What if women went on a sex strike before the midterms?

The Dems always contradict themselves so often. However, will they have unborn children to send off to the slaughterhouses if people are not having sex?

They will mess around and lose the planned parenthood lobbyist.

originally posted by: kaylaluv


I don’t think so. I think she’s saying if women take control over what they will and won’t do in the bedroom, that could expand to other areas of their life.

Seems a partner takes care of their partners needs, so saying "provide service sex" assumes a partner does not want to provide pleasure to their mate. If that is where a relationship is at then there is more wrong with the relationship than just the sex part.

a reply to: kaylaluv

Women have always been in control. Any time there's a date, only one of the couple knows if it will end in sex... the woman. A woman's tears are like kyptonite to a man... a good cry and she'll get anything she wants. The entire economy is built around men pleasing women by buying them stuff. If it weren't for women, men would die from infections before they reached 20, because they would never shave, shower, or move out of their recliners.

If not for women, there wouldn't even be football... you think players get out there and run into each other for fun? No! It's all to impress the cheerleaders.

You think Chevy made the Corvette for men to drive around in for fun? No! they made the Corvette so men could drive around and impress women.

TheRedneck

a reply to: TheOnlyAnswer

I remember reading some study years ago that said single women tend to live longer than married women, and married men tend to live longer than single men. This would indicate that long term monogamous relationships are more beneficial to men than they are to women. *shrug* I dunno.

I was in my early thirties before I figured out that women like sex just as much if not more than men. When I was younger I really believed they held all the power in that department. Since then I have seen too many women destroy their lives, even throw away their families over good sex.

a reply to: Xtrozero

You can't call a bathroom a John..that is sexist.

Can't call it a "Jane." That would just be... weird... and sick...

TheRedneck

originally posted by: kaylaluv
She’s saying withhold sex until the man actually turns you on enough to have sex with him.

Isn't that what everyone does though?!
I won't have sex with someone who isn't turning me on and I wouldn't expect a woman to either.
Seems ridiculous to me, more bull# feminist nonsense like they can change the world by withholding sex as a training tool with dogs or something, bad dog, now you don't get to play with the stick.
I think it is quite pathetic to be honest and I'm glad I don't know any rabid feminist types like that.

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: TheOnlyAnswer

I remember reading some study years ago that said single women tend to live longer than married women, and married men tend to live longer than single men. This would indicate that long term monogamous relationships are more beneficial to men than they are to women. *shrug* I dunno.

I didn't know life expectancy is equal to joy.

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Xtrozero

You can't call a bathroom a John..that is sexist.

Can't call it a "Jane." That would just be... weird... and sick...

TheRedneck

How about Pat...covers both sides of the issue as everyone just stands their scratching their heads trying to figure out which bathroom it is.

a reply to: TheRedneck

Ha ha - I didn’t know we women were such rulers of the universe! I guess all those years ago, when women wanted to vote, and be doctors and CEOs and military pilots, but weren’t allowed - that was just men trying to impress us? hmmm...

a reply to: Xtrozero

"Excuse me; I gotta go to the Pat."

Somehow still just seems wrong...

TheRedneck

a reply to: kaylaluv

Nah, that was just men being men... but who won that battle?

TheRedneck

a reply to: TheOnlyAnswer

Sometimes when there’s no joy, life expectancies are shorter. Attitude is more powerful than you’d think!

a reply to: kaylaluv

Are you saying there's no joy for women in marriage? My wife would disagree.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: kaylaluv

Nah, that was just men being men...

Yep, that was the problem. According to the woman who wrote the article, it still is the problem. And women have to provide their own solution, by taking control of their own situation.

but who won that battle?

Women... providing their own solution by taking control of their own situation.

My Marriage must be really weird, my wife probably likes sex more than I do and I have a pretty decent sex drive for a 45 yr old.

Heck if I went on sex strike she would cave long before I did, most guys have gone on dry spells at least once and things like porn hub make it much easier now a days than it did when I was a young man and it was magazines or the still photos in the early days of the interweb.


The only marriages I can see a sex strike being effective would be one where women already hate having sex anyways.

a reply to: JAGStorm

It would make them very petty and unworthy of being in a relationship with.

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: TheRedneck

Ha ha - I didn’t know we women were such rulers of the universe! I guess all those years ago, when women wanted to vote, and be doctors and CEOs and military pilots, but weren’t allowed - that was just men trying to impress us? hmmm...

That was men trying to at least have some control, but we lost it all a while ago...can't even be a fighter pilot without some girl getting in the way...

And people wonder why sex robots are on the rise.

a reply to: kaylaluv

According to the woman who wrote the article, it still is the problem.

So because she doesn't realize the power she can have over men, other women don't?

Sounds to me like she's actually regressing women's position in society by denying their inherent power. Are you OK with that?

TheRedneck