Trump coming after obama?

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

You understand that a business and personal bankruptcy are completely different...right?

So he wasn't director of those bankrupt companies?

a reply to: chr0naut

Not sure. I am sure he sat on the board of all of them, but being director of each? I don't know.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

No, you demand, and that´s why you get none.

a reply to: JinMI

Typical copout, "quote me." Lol. I have yet to see you address the situation in a satisfactory way. You have either sidestepped the issue or given non-answers.

Why did Trump hire and reward the establishment if he is anti-establishment?

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Who said Trump is anti-establishment?

a reply to: verschickter

Sounds like the typical copout to me. Instead of addressing my questions you accuse me of being a liar. Typical deflection tactic, I would hope you're better than that.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

You are a liar. There's almost 2 pages of proof.

a reply to: JinMI

So he's not anti-establishment? If so that is news coming from you.

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: JinMI

So he's not anti-establishment? If so that is news coming from you.

But you said:

You haven't made yourself clear on it.

I don't think you have any idea what you're talking about.

a reply to: JinMI

I haven't lied about anything. If I were a liar I wouldn't have admitted to putting words in your mouth.

Address the question and not me. Addressing my integrity is nothing more than a deflection and copout.

a reply to: JinMI

You refuse to give a straight answer. Is Trump anti-establishment or not? Help me out here, please. Either he is or he isn't. Your posting history of defending him leads me to believe you think he is anti-establishment. Correct me if I'm wrong.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

You understand that a business and personal bankruptcy are completely different...right?

So he wasn't director of those bankrupt companies?

Oh c'mon now, you damn well know the difference between chapter 7 and chapter 11, and you also know most billionaires have bankruptcies in their history.

It's a common thing.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Is Trump anti-establishment or not?

Woot, finally! Was that so difficult?

First, we have to define what the 'establishment' is. To me, it means part of the government order. Those who play in DC with taxpayer money and pay to play to be part of.

I could not honestly say that Trump never had a part of this. So my answer is no. I don't think Trump is anti-establishment.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Addressing my integrity is nothing more than a deflection and copout.

Your integrity speaks for itself, or lack thereof.

originally posted by: eisegesis
a reply to: chr0naut

Oh, and remember, this thread started because Trump is upset with what Michelle Obama wrote.

That is false.

Sorry, this thread started because it is alleged that Trump is upset and about to retaliate against what Michelle Obama wrote (read the last line of the first post).

a reply to: JinMI

So the rhetoric about him being anti-establishment is a bunch of woo? Thanks for admitting that, finally.

a reply to: JinMI

I could say the same about yours. The past two years of you calling Trump anti-establishment turned out to be a lie.

And yes, you are free to deny your posting habits all you want, it doesn't change the fact that Trump's entire platform is based on him being anti-establishment.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

I only speak for me.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

The past two years of you calling Trump anti-establishment turned out to be a lie.

You're seriously going to keep this up?

Surely to protect your dignity if not your integrity and credibility, you can find proof. Otherwise you remain a liar of the most obvious degree. There is a clear trail of it here.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

The past two years of you calling Trump anti-establishment turned out to be a lie.

You're seriously going to keep this up?

Surely to protect your dignity if not your integrity and credibility, you can find proof. Otherwise you remain a liar of the most obvious degree. There is a clear trail of it here.

You're lying to yourself. This is the first time I've ever seen you admit he is not anti-establishment.

If he is not anti-establishment then it goes to reason he is establishment, no? If so why is the establishment media against one of their own?

Or will you now say that just because he's not anti-establishment doesn't mean he's establishment?