It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: xuenchen
It's all about 2020 now.
This is where the law that your name must match exactly on your ID and you voting record comes in.
In North Dakota they went after people who only had PO Boxes for addresses.
As for voter fraud in Florida. So far there is literally no evidence that there is any voter fraud just a bunch of conspiracy theories from crazies. If you have hard evidence please share.
That is no where near the problem that the republicans claim it to be.
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: xuenchen
It's all about 2020 now.
There is not much the Dem's can do with just the house.
Now that Whitaker is on the job, the Muh Russia Investigation
will probably have to close up shop and go home. The strategic
planning and surgical strike - perfect timing.
It would be the perfect time for an investigation into SPYGATE,
that might tie in nicely with 2020.
Source: www.newsweek.com...
Former White House counsel Don McGahn interviewed Whitaker in July 2017 about taking a position on the legal team and he was described as a “legal attack dog” who could take on Special Counsel Robert Mueller, The Times reported.
theconservativetreehouse.com... a-to-eliminate-trump/
Democrats in the House intend to raise taxes on individuals and corporations; roll back the MAGAnomic policy for corporate tax incentives (investment, jobs, and manufacturing) and create a bigger gap between low and top income earners through their spending controls. In essence, Democrats take control over income earnings (via tax policy) and distribute it to their constituents based on need. [Historic Fabian approach]
Simultaneously, the House committees (Oversight, Judiciary, Intel, Finance) will begin immediate investigations of the Trump administration, writ large, and -using those investigations- secure the pathway to the 2020 election cycle.
theconservativetreehouse.com...
One of the more *consequential* background objectives of Whitaker has nothing to do with Mueller; and more to do with Horowitz. As in: stopping a DOJ/FBI administrative state officials from doing what they did with the prior IG report (June '18) on DOJ/FBI bias & misconduct.
More at: www.wsj.com...
WASHINGTON—The Justice Department is expected to publish a legal opinion in support of Matthew Whitaker’s installation as acting attorney general as early as Tuesday, a person familiar with the matter said, following questions about whether he can legally serve in the role.
The department’s Office of Legal Counsel is expected to say that President Trump had the ability to appoint Mr. Whitaker, the person said. Mr. Whitaker took over last week as an interim replacement for former Attorney General Jeff Sessions when Mr. Sessions was ousted by Mr. Trump.
The opinion is expected to support the Trump administration’s position that the president’s authority to tap Mr. Whitaker is affirmed by guidance the office issued in 2003. At that time, the office concluded that President George W. Bush could name a non-confirmed employee of the Office of Management and Budget as the agency’s acting director.
The OMB director, like the attorney general, is a principal officer of the federal government. The 2003 opinion avoided that problem by defining an acting director as an “inferior officer,” who under Supreme Court precedent doesn’t require Senate approval to be appointed.
Critics from across the ideological spectrum have said Mr. Whitaker’s appointment is a potentially invalid end-run around the Senate’s power to provide “advice and consent” on senior executive-branch nominations. Others have said Mr. Whitaker’s appointment was lawful under a statute called the Vacancies Reform Act.
In addition, others say Mr. Whitaker’s ties to a witness in special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 elections and his history of critical comments about that inquiry raise questions about his impartiality and his ability to supervise it. The special counsel is designed to be insulated from political considerations.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: carewemust
They can't pass anything without the Senate and Trump. They're lame ducks being tested by the American people. No worries.
TheRedneck