Blasey arrest record possibly scrubbed July 7....

Any folks in Catawba County NC that can confirm by going to records to look this up?

Apparently Blasey was arrested a few time in NC. One being June 17, 1985. It was apparently a criminal arrest and the record was changed...get this...July 7th 2018....




www.thegatewaypundit.com...

This would have been soon after she graduated high school....and I'm not sure where she went right after but it appears it was NC.

Birthday is correct as is her address for home in MD.

Would love to see if anyone nearby can confirm.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Did they think no one would actually look for this stuff?
These guys are the worst.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Proof she was violated!

a reply to: Vasa Croe

The day after she contacted Sen. Eshoo.

Nope nothing suspicious about that.

So she went to undergrad at UNC Chapel Hill....puts her at least in the state at the time.

One of her other records was a misdemeanor a few days prior.

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Vasa Croe

The day after she contacted Sen. Eshoo.

Nope nothing suspicious about that.

Yep...that is really odd....

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Vasa Croe

The day after she contacted Sen. Eshoo.

Nope nothing suspicious about that.

Yep...that is really odd....

what's odd is a traffic misdemeanor staying on her record for several decades

my misdemeanor traffic violation was expunged and that was 6 years ago....
she should have had it wiped out...like most people do

Is the first picture supposed to be the original?

She has apparently lied under oath.

That's the biggie.

We really don't need any other additional information unless it's soooper damning.

a reply to: odzeandennz

I think it probably depends on the state or even the county.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

mmmmm....something doesn't seem right. If this happened in 1985, why would they update her age and address decades later?
This was traffic violation [ 87 in a 55!! ] but I don't see why they would keep track of her after this long, much update her info.
Not defending her btw, just seems odd.

a reply to: DAVID64

I was wondering why her age was listed as 51 if this was a report from 1985.

Well, she was only 19 at the time.

The timing is strange though. What could have been bad enough that they felt the need to expunge an infraction from the age of 19?
Unless perhaps she was convicted of falsely accusing someone of something, I can't see that anything else would be relevant.

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: Vasa Croe

mmmmm....something doesn't seem right. If this happened in 1985, why would they update her age and address decades later?
This was traffic violation [ 87 in a 55!! ] but I don't see why they would keep track of her after this long, much update her info.
Not defending her btw, just seems odd.

It appears whomever searched it used an online database that updated age or likely whatever information it could find based on the input of the user.

I had the same thought which was why I was hoping someone on ATS may live close to the court house. They have a kiosk set up for digital public records searches and could quickly confirm based on the case number.

originally posted by: odzeandennz

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Vasa Croe

The day after she contacted Sen. Eshoo.

Nope nothing suspicious about that.

Yep...that is really odd....

what's odd is a traffic misdemeanor staying on her record for several decades

my misdemeanor traffic violation was expunged and that was 6 years ago....
she should have had it wiped out...like most people do

It may not necessarily stay on her record per se.....but could be kept in public records.

Hell...I had someone ask me about a misdemeanor traffic ticket I had in high school in 1993....and that was in 2007.

Was a DUI a misdemeanor or felony back then?

Someone went to a lot of trouble for this accusation. Cleaning up criminal records, wiping out social media, purging yearbooks from the Internet.

This is NOT a normal situation.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

I take the gateway pundit with a grain of salt, as many news outlets out there, they take their political inclination pretty serious and usually mix up emotion with facts. I never saw any fake news or headlines that had to be retracted, I just think they tend to exaggerate a little.

If this is true, it should be the end of this story. Honestly, how deep does it go? Can it get any low now?

This is SO embarrassing, I would be ashamed if I were a voting Democrat.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Someone went to a lot of trouble for this accusation. Cleaning up criminal records, wiping out social media, purging yearbooks from the Internet.

This is NOT a normal situation.

It probably wouldn't be that difficult for a senator to accomplish.

So the Democrats expect us to take the word and nothing but the word (because you know, no evidence and all that) of a criminal over that of a judge who has sat on the 2nd highest court on the land?

A criminal? Really?