It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: MRinder
cool
thanks for explaining it
originally posted by: MRinder
Liberals, you just don't get it when it comes to taxes, money, and the the rich. You think taxing the rich is going pay for healthcare, college, and God knows what else. What you need to understand is that taxes are income tax, not wealth tax.
You could tax the income of the three richest men in the United States at 100pct and you would get a little over $175,000 plus 15pct of whatever stock they sold. So if they each sold 100 million in stock a year you would get another $45 million. But they could control that by selling less stock.
To clarify, Jeff Bezos gets paid $80,000/year by Amazon. Warren Buffet - $100,000 from Berkshire Hathaway.
My point is that all of that would be peanuts. So that means the cost of "free" healthcare and college would have to flow down to the middle class. So now instead you and your neighbors would be taxed for like 99 pct of that cost. Do you want your tax rate to soar?
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Conservatives don't get it either. Giving the rich a trillion(s) dollar permanent tax break for the rich and powerful isn't going to solve anything either, those same people conservatives just rewarded permanently are the very same ones who have been paying our politicians to lie to us for decades.
Want corruption in government to end? Rewarding those who bribe government officials isn't going to solve a damn thing and only going to make it worse.
originally posted by: Kharron
a reply to: MRinder
Just one of your examples, Jeff Bezos.
He made $11,500,000 per HOUR this year. You believe he only gets taxed on $80k a year?
originally posted by: MiddleInsite
a reply to: MRinder
What you say in your OP is obvious to anyone with a third grade math level.
It's not about how much you tax, but how fair you tax.
originally posted by: carewemust
An increasing number of level-headed intelligent Liberals are "getting it". The "Walk Away!" movement is growing at an exponential pace/rate.
STORY: www.nbcnews.com...
“Once upon a time, I was a liberal,” Straka says in the six-minute video, looking directly toward the camera. “For years now, I have watched as the left has devolved into intolerant, inflexible, illogical, hateful, misguided, ill-informed, un-American, hypocritical, menacing, callous, ignorant, narrow-minded and, at times, blatantly fascistic behavior and rhetoric.”
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: MRinder
i dont agree or disagree
im not one who talks about taxing rich people to pay for healthcare
im the one that talks about legalizing weed at the federal level and using the tax money from that to pay for healthcare
go ahead and explain why that wont work
originally posted by: MRinder
originally posted by: MiddleInsite
a reply to: MRinder
What you say in your OP is obvious to anyone with a third grade math level.
It's not about how much you tax, but how fair you tax.
Can you give me an example of what you would consider a fair tax?