The public trial of the evil rapist Kavanaugh

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Kharron


Bull.

Tell a lie big enough and long enough and people will believe it.

Someone evil said that. Don't remember who, but it's probably in the Congressional handbook during freshman orientation.

Well, your mind is set it seems. You've already cleared him of everything in your mind.

We can all be thankful that's not how the law works.

I am leaving my opinion open on this until we see where it goes. I am open to him being innocent and that she may be lying, and I am equally open to her speaking the truth and him lying about it to all of us.

We shall see, I'm not ready to make up my mind yet. I need more information for that.

Take it easy, DB.

originally posted by: Artemis06

originally posted by: DBCowboy
I just finished reading an article from the Washington Post (Where truth died in a broom closet).

www.washingtonpost.com... b942340-bdb1-11e8-8792-78719177250f_story.html?utm_term=.f9acbaf4500a

Kavanaugh is already guilty of the crime of rape. Game over man, game over.

There is no presumption of innocence. None.

He's a rapist who ruined a girls life and who will have to leave the country if he is nominated because she can't live in a country where evil rapists sit on the Supreme Court.

This is coming from the media. They don't even pretend to be objective any more.

Kavanaugh is guilty. The threats of rape against his wife and daughters is ignored, because some broad says he attacked her 36 years ago.

He has been tried and has been found guilty in the leftist kangaroo court of public opinion.


What hope do any of us have in this brave new world of mass media manipulation and having them determine what are facts?

We are being told what to believe.

And that is it. There is no other choice. There is no other option. Believe what they believe, think how they think, act how they want us to act, or suffer the consequences in their damning kangaroo court of mass media.

First off I agree that all of the crazy “ anyone who accuses my political opposition of a crime must be telling the truth no matter how hackish of a source it comes from” nonsense..


Didn’t I watch every mainstream republican including everyone on ats do precisely thesame thing to bill Clinton , al franken , exc??

Those incidents you mention happened within the time frame of evidence to be shown. Or maybe you don't believe in evidence.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Kharron

He said he didn't do fit.


She said he did.


One of them is lying.

Presumption of innocence must conclude that she is, unless she has proof.

And only one is a far left Trump Hating political activist.

originally posted by: Malcador

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Kharron

He said he didn't do fit.


She said he did.


One of them is lying.

Presumption of innocence must conclude that she is, unless she has proof.

And only one is a far left Trump Hating political activist.

Bet you dollars to donuts she has a pussy hat some where in her possession.

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: DBCowboy


Presumption of innocence must conclude that she is, unless she has proof.

so lets give her a chance to prove it

what do you say?

Therein lies the rub. She cannot in any way prove that this happened. No evidence. No paper trail. Nothing.

Her word against his and since she is a far left political activist I seriously doubt her honesty here.

In fact I think she is a liar and this whole thing is nothing more than a political hit job.

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: DBCowboy


Presumption of innocence must conclude that she is, unless she has proof.

so lets give her a chance to prove it

what do you say?

Therein lies the rub. She cannot in any way prove that this happened. No evidence. No paper trail. Nothing.

Her word against his and since she is a far left political activist I seriously doubt her honesty here.

In fact I think she is a liar and this whole thing is nothing more than a political hit job.

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: DBCowboy


Presumption of innocence must conclude that she is, unless she has proof.

so lets give her a chance to prove it

what do you say?

Therein lies the rub. She cannot in any way prove that this happened. No evidence. No paper trail. Nothing.

Her word against his and since she is a far left political activist I seriously doubt her honesty here.

In fact I think she is a liar and this whole thing is nothing more than a political hit job.

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: DBCowboy


Presumption of innocence must conclude that she is, unless she has proof.

so lets give her a chance to prove it

what do you say?

Therein lies the rub. She cannot in any way prove that this happened. No evidence. No paper trail. Nothing.

Her word against his and since she is a far left political activist I seriously doubt her honesty here.

In fact I think she is a liar and this whole thing is nothing more than a political hit job.

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: DBCowboy


Presumption of innocence must conclude that she is, unless she has proof.

so lets give her a chance to prove it

what do you say?

Therein lies the rub. She cannot in any way prove that this happened. No evidence. No paper trail. Nothing.

Her word against his and since she is a far left political activist I seriously doubt her honesty here.

In fact I think she is a liar and this whole thing is nothing more than a political hit job.

originally posted by: Malcador

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: DBCowboy


Presumption of innocence must conclude that she is, unless she has proof.

so lets give her a chance to prove it

what do you say?

Therein lies the rub. She cannot in any way prove that this happened. No evidence. No paper trail. Nothing.

Her word against his and since she is a far left political activist I seriously doubt her honesty here.

In fact I think she is a liar and this whole thing is nothing more than a political hit job.

I started everyone of your 1488902829 posts just because I fully agree with all 838858939198 of them.

a reply to: Malcador

We know it's an echo chamber, even without your demonstration.

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: Malcador

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Kharron

He said he didn't do fit.


She said he did.


One of them is lying.

Presumption of innocence must conclude that she is, unless she has proof.

And only one is a far left Trump Hating political activist.

Bet you dollars to donuts she has a pussy hat some where in her possession.

She was one of the marches. Shes on the board of some organization that's funded by Soros. Her brother works for a law firm that's closely tied to Fusion GPS. She scrubbed her social media. Cant remember any details. Even though he though he was going to kill her (lol) and never filed a police report etc etc etc etc.

She's a liar.

originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: rollanotherone
if so i don know what it would be

The fact you can say this in all seriousness is astounding. You have to ask why. Have you been living under a rock since 2015?

originally posted by: Kharron
a reply to: Malcador

We know it's an echo chamber, even without your demonstration.

And interestingly enough, you're one of the usual suspects in every thread that concerns our president. Funny, huh?

originally posted by: Malcador

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: Malcador

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Kharron

He said he didn't do fit.


She said he did.


One of them is lying.

Presumption of innocence must conclude that she is, unless she has proof.

And only one is a far left Trump Hating political activist.

Bet you dollars to donuts she has a pussy hat some where in her possession.

She's a liar.

For some reason I read that in Dave Mustaine's voice. Don't ask why.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Good luck with this op. You seem to have forgotten that one is guilty until proven innocent. Also, don't forget that the burden of proof is on Kavanaugh.(sarc) I wouldn't want any of these yahoos who think this way on any jury. And our representatives, on the left, are convicting him with no proof.
It's going to be she said he said.
The first question I would ask her is why she scrubbed her social media and who helped her with it.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: DBCowboy

i am watching msnbc right now
they are not saying what you are

they are saying testimony begins next week

so what is wrong with that?

They and other political figures have already tried and convicted Kavanaugh.

The Dems on the Judicial committee didn't even attend Kavanaugh's under oath committee questioning and testimony on this.

THAT'S how certain they are that Kavanaugh is guilty.
So much so...they didn't even want to question him or hear his sworn denial and side of the story.

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: Kharron
a reply to: Malcador

We know it's an echo chamber, even without your demonstration.

And interestingly enough, you're one of the usual suspects in every thread that concerns our president. Funny, huh?

Damn right.

I'm also one of the few remaining who Deny Ignorance and Dissect Disinformation.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Sookiechacha

And all those leftist talking points have been refuted.


But play with your accusations.

Kavanaugh also refutes this sexual assault claim. So what? He says he didn't do it. I don't believe his excuses.

That doesn't help with the people who are considering all the doubtful issues that plague his hearings to evaluate his fitness as a justice of the Supremem Court.

Kavanaugh admits to staggering black out drunk through his most of late highschool years, but he remembers NOT doing this? Yeah right Bart O'Kavanaugh! LOL

double post