The British #MeToo scandal which cannot be revealed

Looks like the pos wasted his money on his lawyers!

Philip Green has been named in Parliament as the man hiding behind the super injunction , it may be super but it's no match for Parliamentary privilege.

Couldn't happen to a nicer bloke.


www.bbc.co.uk...

a reply to: gortex

Well caught!
Can’t say I’m surprised, the odious tick.

a reply to: RitualReality

"Odious tick" - I like that. Can I borrow it?

I was really hoping it was him. Can't wait for the sordid details. Why has he still got his Knighthood?

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: RitualReality

Why has he still got his Knighthood?

Every time they go for him, he moves his boat.

The cheeky swine!

ETA:

Have to say though, is anyone surprised?

a reply to: Flavian

I hope it sinks!

a reply to: oldcarpy

Haha be my guest!

In his case I’d be happy for a huge asset seizure (especially that damn yacht) and use the proceeds to compensate victims - if indeed the allegations can be proven true.

a reply to: RitualReality

That yacht:

Wiki: Lionheart

£100 million. Not at all jealous (honest) but even so, that is obscene.

Did he ever plug the hole in the BHS pension fund?

It would be interesting to hear from the Yanks on here who keep claiming that our Parliament cracks down on free speech and that we don't have any free speech etc.

Here we have Parliament in the form of Lord Hain using it's powers of privilege (free speech) to name names without fear or favour and in spite of a Court gagging order.

Over to you ill informed Yanks - put that in your pipe and smoke it!

a reply to: oldcarpy

Takes the name of Richard I grossly in vain. Blech.

Did I read last year he’d thrown £300m at the BHS black hole? Seems a token gesture.

I love the minuscule amount of F’s Lord Hain has given in exposing Green. I have my misgivings about the House of Lords and the peerage system, but he gets a thumbs up from me.

It phillip green.

It my OP. Ohio boy here. You got a problem with me? Oldfart?


a reply to: oldcarpy

originally posted by: lakenheath24
Ohio

a reply to: oldcarpy

Isn't that what dwarfs sing?

a reply to: Flavian

No thats seeet home alabama.

originally posted by: RitualReality
a reply to: oldcarpy

Haha be my guest!

In his case I’d be happy for a huge asset seizure (especially that damn yacht) and use the proceeds to compensate victims - if indeed the allegations can be proven true.

Three Yachts !! Money can't by him anonymity.

a reply to: lakenheath24

No problem with you. I was referring to the ill informed Yanks who were all over the Tommy Robinson threads saying we Brits have no free speech etc.

While I don't agree with what Sir Green did, or indeed, is doing, what I don't understand is how despite the Magna Carta which says that nobody is above the law, a Lord in the house of Lords can ignore a court injunction, and name the person involved.

At the very least that Lord should now go down for contempt of court. Anything less means that the Lords and MP's are indeed above the law of the land.