It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Shapes of ufo's seen from 2001-2017. Exotic shapes are sought after.
page: 1share:
The numbers of types of ufo's shown in the chart are from the time period of 2001-2017 and from two sources, MUFON and NUFORC.
The main objective was to determine which are exotic shapes, those that most likely may not be man made.
The total of exotic shapes described in this time frame were a whopping 45,894.
1ut4jnm5m10oxrax2wal0104-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com...
source
The main objective was to determine which are exotic shapes, those that most likely may not be man made.
The total of exotic shapes described in this time frame were a whopping 45,894.
Let’s take a look at a recent analysis I did that is ruthless in its removal of questionable UFO shapes. For the purpose of this study I have eliminated any UFO shapes that either could not be clearly described or shapes that might easily be viewed as man-made. I caution my readers to not be emotionally attached to a favorite shape I’ve excluded. I eliminated all undefined shapes as well as triangles; yes, I know they are as big as a football field, and they could be an experimental TR-3B, I’m told regularly. Boomerang and Chevrons must also be removed because they reasonably could be some advanced bomber or fighter aircraft. I took out cigar, cylinder, bullet and bullet/missile shapes because most reasonable people would agree that these shapes might be an airliner seen from the side. I think you get my point.
1ut4jnm5m10oxrax2wal0104-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com...
source
edit on 23pm30pm5091 by data5091 because:
insertion
a reply to: data5091
That's an interesting statistic.
To also acquire a number of so-called 'high strangeness cases" that could
not possibly be 'black tech' (unless people stretch it absurdum) would
be interesting.
The other point to bring up, is that anomalous reports go back
thousands of years.. and black technology does not..
But in that case, the black tech fan boys will say that the reports
of anomalous occurrences from the distant past are hallucination
or what not,
while "their reports of black tech causing anomalous seeming
incidents are not".
UFO research is so rough, as people make up their minds, quite
often at least, and THEN start "researching".
Kev
That's an interesting statistic.
To also acquire a number of so-called 'high strangeness cases" that could
not possibly be 'black tech' (unless people stretch it absurdum) would
be interesting.
The other point to bring up, is that anomalous reports go back
thousands of years.. and black technology does not..
But in that case, the black tech fan boys will say that the reports
of anomalous occurrences from the distant past are hallucination
or what not,
while "their reports of black tech causing anomalous seeming
incidents are not".
UFO research is so rough, as people make up their minds, quite
often at least, and THEN start "researching".
Kev
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear
I have one of those high strangeness cases for Yas.....10 or 12 years ago Dallas.... The one by Addison airport.....it was on a thread here at A T S...but this is from early in the sighting from a guy getting on LBJ Eastbound On Marsh.....off Marsh...what he saw right before the military jets was a diamond shape of colored dots at the corners.......morphed into a orb......
IN THE FINE TEXAS TRADITION
I have one of those high strangeness cases for Yas.....10 or 12 years ago Dallas.... The one by Addison airport.....it was on a thread here at A T S...but this is from early in the sighting from a guy getting on LBJ Eastbound On Marsh.....off Marsh...what he saw right before the military jets was a diamond shape of colored dots at the corners.......morphed into a orb......
IN THE FINE TEXAS TRADITION
edit on 23-9-2018 by GBP/JPY because: IN THE FINE TEXAS TRADITION
edit on 23-9-2018 by
GBP/JPY because: IN THE FINE TEXAS TRADITION
edit on 23-9-2018 by GBP/JPY because: IN THE FINE TEXAS TRADITION
I'm surprised Manta craft weren't mentioned.
My one sighting in Texas.
My one sighting in Texas.
I note there's no entry for 'spiral shapes' or wormholes. Good for you.
a reply to: data5091
The spheres circles and lights make up many of the sighting which points towards them being pretty much ufo orbs and lots of them. Even the other major sighting triangles can usually be attributed to three ufo orbs flying in formation, not all of them for sure particularly the ones from here but some of them well yes.
The spheres circles and lights make up many of the sighting which points towards them being pretty much ufo orbs and lots of them. Even the other major sighting triangles can usually be attributed to three ufo orbs flying in formation, not all of them for sure particularly the ones from here but some of them well yes.
originally posted by: GBP/JPY
I have one of those high strangeness cases for Yas.....10 or 12 years ago Dallas.... The one by Addison airport.....it was on a thread here at A T S...but this is from early in the sighting from a guy getting on LBJ Eastbound On Marsh.....off Marsh...what he saw right before the military jets was a diamond shape of colored dots at the corners.......morphed into a orb......
IN THE FINE TEXAS TRADITION
...Where the stars are big and bright...
I've seen more strangeness in the skies above DFW than I have anywhere else, ever. From rarely seen military transports to Iridium flares to odd structures flying above the metroplex on clear sunny days. I wonder why more people here don't report weird sightings but no one looks up from their phone anymore and with such heavy air traffic, every light in the sky is assumed to be another jetliner.
edit on 24/9/2018 by ParticleNode because: Text OCD
edit on 24/9/2018 by ParticleNode because: (no reason given)
a reply to: GENERAL EYES
Hi Geeral Eyes I'm not disputing your sighting when I ask this............... Can you be 90% sure what you witnessed above was not just a fleet of multi coloured ufo orbs, like could you see a outlined definite shape / silhouette above?
