It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
an instance of a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn from two given or assumed propositions (premises); a common or middle term is present in the two premises but not in the conclusion, which may be invalid (e.g. all dogs are animals; all animals have four legs; therefore all dogs have four legs ).
I explicitly wrote that all ANTIFA are communist.
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: Fools
I explicitly wrote that all ANTIFA are communist.
Here's the rub - Antifa isn't a homogenous organisation like the proud boys or something equally reductionistic. You're missing the point here, as usual.
Write it down again? Repetition is key, innit?
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: Fools
I explicitly wrote that all ANTIFA are communist.
Here's the rub - Antifa isn't a homogenous organisation like the proud boys or something equally reductionistic. You're missing the point here, as usual.
Write it down again? Repetition is key, innit?
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: Fools
What happened to put up or shut up?
Am I supposed to debunk your generalizing statement now? It's not my problem if you can't differentiate between people and their individual opinions on God and life in a sort of combined struggle against all sorts of fascism.
Who cares about open borders anyway, that's how you identify and lable communists? Aha. Colour me amused.
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: Topato
jerkoff club, funded by Soros,
Put up or shut up, antisemite?
I can play dumb games as well, try me!
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: Topato
jerkoff club, funded by Soros,
Put up or shut up, antisemite?
I can play dumb games as well, try me!
Appearing on Infowars with host Owen Shroyer on Monday, Rhodes explained that Oath Keepers is organizing “Spartan Training Groups” in every state with the aim of bolstering efforts to combat “antifa and the far left.” He spun the effort as part of a larger vision of becoming a national militia that could be called into action by President Trump:
“We’re going to have our most experienced law enforcement and military veterans, as well as firefighters, EMTs, Search and Rescue — guys that we’ve vetted that are qualified to teach, to go and train average Americans in how to organize their own neighborhood watch, their own security teams, their own event security, and walk them up the ladder in proficiency, so that they are available for the sheriff as a posse, under a Constitutional governor to be a state militia, or if it was called out by the President of the United States to serve as a militia of the United States to secure the schools, protect our borders, or whatever else he asks them to do to execute our laws, repel invasions, and to suppress insurrections, which we’re seeing from the left right now.”
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: Fools
Who on Ceres cares about rumors. Grow a set of balls and put up something for debate, how's that?
I'll wait.
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: Fools
I'm still waiting for the argument. Where do you get this stuff, was it a ytube clip from BIN?
originally posted by: Fools
a reply to: underwerks
Funny that you link SPLC. Once again pretty much any group that doesn't fall in line with what the SPLC says is "far right". I like how in the article it mentions the Proud Boys being violent in Portland. As if Antifa was just there minding their own business knitting mittens and then all the sudden Proud Boys came and beat them all up.
How silly and how obviously opaque of SPLC.
Have any of you ever checked out the SPLC hqd? No?
Take a gander:
www.google.com... ICigB&biw=1335&bih=915#imgrc=lXNRgsnGgYyNuM:
Looks like "defending poverty" is a pretty lucrative business.
"Anne and Carl Braden, who were CPUSA members. They had been identified in sworn testimony, and they made no attempt to deny the allegations."
groups.google.com...#!topic/radicalcentrism/hO2ST7Sf_Dg
Once again, communist. Always communist.
That makes me wonder what role you have in the communist party?