It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I Am an Independent, Impartial Judge
Yes, I was emotional last Thursday. I hope everyone can understand I was there as a son, husband and dad.
I was deeply honored to stand at the White House July 9 with my wife, Ashley, and my daughters, Margaret and Liza, to accept President Trump’s nomination to succeed my former boss and mentor, Justice Anthony Kennedy, on the Supreme Court. My mom, Martha—one of the first women to serve as a Maryland prosecutor and trial judge, and my inspiration to become a lawyer—sat in the audience with my dad, Ed.
That night, I told the American people who I am and what I believe. I talked about my 28-year career as a lawyer, almost all of which has been in public service. I talked about my 12 years as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, often called the second most important court in the country, and my five years of service in the White House for President George W. Bush. I talked about my long record of advancing and promoting women, including as a judge—a majority of my 48 law clerks have been women—and as a longtime coach of girls’ basketball teams.
As I explained that night, a good judge must be an umpire—a neutral and impartial arbiter who favors no political party, litigant or policy. As Justice Kennedy has stated, judges do not make decisions to reach a preferred result. Judges make decisions because the law and the Constitution compel the result. Over the past 12 years, I have ruled sometimes for the prosecution and sometimes for criminal defendants, sometimes for workers and sometimes for businesses, sometimes for environmentalists and sometimes for coal miners. In each case, I have followed the law. I do not decide cases based on personal or policy preferences. I am not a pro-plaintiff or pro-defendant judge. I am not a pro-prosecution or pro-defense judge. I am a pro-law judge.
...
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: DBCowboy
Still he is An authoritarian, not the kinda guy I would have thought you would support...
That night, I told the American people who I am and what I believe.
I talked about my 28-year career as a lawyer, almost all of which has been in public service.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Sookiechacha
Don't worry, "Dr Ford" is writing a new paper that uses the best techniques in psychoanalysis and lie detector mythology.
😃
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: loam
Oh! Independent, impartial and humble! Sorry, too little too late.
That night, I told the American people who I am and what I believe.
He told us who he was last Thursday alright. When someone tells you who they are, believe them the first time.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Sookiechacha
Don't worry, "Dr Ford" is writing a new paper that uses the best techniques in psychoanalysis and lie detector mythology.
😃
The funniest part of all this is that the Democrats claim his behavior reflected an inability to remain impartial,
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Agree2Disagree
The funniest part of all this is that the Democrats claim his behavior reflected an inability to remain impartial,
It wasn't his behavior. It was his words.
originally posted by: neo96
I'll take Brett Kavanugh over snip hats like this any day.
www.breitbart.com...
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Agree2Disagree
The funniest part of all this is that the Democrats claim his behavior reflected an inability to remain impartial,
It wasn't his behavior. It was his words.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Sookiechacha
Don't worry, "Dr Ford" is writing a new paper that uses the best techniques in psychoanalysis and lie detector mythology.
😃