It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: CriticalStinker
You dont honestly believe the trucking companies are just going to absorb the extra cost without passing on the bill do you?
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: CriticalStinker
I have ran several businesses and one universal truth us the ultimately the customers pay for everything.
Cuts must happen but that's when the squealing starts..
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Aallanon
Even if you don't believe climate change is man induced, that doesn't mean that we can't speed it up.
Even if you don't believe we can't speed it up, that doesn't mean it doesn't degrade the air quality to burn fuel.
So we can all agree it hurts air quality, so I see no reason why trucking companies shouldn't help out in the localities they are burning such by paying a little extra at the pump.
That said, what degrades roads the fastest? Tractor Trailers.
I don't see whats so wrong with asking those who put more weight (literally) on our infrastructure (which is past due on repairs) to pay a little extra.
I'm not sure that's where the tax is going, but it should be.
What would you rather, everyone pay equal share to repair roads and help air quality? Or ask those that abuse those two the most to fork over a little extra?
So it's better to squeeze a bit more money from the Truckers, so the cost of goods will increase and this somehow equates to less pollution? I'm not sure I follow your logic here.