It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: jtrenthacker
Trump is wrong here.
It states rather simply in the 14th amendment. . .
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
-Wiki
Sorry Donny, but you'll lose this fight.
Sure, like everybody else 🤐 , psst, you're spilling water 😌
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Really? It means nothing to leftist, but suddenly it matter whens conservatives talk about it? Lol, give me a break Nyiah, you hold water for leftist and expect us to drink from it, keep your koolaid to yourself.
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Tell that to barry 😏
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Who cares, that's what I what. Patiotism still exist, I'm a nationalist so I'm all for love and respect of MY country.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123
You do not have to love and respect the country to be a citizen. Give me a break.
Tough cookies, nobody cares about when you want if it's a "by any means" circumvention to achieve it.
I say again -- there exists a process for amending. EOs are not it. THAT should make any "patriot's" blood run more than a little cold to ponder in place of that process.
Oh and I care what I want, because, I GOT WHAT I WANT 😌
MY POTUS, Repubs in power, you got nothing, keep grasping yo.
Ah, I see. The Constitution then ultimately means nothing to you and your rights at the end of the day, it's just something to control others with, when it suits you. Never mind the legitimate process, let's go balls to the wall and let the amendments be applied and retracted at the whim of any given president's itchy EO finger, actual legitimate process be damned.
Some patriot you are.
Libertarian, actually. You'll have a harder time finding a Libertarian that supports changing the Constitution through single-man EOs than you will a Republican.
Tread carefully. Your authoritarian slant is showing.
originally posted by: Arnie123
Sure, like everybody else 🤐 , psst, you're spilling water 😌
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Really? It means nothing to leftist, but suddenly it matter whens conservatives talk about it? Lol, give me a break Nyiah, you hold water for leftist and expect us to drink from it, keep your koolaid to yourself.
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Tell that to barry 😏
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Who cares, that's what I what. Patiotism still exist, I'm a nationalist so I'm all for love and respect of MY country.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123
You do not have to love and respect the country to be a citizen. Give me a break.
Tough cookies, nobody cares about when you want if it's a "by any means" circumvention to achieve it.
I say again -- there exists a process for amending. EOs are not it. THAT should make any "patriot's" blood run more than a little cold to ponder in place of that process.
Oh and I care what I want, because, I GOT WHAT I WANT 😌
MY POTUS, Repubs in power, you got nothing, keep grasping yo.
Ah, I see. The Constitution then ultimately means nothing to you and your rights at the end of the day, it's just something to control others with, when it suits you. Never mind the legitimate process, let's go balls to the wall and let the amendments be applied and retracted at the whim of any given president's itchy EO finger, actual legitimate process be damned.
Some patriot you are.
Libertarian, actually. You'll have a harder time finding a Libertarian that supports changing the Constitution through single-man EOs than you will a Republican.
Tread carefully. Your authoritarian slant is showing.
Lmfao 🤣
originally posted by: TinySickTears
originally posted by: Bluntone22
Why does every other ammendment to the constitution have restrictions but this one cant be touched?
I have all kinds of regulations dealing with my speech and right to bare arms.
How would you feel if ole Indian Warren changed the game on the right to bear arms via executive order?
Would you be cool with it?
originally posted by: TinySickTears
originally posted by: Bluntone22
Why does every other ammendment to the constitution have restrictions but this one cant be touched?
I have all kinds of regulations dealing with my speech and right to bare arms.
How would you feel if ole Indian Warren changed the game on the right to bear arms via executive order?
Would you be cool with it?
Oh, salty are we? I stated what I wanted and also what I WANT which I recieved 😌
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Sure, like everybody else 🤐 , psst, you're spilling water 😌
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Really? It means nothing to leftist, but suddenly it matter whens conservatives talk about it? Lol, give me a break Nyiah, you hold water for leftist and expect us to drink from it, keep your koolaid to yourself.
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Tell that to barry 😏
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Who cares, that's what I what. Patiotism still exist, I'm a nationalist so I'm all for love and respect of MY country.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123
You do not have to love and respect the country to be a citizen. Give me a break.
Tough cookies, nobody cares about when you want if it's a "by any means" circumvention to achieve it.
I say again -- there exists a process for amending. EOs are not it. THAT should make any "patriot's" blood run more than a little cold to ponder in place of that process.
Oh and I care what I want, because, I GOT WHAT I WANT 😌
MY POTUS, Repubs in power, you got nothing, keep grasping yo.
Ah, I see. The Constitution then ultimately means nothing to you and your rights at the end of the day, it's just something to control others with, when it suits you. Never mind the legitimate process, let's go balls to the wall and let the amendments be applied and retracted at the whim of any given president's itchy EO finger, actual legitimate process be damned.
Some patriot you are.
Libertarian, actually. You'll have a harder time finding a Libertarian that supports changing the Constitution through single-man EOs than you will a Republican.
Tread carefully. Your authoritarian slant is showing.
My, my. Aren't we sour over getting caught being the farthest thing from Republican today?
originally posted by: Arnie123
Oh, salty are we? I stated what I wanted and also what I WANT which I recieved 😌
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Sure, like everybody else 🤐 , psst, you're spilling water 😌
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Really? It means nothing to leftist, but suddenly it matter whens conservatives talk about it? Lol, give me a break Nyiah, you hold water for leftist and expect us to drink from it, keep your koolaid to yourself.
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Tell that to barry 😏
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Who cares, that's what I what. Patiotism still exist, I'm a nationalist so I'm all for love and respect of MY country.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123
You do not have to love and respect the country to be a citizen. Give me a break.
Tough cookies, nobody cares about when you want if it's a "by any means" circumvention to achieve it.
