It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: TerraLiga
Question 3: Is 5.5 billion years enough time to produce the variety of elements required to produce the matter to statistically create more than one planet to support advanced multicellular life?
I just dont get how time produces elements, how does that work
originally posted by: WUNK22
Ok my head is spinning!! The universe is to much for my human mind to comprehend,,,,,wait I’m a space man!! You guys have got it all wrong.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: TerraLiga
Question 3: Is 5.5 billion years enough time to produce the variety of elements required to produce the matter to statistically create more than one planet to support advanced multicellular life?
I just dont get how time produces elements, how does that work
and No, this is not a religious post, please put away your swords.
originally posted by: TerraLiga
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: TerraLiga
Question 3: Is 5.5 billion years enough time to produce the variety of elements required to produce the matter to statistically create more than one planet to support advanced multicellular life?
I just dont get how time produces elements, how does that work
and No, this is not a religious post, please put away your swords.
Time doesn’t produce mass, supernovae do. Billions or more likely, many trillions of stars had to die to create even the visible mass we calculate in our universe. It would have taken many billions of big supernova just to create Earth.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: TerraLiga
Question 3: Is 5.5 billion years enough time to produce the variety of elements required to produce the matter to statistically create more than one planet to support advanced multicellular life?
I just dont get how time produces elements, how does that work
and No, this is not a religious post, please put away your swords.
originally posted by: Parishna
And more than that, when the big bang spread matter into every corner of an expanding, infinite universe...
originally posted by: Toolman18
a reply to: TerraLiga
And our universe is expanding, right? What's it expanding in to?
The universe might wrap around itself in a higher dimension in the same way that the 2D surface of a sphere wraps around itself in three dimensions.
The number of protons in the nucleus defines to what chemical element the atom belongs: for example, all copper atoms contain 29 protons. The number of neutrons defines the isotope of the element. The number of electrons influences the magnetic properties of an atom. Atoms can attach to one or more other atoms by chemical bonds to form chemical compounds such as molecules. The ability of atoms to associate and dissociate is responsible for most of the physical changes observed in nature and is the subject of the discipline of chemistry.
Hydrogen is a chemical element with symbol H and atomic number 1. With a standard atomic weight of 1.008, hydrogen is the lightest element on the periodic table. Its monatomic form (H) is the most abundant chemical substance in the Universe, constituting roughly 75% of all baryonic mass.[7][note 1] Non-remnant stars are mainly composed of hydrogen in the plasma state. The most common isotope of hydrogen, termed protium (name rarely used, symbol 1H), has one proton and no neutrons.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Parishna
So alchemy is a scientific fact, really
Oh no, deny ignorance or embrace it?
originally posted by: Toolman18
a reply to: TerraLigaseriously
Explain how these things even were created. Why is hydrogen even hydrogen. What created these things?
originally posted by: Toolman18
Explain how these things even were created. Why is hydrogen even hydrogen. What created these things?
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: Parishna
And more than that, when the big bang spread matter into every corner of an expanding, infinite universe...
Not exactly. The Big Bang (as the theory goes) did not spread matter into every corner of the universe, per se, because there was no universe in which to spread matter. And when I say "no universe", I mean no fabric of space-time in which we (the stuff that makes us) could exist.
According to the theory, the universe and all the stuff in it all expanded together after the Big Bang.
That is to say, the Big Bang was not an explosion that sent the stuff everywhere through the universe, but was an expansion of the universe itself (a universe full of stuff).