It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Mental health is a money loser for any institution. Most who have mental health issues aren't ones with stable jobs and good insurance. We're dealing with scores of homeless, people working minimum wage jobs.
Currently hospitals are taking the load of mental health cases and spreading the cost along services that people do pay for.
That's why you'd see a correlation between the rise in medical costs and the shutting down of mental health facilities in the 80's.
Placing mental health back in control of government would actually enable hospitals to reduce operating costs and provide services at a better rate.
So if government took over mental health care, it would provide better blanket services for those who suffer issues AND reduce routine medical costs.
In my opinion.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Mental health is a money loser for any institution. Most who have mental health issues aren't ones with stable jobs and good insurance. We're dealing with scores of homeless, people working minimum wage jobs.
Currently hospitals are taking the load of mental health cases and spreading the cost along services that people do pay for.
That's why you'd see a correlation between the rise in medical costs and the shutting down of mental health facilities in the 80's.
Placing mental health back in control of government would actually enable hospitals to reduce operating costs and provide services at a better rate.
So if government took over mental health care, it would provide better blanket services for those who suffer issues AND reduce routine medical costs.
In my opinion.
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Mental health is a money loser for any institution. Most who have mental health issues aren't ones with stable jobs and good insurance. We're dealing with scores of homeless, people working minimum wage jobs.
Currently hospitals are taking the load of mental health cases and spreading the cost along services that people do pay for.
That's why you'd see a correlation between the rise in medical costs and the shutting down of mental health facilities in the 80's.
Placing mental health back in control of government would actually enable hospitals to reduce operating costs and provide services at a better rate.
So if government took over mental health care, it would provide better blanket services for those who suffer issues AND reduce routine medical costs.
In my opinion.
A lot of the crazies are also in prisons driving up that cost too... the bulk of the chronic homeless also need to be in mental institutions as well.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: BrianFlanders
I'm trying not to put a political spin to this.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: DBCowboy
I've had family members that were put in insane asylums and had electric shock therapy. (for things we'd consider mild these days)
It haunts my family to this day.
We need more mental healthcare. Not necessarily asylums, maybe ongoing preventative care so it doesn't end up like that.
What people don't want to accept, maybe there are some broken people that aren't fixable and they can't function in normal society. There does need to be a place for them. Where is that place?