Out of the bag: Feinstein admits Kavanaugh’s gun views an issue

Prior to passing his first big hurdle on a 51-49 Senate cloture vote Friday morning, Supreme Court Nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh was once again lambasted by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) over his “extreme view on guns.”

“When I asked Judge Kavanaugh about his views that if a gun is in common use it cannot be regulated,” Sen. Feinstein recalled, “he replied this way, and I quote, ‘There are millions and millions and millions of semiautomatic rifles that are possessed so that seems to fit common use and not be a dangerous and unusual weapon.’”

Here come's the boom. Ready or not.

This isn't made up people.

This isn't some 'right wing conspiracy'.

Make no effing mistake. It's Kavanaughs politics.

I like Kavanugh all the more on his opinion on gun regulation!

Listen to the idiot Feinsteins own words.

From C-span.

Feinstein on C-span and doom porn blah,blah,blah

With the left acting bat snip whacko. There's never been a time in American history do we ever need the right to self defense.

I retort.

YOU decide.

a reply to: neo96

So all weapons are under attack by her it sounds like.

a reply to: neo96

This is why the Leftist Authoritarian Party has gone insane.

The Evil Death Queen Hillary the Bloodless, did not win and was unable to stack the court with anti-Constitutionalist activist communists.

a reply to: neo96

Guns aren't the problem.

Our society is the problem.

Fix that and there won't be a "gun problem".

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Of course, they are.

She's been honest in that over the years, at least... She doesn't want anyone, other than her security, or the cops, to have access to any guns, at all, ever.

So, Kavanaugh is on the right side there, anyway. Point to him.

a reply to: neo96

Feinstein's reputation has been crushed this year, her legacy with a non leftist SCOTUS in control is about to follow suit. 26 years as a US Senator... about to be left with not one GD thing to show for it. The court, once Kavanaugh is confirmed this weekend, will undoubtedly hear the pile of 2nd Amendment related cases Thomas convinced the Republican nominated justices to hold off on while Kennedy was around thanks to Kennedy's wishy-washy stance on the 2nd. Included in those cases are a handful that will destroy the remaining tatters of Feinstein's legacy, including the fascist-born gun laws in the state of California. Welcome to watching most of what you've supported get ruled "Unconstitutional," Dianne... Couldn't happen to a more deserving person, either.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: neo96

So all weapons are under attack by her it sounds like.

Why didn't Feinstein petition Obama or Clinton or Johnson or Kennedy or Roosevelt to ban guns? She's been in power for decades. I bet Feinstein's Chinese Spy Driver carried a weapon during the 30 years she covered for him.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: neo96

So all weapons are under attack by her it sounds like.

Why didn't Feinstein petition Obama or Clinton or Johnson or Kennedy or Roosevelt to ban guns? She's been in power for decades. I bet Feinstein's Chinese Spy Driver carried a weapon during the 30 years she covered for him.

Look up her record,she has done everything in her power to destroy the second amendment.And she also has had a carry permit for herself.Totalitarian privilege I guess

Kavanaugh rejected the use of a test that balanced the state’s interest in public safety with the right to bear arms. Instead, he called on gun laws to be weighed based on “text, history, and tradition” and “by appropriate analogues thereto when dealing with modern weapons and new circumstances.”In short, Kavanaugh’s test asks whether a gun law or regulation has been historically or traditionally accepted, instead of deciding whether a local, state, or federal government’s interest in public safety outweighs constitutional protections for gun ownership.

www.vox.com...

Damn him all to hell!

He's unfit to sit on the bench!

The nerve of that guy!

a reply to: neo96
Power grab. We all know they want to stack the court to outlaw guns. They can't legislate from office so they must legislate from the courts. Her own words betray her. One more thing...........shouldn't she be in jail along with her little spy buddy?

On the historical and traditional grounds, Kavanaugh argued that the ban on semiautomatic rifles and handgun registration requirements are unconstitutional. He reasoned that semiautomatic rifles “have not traditionally been banned and are in common use by law-abiding citizens for self-defense in the home, hunting, and other lawful uses.”

www.vox.com...

Hold on Hold on Hold on!

LOL

Why is this news to some of you that a Democratic Senator would find a Republican's views on Guns concerning?

Did you just wake up from a 20 year coma? LOL

In other breaking news, Republicans are concerned about Democrat immigration plans. LOL

This entire sideshow has always been about the 2nd. The abortion thing is nonsense, a ruse to whip up the emotions of the cattle on the left.

a reply to: neo96

She's an idiot, plain and simple.

It's like she doesn't understand the definition of the word "and."

For decades they mocked us when we said the Second Amendment is needed in case of a tyrannical government.

Now here we are .

a reply to: amazing

It's not news per say, but it's good to have those quotes on hand for the talking point that they just want "common sense gun laws".

a reply to: SlapMonkey

Thank you for the opportunity, I’ve been dying to post this.

Full disclosure this isn’t mine I borrowed it .

Diane Feinstein is crazier than a paranoid schizophrenic with a megaphone hollerin at a manic depressive that’s hallucinating while holding a shotgun.

So the assault allegations have sunk, back to the attitude and guns debate.

Sexual Assault Rifle ban anyone?

a reply to: Butterfinger

I just started a go fund me account to buy a machine gun.