Have the left lost their collective minds?

Really. I don't get why people are still supporting this party.

Let me say again that I am not American and neither a Republican.

But the efforts Democrats are doing to ensure they do not lose power is beyond ridiculous.

If only they had put this much effort into changing things to better on the previous administration...

Now have good laugh with me here. I'll highlight some parts to make it a quick read.

Senator Dianne Feinstein, the senior Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is to vote next week on Kavanaugh, announced cryptically that she had received "information from an individual concerning the nomination."

She said the individual wanted to remain anonymous and had declined to press the issue themselves.

"I have, however, referred the matter to federal investigative authorities," Feinstein said, without giving further detail.

The New York Times, citing officials familiar with the matter, said it involved "possible sexual misconduct" between Kavanaugh and a woman when they were both in high school.

Really. Is this for real? Are these people trying to take over the lead of your country?

Please, get real. The world is watching this mess.

It's embarrassing. Even the FBI declined to run an investigation into this.

Some obviously fake news link

I really wish you guys who support the Dems would tell me what you think about this, and if you're okay with one of your party leaders falsely accusing someone of "possible sexual misconduct" just because it doesn't fit their agendas.

Another pandering thread.


Awesome. This topic is so beyond old.


Politics is the death of a once great site.

a reply to: vinifalou

Have the left lost their collective minds?


They lost it a looongggg time ago.

This Feinstein BS is BS

💥😃💥

a reply to: vinifalou

Yes , and a Election they Thought they Had in the BAG too ! ............Oops !

This happens all the time. Remember when Obama nominated a justice, and the Repub’s stopped it, saying it was too close to the end of his term?

Each side tries to stop the Pres from putting in a justice that is not who they want. Both sides do it. Both sides.

originally posted by: Jefferton
Another pandering thread.


Awesome. This topic is so beyond old.


Politics is the death of a once great site.

You seem to participate in lots of the political threads here.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: vinifalou

Have the left lost their collective minds?


They lost it a looongggg time ago.

This Feinstein BS is BS

💥😃💥

Uhuh, yep you righties are so lucid ,smart and righteous....

a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

Nothing right about a lefty...

Its true, someone was ranting on FB today about Trump. And normally I dont say anything, but his last line was, "If we dont get rid of him now hes going to turn this country into a dictatorship, FACT!"

My response was, "What legislation, executive orders, or bills has he tried to push through, that would facilitate this?" "And you also know the way our government is set up, this is virtually impossible, its the exact reason the founding fathers did it that way"

This man was in his late 50s early 60s, you would think he would know better.

The response was a prompt "eff you" and he never answered any of my questions.

They are literally losing it.

a reply to: Bluntone22

touché.

a reply to: Whatthedoctorordered

Thats because Facebook is a median of stupidity.

Did difi get this earth-shattering intel from her close Chinese spy connections/employees?

a reply to: vinifalou


Yes, Yes they have, welcome to the party

a reply to: Jefferton

Democrats, the death of a once great experiment of government

I do kind of agree with no, 9-11 was a couple of days ago and no posts on _______ really did ______, it was kind of sad

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Whatthedoctorordered

Thats because Facebook is a median of stupidity.

That pretty much goes for just about any other forum, or social network anymore.

I find theres just as much stupidity on my FB feed as there is streaming through ATS at any given moment.

originally posted by: Bluntone22

originally posted by: Jefferton
Another pandering thread.


Awesome. This topic is so beyond old.


Politics is the death of a once great site.

You seem to participate in lots of the political threads here.

I call out bull# wherever the topic takes me.

a reply to: vinifalou


You say they're trying not to "lose power"? HA! HA! People with "power" don't behave like Maxine Waters, Diane Feinstein, Camel Harris, Cory Booger, and that lady who's "the future of the Dim party".

I'm watching Tucker Carlson. He's interviewing Stormy's attorney Michael Avenatti. Tucker just called him a "creepy porn lawyer", and Avenatti liked it! This illustrates perfectly the deranged collective minds of Democrats. Obama and Hillary realize this about Democrats too, and capitalize on it. Very sad.

a reply to: vinifalou

Please, get real. The world is watching this mess.

Someone think about the kids! The kids!!!oneoneeleven

The woman who is the subject of the letter is now being represented by Debra Katz, a whistleblower attorney who works with #MeToo survivors. Joseph Abboud, an attorney at Katz’s firm, said that the firm was declining to comment. Emma Crisci, a spokesperson for Eshoo, declined to comment on the letter her office sent to Feinstein, saying that the office has a confidentiality policy when it comes to constituent casework. A spokesperson for Feinstein did not respond to requests for comment.

theintercept.com...

When Justice Scalia died suddenly in February, President Obama was gifted the opportunity to fill his third seat on the Court. He had previously replaced David Souter with Sonia Sotomayor and John Paul Stevens with Elena Kagan. Neither of those appointments shifted the Court’s ideological balance, as in each case Obama replaced, broadly speaking, a judicial liberal with another liberal. Replacing Scalia, on the other hand, was going to be a monumental shift in the Court. Scalia was one of the most conservative justices in the history of the Supreme Court. An Obama replacement would give the Court its fifth liberal and shift it to the left in historically significant ways. President Obama and Democrats were salivating at the opportunity.
The Republicans, though, were having none of it. Through unflinching and unified obstructionism combined with Tuesday’s election of Donald Trump, they succeeded in stealing the seat right out from under President Obama’s nose. It was a staggering case of grand theft judiciary.
This all started almost immediately after Scalia’s death, with the Republicans claiming a new theory that a president should not be able to appoint a justice during an election year; rather, the people should be allowed to speak and decide on the direction of the Court, they said. Never mind that justices have been confirmed regularly throughout history in election years, and that presidents have constitutional authority to appoint judges to the federal judiciary in all four years of their term, not just their first three, and that the Court would have to (and continues to) function with only eight justices. The Republicans understood the stakes of shifting the Court’s ideology, so they put up a united obstructionist front and never wavered in saying they would not confirm an Obama appointee this year.

www.rollingstone.com...

Pretty slimy, huh. How could anyone support a party who lies in order to stop a President from exercising his constitutional right?