It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carpooler
a reply to: Annee
Cali lived in a Fire Ecologic environment successfully for nearly 500 years. Then their housewives messed everything up by outlawing the yearly burns of all those cattle pastures to stop the harmless ashes from mucking up their clotheslines. Hello! Annee.
originally posted by: flyandi
Damn you Democrats and Damn you Republicans! Yeah I said it - both of you are responsible for this. Your endless bickering and cowering and shifting and deceiving and NOT taking action brings us to this point.
No one can prevent a wild fire but we can decide how big they will be - yet both parties choose to ignore this and rather make this a political issue.
Damn you both - red and blue! Time for a new color!
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Annee
Cleaning up the trash (undergrowth and old growth) is another good place to start.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Annee
Just keeping dry brush away form structures won't cut it. The problem is that once enough dry brush form other locations catches on fire, the intense heat causes the fire to be capable of leaping over small areas with no brush.
The only way to stop the massive fires is to remove the brush and old growth everywhere. As in logging areas which have old growth, which incidentally would lower lumber prices and pay for itself in the process.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Annee
How is funding an issue in logging old growth? People will pay you for the privilege of logging it. It won't cost money; it'll make money!
Wood has value.
TheRedneck
Pimlott said climate change and decades of poorly managed forests are causing longer fire seasons that stress resources and require new tools and methods to counteract.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Annee
How is funding an issue in logging old growth? People will pay you for the privilege of logging it. It won't cost money; it'll make money!
Wood has value.
TheRedneck
Maybe in your neck of the woods.
Not gonna happen in CA without permits, insurance, environmental approval, signnoff from property owner (if you can find out exactly who owns what), etc etc etc.
The largest blaze in state history, the 410,200-acre Ranch Fire, this past summer burned on large swaths of land managed by the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management in Mendocino and nearby counties north of San Francisco.
In fact, six of California's 16 most destructive wildfires in the past 25 years — in terms of structures destroyed — occurred on federal lands, according to Cal Fire records.
In Shasta County, last summer's 229,650-acre Carr Fire started on National Park Service lands before spreading to private property and eventually into the city of Redding.
The president has been attacked by his opponents both for politicising a natural disaster and for refusing to engage with overwhelming scientific evidence that climate change is to blame for the extent of the devastation, not mismanagement.
The Pasadena Fire Association meanwhile tweeted: “Mr. President, with all due respect, you are wrong. The fires in So. Cal are urban interface fires and have NOTHING to do with forest management. Come to SoCal and learn the facts & help the victims.”
Speaking for the emergency services personnel on the ground, the president of the California Professional Firefighters union commented: “Wildfires are sparked and spread not only in forested areas but in populated areas and open fields fuelled by parched vegetation, high winds, low humidity and geography.
“Moreover, nearly 60 per cent of California forests are under federal management, and another two-thirds under private control. It is the federal government that has chosen to divert resources away from forest management, not California,” Brian K Rice said.
Mr Rice further branded Mr Trump’s assertion “ill-timed, ill-informed and demeaning to those who are suffering” as well as “dangerously wrong”.