Hi Geeral Eyes I'm not disputing your sighting when I ask this............... Can you be 90% sure what you witnessed above was not just a fleet of multi coloured ufo orbs, like could you see a outlined definite shape / silhouette above?
a reply to: GENERAL EYES
very cool. Looks somewhat like the ufo's that were seen in the air over Mount Rainier here in Washington State by a pilot back in the late 40's, also somewhat like alien craft in film, "Robinson Carusoe on Mars," one of my favorites. Where and when did you see this type of ufo??
very cool. Looks somewhat like the ufo's that were seen in the air over Mount Rainier here in Washington State by a pilot back in the late 40's, also somewhat like alien craft in film, "Robinson Carusoe on Mars," one of my favorites. Where and when did you see this type of ufo??
edit on
24pm30pm5091 by data5091 because: insertion
a reply to: ufoorbhunter
I've only seen the spheres. The triangle/delta/manta/ whatever it was in Cornwall was definitely terrestrial and completely silent.
It's the spheres that don't belong to us. I wonder if we'll ever know for sure.
I've only seen the spheres. The triangle/delta/manta/ whatever it was in Cornwall was definitely terrestrial and completely silent.
It's the spheres that don't belong to us. I wonder if we'll ever know for sure.
a reply to: ufoorbhunter
a reply to: data5091
My sighting was close range hovering over the ground.
Close encounter to be sure. Even saw beings.
My testimony is in RATS.
2003 Personal Close Encounter
a reply to: data5091
My sighting was close range hovering over the ground.
Close encounter to be sure. Even saw beings.
My testimony is in RATS.
2003 Personal Close Encounter
edit on 9/24/18 by GENERAL EYES because: added link
originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: ufoorbhunter
I've only seen the spheres. The triangle/delta/manta/ whatever it was in Cornwall was definitely terrestrial and completely silent.
It's the spheres that don't belong to us. I wonder if we'll ever know for sure.
What if the spheres are the ufo mothership type craft we see? Even the triangles? I read somewhere that the spheres / orbs are how the craft shrink down when near the Earth's surface. It's all guesswork really as we both never went any further than making visual contact with them. If I had the nerve it would be great to go out and make contact with them, but when you're young you sort of have a crazy who cares attitude, dunno if I still have the nerve to go and risk abduction just to make contact again.................. I know where to make contact if needed but maybe it's just best to sit on the keyboard these days and theorise about them? They don't half play on the mind though
originally posted by: data5091
a reply to: GENERAL EYES
very cool. Looks somewhat like the ufo's that were seen in the air over Mount Rainier here in Washington State by a pilot back in the late 40's
Oh, that bloke.
Kenneth Arnold, at the end of his life, turned to a Vallee-style hypothesis, insisting his sighting over Mt Rainier was a set of nine inter-dimensional living beings rather than craft. So, yeah, living alien manta rays is one POV.
also somewhat like alien craft in film, "Robinson Carusoe on Mars," one of my favorites.
Good fun film.
Producer George Pal was inspired by his own Martian machines designed for the 'War Of The Worlds' movie he made eleven years earlier in 1953.
They're really sexy, ain't they? Just don't wanna meet one in reality!
edit on 24-9-2018 by ConfusedBrit because: Spelinggk
a reply to: ConfusedBrit
Would you have a link to information about Kenneth Arnold
in his later life and his view about those 'beings'?
In his earlier life, there seems to be no evidence that he
fancied the occult..but if what you say is true..
perhaps he always was of that opinion.
Thanks,
Kev
Would you have a link to information about Kenneth Arnold
in his later life and his view about those 'beings'?
In his earlier life, there seems to be no evidence that he
fancied the occult..but if what you say is true..
perhaps he always was of that opinion.
Thanks,
Kev
edit on 24-9-2018 by KellyPrettyBear because: (no reason given)
originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: ConfusedBrit
Would you have a link to information about Kenneth Arnold
in his later life and his view about those 'beings'?
Hi Kev, I can't link from the device I'm using at this moment, but will do it tomorrow.
Alternatively, 1977 is the key year if you fancy searching in the meantime.
a reply to: ConfusedBrit
Sure.
But holy 30 year revisionism Batman!
Ah.. probably this link:
www.ufoevidence.org...
If this guy saw something similar to what I and others have seen,
for some reason, everyone seems to feel that 'they are alive'.
Could be anthopomorphism I suppose.
But no evidence of Kenneth Arnold believing in the occult that
I see.
Thanks for the magic number 1977.
Kev
Sure.
But holy 30 year revisionism Batman!
Ah.. probably this link:
www.ufoevidence.org...
If this guy saw something similar to what I and others have seen,
for some reason, everyone seems to feel that 'they are alive'.
Could be anthopomorphism I suppose.
But no evidence of Kenneth Arnold believing in the occult that
I see.
Thanks for the magic number 1977.
Kev
edit on 24-9-2018 by KellyPrettyBear because: (no reason given)