It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Athetos
Now Autism stats will be down and child mortality will be up, enjoy your mumps,measles,small pox,HPV, and polio you guys earned it.
originally posted by: avgguy
Nothing is safe, but vaccine have saved millions, probably billions of lives. The impact of the flu alone per year is incredibly expensive, especially in the elderly and the immunocompromized.
originally posted by: surfer_soul
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
My question is why would the US government introduce a law to give economic immunity to vaccine makers in the first place? This is what happens in a system where corporate lobbyists get to influence policy. Either that, or there’s an even bigger conspiracy at play..
originally posted by: stosh64
Yet if you dare go against the 'herd' mentality and don't fully trust the government you are called a 'denier of science' and a threat to the herd.
Every time I refuse a flu shot from the doc I get the 'look', she then shakes her head and says ok. I can see a time when the government, who hasn't done the work to make sure vaccines are safe, will make it illegal to refuse their vaccines.
Now I'm a crazy anti-vaxxer, I know.
originally posted by: amazing
I think we all just want to know that there are tests and published test results for the safety of vaccines.
I think this is a good thing. All it will do is force vaccine makers to make sure vaccines are safe. I don't see the problem.
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
How do we know this? Who gives us the numbers?What if the flu shots did contain something more? how would we know? Why would anyone trust the governments we have now?
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: avgguy
Nothing is safe, but vaccine have saved millions, probably billions of lives. The impact of the flu alone per year is incredibly expensive, especially in the elderly and the immunocompromized.
The hell of it is that both you and Stosh above you are right.
originally posted by: ketsuko
...
Now I can't tell you why the government hasn't been collecting safety and efficacy studies on those vaccines. Considering the amount of data that has to be produced for animal vaccines, that seems very, very odd. Human pharma is magnitudes more stringent.
originally posted by: smkymcnugget420
a reply to: strongfp
nobody here is questioning that...what we are here questioning is the safety of giving 28 shots to newborn humans who don't have a single fully developed biological system in their bodies. we were told by the government that it was/is fine, clearly they were talking out if their collective asses. that is entirely above and beyond the question of if they work...
polio was given away for free for the benefit of humanity. all the others are patented for maximum profit. also polio (1955) and smallpox (1972) would be well before HHS took over safety regs. 32 years ago (1986)..which i think its worth noting that Autism started increasing around 1993...about 6 years AFTER that happened.... weird
blogs.plos.org...
that link also states that "ut that prevalence has actually declined between 2000 and 2010 (3,4)." which ironically enough coincides with that evil antivaxxer movement.