Julie Swetnick, a Brett Kavanaugh accuser, faced misconduct allegations at Portland company

o_O looks like one of Kavanaugh's wackiest accusers was exposed as a dirty little cheater herself.

Apparently a lawsuit was filed by a (former) employer of hers and was thrown out of court.

Julie Swetnick (or is it Julie Sweatneck) was accused of lying and some sexual stuff !!!!

Very dirty little girl and mean and bitter and jealous it seems.

Definitely another mental case on the stage.

Julie Swetnick, a Brett Kavanaugh accuser, faced misconduct allegations at Portland company

Julie Swetnick, one of the women accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct, faced allegations of her own misconduct during a short stint at a Portland tech company 18 years ago.

In the suit, Webtrends alleged Swetnick claimed to have graduated from Johns Hopkins University but the company said it subsequently learned the school had no record of her attendance. Webtrends said she also "falsely described her work experience" at a prior employer.

The suit also alleges Swetnick "engaged in unwelcome, sexually offensive conduct" while at Webtrends and "made false and retaliatory allegations that other co-workers had engaged in inappropriate conduct toward her."

The suit alleges Swetnick "engaged in unwelcome sexual innuendo and inappropriate conduct" directed at two male employees during a business lunch, with Webtrends customers present. Swetnick claimed two other employees had sexually harassed her, according to the suit.

The lawsuit was dismissed....so all I see is more unprovable bs. I need facts. Where the !@#$ are they?

A2D

I don't think it matters. She will not be part of the investigation.

originally posted by: Agree2Disagree
The lawsuit was dismissed....so all I see is more unprovable bs. I need facts. Where the !@#$ are they?

A2D

Well , it was the Cali wannabe State of Oregon...in Portland nonetheless
You have to take all into consideration before "judging".

originally posted by: Daedal
I don't think it matters. She will not be part of the investigation.

Yeah , did not want to testify under oath

a reply to: Gothmog

I'm just upset I can't find hard evidence of anything. Forgive me lol

A2D

a reply to: xuenchen

Sounds like she became really screwed up because of that sexual assault by Kavanaugh those many years ago.

Guess it shows how that can effect people years later huh!

What a tool you are! I wonder what happened to you oh so many years ago.

originally posted by: Agree2Disagree
The lawsuit was dismissed....so all I see is more unprovable bs. I need facts. Where the !@#$ are they?

A2D

ive seen a lot of unproveable bs and allegations with no facts somewhere recently.

if only i could remember where

a reply to: TinySickTears

No kidding. That's all we seem to get anywhere these days. No facts just bs bs bs.

A2D

Really don't you know the rules by now. We can never questions the intent or the motives of a victim. They must be BELIEVED, no questions asked and whatever they have done in their past makes no difference.

If you bring that stuff up you are a bully an part of the patriarchy and you need to just shut up!

originally posted by: toolgal462
Really don't you know the rules by now. We can never questions the intent or the motives of a victim. They must be BELIEVED, no questions asked and whatever they have done in their past makes no difference.

If you bring that stuff up you are a bully an part of the patriarchy and you need to just shut up!

You mean, like this?

a reply to: Krakatoa

EXACTLY like that!

a reply to: Gothmog

Portland is in Oregon... geez

BTW their moto is Keep Portland Wierd, so it seems she was too wierd for even Portland.

originally posted by: Xtrozero
a reply to: Gothmog

Portland is in Oregon... geez

BTW their moto is Keep Portland Wierd, so it seems she was too wierd for even Portland.

Forgive me
Not had my first cup of coffee
Thanks and fixed

Portland/Seattle/San Fran---no difference

Here's the little darling herself......

'I just want the facts to come out:' Avenatti client and 3rd Kavanaugh accuser gives first on-camera interview, says investigation is needed for a lifetime seat

a reply to: Tompdx3

She says Kavanaugh never assaulted her. Aren't we supposed to believe her?

Apparently a lawsuit was filed by a (former) employer of hers and was thrown out of court.

But let's not allow that to get in the way of a good smear campaign. You'll believe it though. Pathetic.

a reply to: intrepid

I thought we were supposed to believe the accuser and not ask for evidence. I'm confused.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: intrepid

I thought we were supposed to believe the accuser and not ask for evidence. I'm confused.

Depends on the person and what side of the aisle they are on as to who you automatically believe.

a reply to: intrepid

Unfortunately that's not a joke.