This is supposedly the reason for the Observatory being shut down last week

Child porn? Not sure, but this story is from the Albuquerque newspaper. I'm still thinking there could be more to this.

According to a search warrant filed in U.S. District Court in Las Cruces, the FBI began investigating after a wireless signal at the observatory, located on Sacramento Peak in the Lincoln National Forest, accessed child porn multiple times since January.

And

The FBI decided to shut down the facility after the chief observer became concerned for his personal safety when the janitor said there was a serial killer in the area and was fearful that the killer might “enter the facility and execute someone.”

www.abqjournal.com...

originally posted by: vlawde
Child porn? Not sure, but this story is from the Albuquerque newspaper. I'm still thinking there could be more to this.

According to a search warrant filed in U.S. District Court in Las Cruces, the FBI began investigating after a wireless signal at the observatory, located on Sacramento Peak in the Lincoln National Forest, accessed child porn multiple times since January.

And

The FBI decided to shut down the facility after the chief observer became concerned for his personal safety when the janitor said there was a serial killer in the area and was fearful that the killer might “enter the facility and execute someone.”

www.abqjournal.com...

So why wasn’t groundskeeper Willy scared about a serial killer on the loose and a fed was...

originally posted by: vlawde
Child porn? Not sure, but this story is from the Albuquerque newspaper. I'm still thinking there could be more to this.

According to a search warrant filed in U.S. District Court in Las Cruces, the FBI began investigating after a wireless signal at the observatory, located on Sacramento Peak in the Lincoln National Forest, accessed child porn multiple times since January.

And

The FBI decided to shut down the facility after the chief observer became concerned for his personal safety when the janitor said there was a serial killer in the area and was fearful that the killer might “enter the facility and execute someone.”

www.abqjournal.com...

So why wasn’t groundskeeper Willy scared about a serial killer on the loose and a fed was...

a reply to: vlawde

Why on earth would the feds monitor content of child porn instead of removing it from the web?

They were seen removing an antenna array.

More like Chinese spying.

Child porn would not require antenna removal.

a reply to: howtonhawky

ever seen To Catch A Predator?

the feds are a 'tricky' bunch

originally posted by: whyamIhere
They were seen removing an antenna array.

More like Chinese spying.

Child porn would not require antenna removal.

This reminds of the movie "Breach"

Under the cover of investigating child porn, the investigation was really following a government traiter.

feds; That's it someone is looking at child porn. No more mail for your community!

Nothing adds up except the observatory being involved in something other than what is listed officially and someone there possibly reached out to others concerning the matter.

a reply to: vlawde

Nothing to do with Aliens & UFO's then ?

Which is the topic you have posted in.

In my opinion, I think it was PsyOps Conspiracy attempt to divert attention away from Q.

a reply to: howtonhawky

If they're using the same techniques they do with "terrorism" then they probably put the cp up in the first place.

So they seem serious in their determination of underage material being there.

I am being herded toward their official statements.

I suppose some of the equipment somehow was storing illegal material and someone found out about it and took a threatening stand against it and that put everyone in danger until the material was removed.

Someone reached out to the feds on the matter.

a reply to: vlawde

Interesting but I was sure I'd read online that it was something to do with China and hacking or spying or something like that.

a reply to: Dwoodward85

Me too, now the article I linked. You may be right, the child porn thing may just be a cover story

I think the real reason, what ever we it is, would make a good episode for The X Files.

a reply to: vlawde

According to a search warrant filed in U.S. District Court in Las Cruces, the FBI began investigating after a wireless signal at the observatory, located on Sacramento Peak in the Lincoln National Forest, accessed child porn multiple times since January.

I am guessing this is a direct quote? "Accessed child porn". Where (figuratively speaking) exactly- not that I want a web address. Does the observatory have its own private stash? Does the FBI? Not "child porn sites", "child porn torrents"- but just "child porn"? It's making me queasy typing that. Moving on....

It's the *statement* that makes me scratch my head. It doesn't make sense, and without context of any sort, it sounds damn fishy. Right on its heels:

The FBI decided to shut down the facility after the chief observer became concerned for his personal safety when the janitor said there was a serial killer in the area and was fearful that the killer might “enter the facility and execute someone.”

That's a hell of a jump from the above, ain't it? And then... there's the janitor, who has been looked into 56 ways to sunday on the huge thread about all of this nonsense. He's fishier than a can of tuna, it seems.

A) It seems child porn IS a go to when the federal govt wants to get someone out of the way they find a true threat to whatever they are up to (and it's disgusting beyond comprehension), and B)- that janitor doesn't make ANY sense. None. None at all. His name is on the warrant to search the place. He's a suspect. He's been camping OUTSIDE the compound (supposedly) for days. His name is ridiculously uncommon. He has next to no internet footprint. (All of this is on the thread HERE at 141+ pages, yet)

This thing gets smellier by the day.

a reply to: mfourl

Why? Q is fake and a psyops conspiracy to keep people chasing their tail.

I remember last week someone on /pol/ with insider information stating that it was child porn related. He gave the context that someone in there (I think part of faculty or janitor) was using the network of the observatory to upload thousands of child porn content every day. There was more to it but I forgot.

Please continue in the existing threads.

All Q discussion go in the Q thread only. Link to Q.

On this topic use this thread please, spinoffs are not allowed. Link