It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: CrawlingChaos
But who is going to arrest them? The highest levels of the DOJ are corrupt.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Kharron
False.
You're saying that we should either completely believe the NYT or disbelieve the NYT completely.
Who are you to dictate the veracity of what we should believe or not believe?
I'm sorry... it sounds like you're saying it's good practice to cherry pick what is true and what is not, from the same publisher, based on what you like to hear and what you don't like to hear.
And this is ok to do?
Fail again.
Who are you to determine what we should believe is true and what we should believe is false?
Ok DB, please go back and quote where in this thread I stated this was true or not, or where I stated the letter was true or not. Please point out where I said anything on the veracity of any of this.
Since you won't find those words and you're instead trying to put them in my mouth and make it seem like I said that, I'll explain plainly --
I am simply pointing out the hypocrisy in cherry picking truth, without making any statements on what is and is not true.
But I'll wait for your quote of where I said what you're claiming I said.
You call it "cherry picking".
So every position/story out in the media is either completely correct or completely false according to you, because only opting for the stories that are true is "cherry picking" to you.
Fail again!
So every position/story out in the media is either completely correct or completely false according to you, because only opting for the stories that are true is "cherry picking" to you.
originally posted by: six67seven
a reply to: avgguy
The just keeps getting better.
Man I can't wait for the crescendo.
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: Tempter
Can we ALL NOW AGREE that Trump was and is a surviving victim of the Deep State?
So the letter NYTimes published is correct?
He is viewed as insane and people are actively resisting from within his own cabinet and his WH and trying to remove him?
NYTimes publishes truth?
originally posted by: Thejoncrichton
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: Tempter
Can we ALL NOW AGREE that Trump was and is a surviving victim of the Deep State?
So the letter NYTimes published is correct?
He is viewed as insane and people are actively resisting from within his own cabinet and his WH and trying to remove him?
NYTimes publishes truth?
Which of Trump's policies are "insane"?
It wouldn't be collusion. It would be sedition.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: theantediluvian
So it's okay to "plan" a coup, but to actually carry it out?
Not so much.
You're silly.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: CrawlingChaos
It wouldn't be collusion. It would be sedition.
Sounds serious.
No, it wouldn't be sedition either. If Donald Trump whips out Toad in front of Mike Pence and says, "LOOK MIKEY I'M AN ORANGE UNICORN!" and Mike Pence goes to the members of the cabinet and says, "Look guys, Dear Leader is batpoop! (mother doesn't let him curse) Listen to what he did! We should totes remove him under the 25th!" — that's not sedition.
It's not a crime to question the fitness of the President or discuss it with others, including the cabinet. I'm not 100% positive on this but I don't think it would be inherently illegal to record the President under federal law. And DC has one party consent.
originally posted by: avgguy
“This New York Times report must not be used as a pretext for the corrupt purpose of firing Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein in order to install an official who will allow the president to interfere with the Special Counsel’s investigation.” C.schumer