It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Post has been criticized since the beginning of Murdoch's ownership for sensationalism, blatant advocacy, and conservative bias.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Southern Guardian
Aren't you tired of getting lied to by your own sources?
The OP would rather trust the lie than admit the truth.
UPDATE: The New York Times on Friday walked back a story slamming UN Ambassador Nikki Haley — issuing a lengthy editors note conceding that the paper unfairly blamed her for blowing big bucks on curtains for her East Side pad when in fact they were ordered during the Obama era.
originally posted by: Arnie123
Whelp folks, I hope we all learned a lesson, that liberal media cares not for the message, rather, the image they try to make.
For those that were critical, saw that it involved the Obummer regime.
For those that knew better and bidded their time, the liberal media retracts the story and apologies.
For the OP, still clutching to a dismantled story, lying, reaching and pushing something that doesn't exist.
This is the crux of liberal media and indoctrination that exist with them. Liberal hit piece and user exposed 😁
Good job ATS, vet the info and keep the liberal media in check, they will always fail now that you've seen that pattern they employ.
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: xuenchen
They can't just cancel a delivering contract
Yes, that's what Carson claimed. Back to the OP.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Southern Guardian
The op that the nyt itself retracted?
This is from your op.
UPDATE: The New York Times on Friday walked back a story slamming UN Ambassador Nikki Haley — issuing a lengthy editors note conceding that the paper unfairly blamed her for blowing big bucks on curtains for her East Side pad when in fact they were ordered during the Obama era.
This is why no one takes you serious.
originally posted by: Grambler
How hard would it be for the OP to just say "whoops it was Obama, but this is still bad to spend that much money"?
Instead they are choosing to sacrifice all credibility to keep going with the lie.
Truly an incredible display!
originally posted by: Bluntone22
The new York times just edited the article....
Apology follows by southern guardian?
No.....