I say again -- there exists a process for amending. EOs are not it. THAT should make any "patriot's" blood run more than a little cold to ponder in place of that process.
Oh and I care what I want, because, I GOT WHAT I WANT 😌
MY POTUS, Repubs in power, you got nothing, keep grasping yo.
Ah, I see. The Constitution then ultimately means nothing to you and your rights at the end of the day, it's just something to control others with, when it suits you. Never mind the legitimate process, let's go balls to the wall and let the amendments be applied and retracted at the whim of any given president's itchy EO finger, actual legitimate process be damned.
Some patriot you are.
Libertarian, actually. You'll have a harder time finding a Libertarian that supports changing the Constitution through single-man EOs than you will a Republican.
Tread carefully. Your authoritarian slant is showing.
My, my. Aren't we sour over getting caught being the farthest thing from Republican today?
Don't throw your ill lifes choices at me because you can't get what you want. Caught? Far from or close enough, who cares? Lol
It's so hilarious because an Convo about Trump suggesting something and Leftist and their ilk loose their mind as if what he says is absolute rule and law.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: TinySickTears
originally posted by: Bluntone22
Why does every other ammendment to the constitution have restrictions but this one cant be touched?
I have all kinds of regulations dealing with my speech and right to bare arms.
How would you feel if ole Indian Warren changed the game on the right to bear arms via executive order?
Would you be cool with it?
You do know that the supreme court is in place for this exact reason right?
They rule on constitutional law.
Trump can sign whatever he want, that doesn't make a law.
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: Bluntone22
But I asked you how you would feel if he attempted to change it that way.
Unlike many here I am not a constitutional scholar. I know # about the specific process.
I suspect it's the same for many who claim they do
Cool story, if it pisses you off, Awesome.
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Oh, salty are we? I stated what I wanted and also what I WANT which I recieved 😌
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Sure, like everybody else 🤐 , psst, you're spilling water 😌
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Really? It means nothing to leftist, but suddenly it matter whens conservatives talk about it? Lol, give me a break Nyiah, you hold water for leftist and expect us to drink from it, keep your koolaid to yourself.
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Tell that to barry 😏
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Who cares, that's what I what. Patiotism still exist, I'm a nationalist so I'm all for love and respect of MY country.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123
You do not have to love and respect the country to be a citizen. Give me a break.
Tough cookies, nobody cares about when you want if it's a "by any means" circumvention to achieve it.
I say again -- there exists a process for amending. EOs are not it. THAT should make any "patriot's" blood run more than a little cold to ponder in place of that process.
Oh and I care what I want, because, I GOT WHAT I WANT 😌
MY POTUS, Repubs in power, you got nothing, keep grasping yo.
Ah, I see. The Constitution then ultimately means nothing to you and your rights at the end of the day, it's just something to control others with, when it suits you. Never mind the legitimate process, let's go balls to the wall and let the amendments be applied and retracted at the whim of any given president's itchy EO finger, actual legitimate process be damned.
Some patriot you are.
Libertarian, actually. You'll have a harder time finding a Libertarian that supports changing the Constitution through single-man EOs than you will a Republican.
Tread carefully. Your authoritarian slant is showing.
My, my. Aren't we sour over getting caught being the farthest thing from Republican today?
Don't throw your ill lifes choices at me because you can't get what you want. Caught? Far from or close enough, who cares? Lol
Let's be clear here.
You do not care if an EO is the origin point of a Constitutional Amendment addition, alteration or retraction. The established process of legally changing the Constitution doesn't mean anything to you, you would rather it be in the hands of ONE person. ONE.
That is not how Democracies, or Republics work. GTFO here.
originally posted by: Arnie123
Cool story, if it pisses you off, Awesome.
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Oh, salty are we? I stated what I wanted and also what I WANT which I recieved 😌
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Sure, like everybody else 🤐 , psst, you're spilling water 😌
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Really? It means nothing to leftist, but suddenly it matter whens conservatives talk about it? Lol, give me a break Nyiah, you hold water for leftist and expect us to drink from it, keep your koolaid to yourself.
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Tell that to barry 😏
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Arnie123
Who cares, that's what I what. Patiotism still exist, I'm a nationalist so I'm all for love and respect of MY country.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123
You do not have to love and respect the country to be a citizen. Give me a break.
Tough cookies, nobody cares about when you want if it's a "by any means" circumvention to achieve it.
I say again -- there exists a process for amending. EOs are not it. THAT should make any "patriot's" blood run more than a little cold to ponder in place of that process.
Oh and I care what I want, because, I GOT WHAT I WANT 😌
MY POTUS, Repubs in power, you got nothing, keep grasping yo.
Ah, I see. The Constitution then ultimately means nothing to you and your rights at the end of the day, it's just something to control others with, when it suits you. Never mind the legitimate process, let's go balls to the wall and let the amendments be applied and retracted at the whim of any given president's itchy EO finger, actual legitimate process be damned.
Some patriot you are.
Libertarian, actually. You'll have a harder time finding a Libertarian that supports changing the Constitution through single-man EOs than you will a Republican.
Tread carefully. Your authoritarian slant is showing.
My, my. Aren't we sour over getting caught being the farthest thing from Republican today?
Don't throw your ill lifes choices at me because you can't get what you want. Caught? Far from or close enough, who cares? Lol
Let's be clear here.
You do not care if an EO is the origin point of a Constitutional Amendment addition, alteration or retraction. The established process of legally changing the Constitution doesn't mean anything to you, you would rather it be in the hands of ONE person. ONE.
That is not how Democracies, or Republics work. GTFO here.