thermodynamics states that as usable energy is lost, chaos increases - and that progression towards disorder can never be reversed.

www.sciencealert.com...


Abiogenesis happened correct or did God make us?

The fact life exists at all is the proof. Something came from inorganic life that became life right?