It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kharron
a reply to: Grambler
Do you want an NWO lawyer, who maybe had part in Patriot Act and surveillance of Americans, in Supreme Court for decades to come
originally posted by: norhoc
a reply to: Stormdancer777
and this Mark Judge guy says it didn't happen
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Kharron
a reply to: Grambler
Do you want an NWO lawyer, who maybe had part in Patriot Act and surveillance of Americans, in Supreme Court for decades to come
Why is this relevant?
Should my or anyone else’s feelings on his policies make us more or less willing to believe these allegations?
I hope not.
As far as her having issues in 2012, how do we know what she said then?
She claims she never mentioned Kavanaughs name, and for some reason feels that now it’s important when he is appointed for Supreme Court, yet did not feel it was important when he was just a federal judge.
I have no answers
But I guess we can look forward to rounds of accusers making allegations at 11th hours many times in the future
I just don’t like the precedent that is being set
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: burdman30ott6
If it was a democrat I assume you would say the same thing. Like if it were Obama's nominee
originally posted by: TheLead
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
What's to investigate really though you have high school he said, she said situation. There was one other person, but even with their testimony you couldn't prove anything beyond doubt without admittance. Technically I dont believe there is anything legal to be done at this point so at most there is a civil case lacking in evidence.