It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Fallingdown
If she did commit crimes against Russia. We should extradite her there post haste . I would love to see her sit in a cell in a cell with no friends, deep state associates or judicial protection .
originally posted by: purplemer
Lets see what happens here. With this giant game of cat and mouse. Many would like to see her behind bars and it looks like there are moves in place to make this happen.
Assange showed his determination to see Clinton indicted by setting an October 21 deadline – indict her yourself or I will release irrefutable proof that she has committed high treason.
This comes just days after WikiLeaks released another letter from the Senate Intelligence Committee inviting him to testify privately before the Committee. Assange tweeted on August 8, 2018:
originally posted by: projectvxn
Put up or shut up Wikileaks.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: purplemer
This hoax has been going around since before the election. This is why you don't put any stock in "Freedomnewsreport.com" and obvious fake news blogs like it.
Here it was posted on November 11, 2016 on The Minority Report Blog where they also falsely claim:
n a letter hand-delivered to the Daily Mirror, Julian Assange writes:
“Hillary Clinton’s crimes will not go unpunished. If she is not formally charged for mishandling sensitive material we will have no choice but to release proof that she is guilty of high treason against the United States for selling patented military secrets to the Saudi Arabian government. We also have proof that she is guilty of crimes against Russia, Uzbekistan, Lithuania, Caledonia and Brazil. The United States would be doing her a favor by putting her in prison and saving her from the severe punishments several of these nations would impose.”
WikiLeaks has also given Trump a deadline… If he does not indict Clinton by January 21st, they will release the information in their possession which proves she is guilty of treason.
Because Assange would send a hand delivered letter to the Daily Mirror. Lmao. And let's get real here, how does this make any sense at all? If Clinton was guilty of treason and WikiLeaks had proof, they'd just release it not give some ultimatum about indicting her for mishandling classified information.
Now, my question to you is where did you pick this link up from? Social media? Are you going to go back and tell people that this is fake news? Are you going to stop following links from whoever pushed this nonsense on you?
LOL, and why would I take your word for that?
Clinton’s State Department was getting pressure from President Obama and his White House inner circle, as well as heads of state internationally, to try and cutoff Assange’s delivery of the cables and if that effort failed, then to forge a strategy to minimize the administration’s public embarrassment over the contents of the cables. Hence, Clinton’s early morning November meeting of State’s top brass who floated various proposals to stop, slow or spin the Wikileaks contamination. That is when a frustrated Clinton, sources said, at some point blurted out a controversial query.
“Can’t we just drone this guy?” Clinton openly inquired, offering a simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks via a planned military drone strike, according to State Department sources. The statement drew laughter from the room which quickly died off when the Secretary kept talking in a terse manner, sources said. Clinton said Assange, after all, was a relatively soft target, “walking around” freely and thumbing his nose without any fear of reprisals from the United States.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
Hillary is gone, Obama is gone...Lets and left please move on...