The time-line where Hillary won

There's a lot of ridiculous rhetoric coming from the MSM recently, implying Trump is unfit to be President and is incapable of making rational decisions. This mind set, in my opinion, highlights just how bad these people are at making connections between cause and effect. It's the same reason they persistently espouse anti-capitalism and anti-free-market ideals, a poor understanding of complex systems may lead one to believe the best economic system is the one which exudes the most virtue rather than the one based on individual liberty and cold hard facts.

What if the situation were reversed and Hillary had won the election, do you think the entire MSM would constantly be criticizing her and her children? Would they constantly demand her impeachment due to questionable activity before the election, or would they be constantly praising her regardless of how good a job she was doing? Would she have been able to strike some sort of peace deal with nations like North Korea? Would she be trying to start a war with Russia instead of trying to repair relationships with them? Would she be continuing the funding and aiding of rebels in Syria in order to overthrow a sovereign government like the previous administration?

Would she have the same work ethic and energy levels as Trump, would the economy be going so well, would unemployment be so low, would she do better than Trump even without the MSM against her? Would she lower taxes, would she fight to get better trade deals for the U.S. or would she just accept what ever the globalists handed to her? Would she have the backbone required to stand against the deep state in any way what so ever? Would she fight for common folks such as farmers and miners in order to bring back jobs that were said to be long gone? Would she really tell the truth or just say what people want to hear because it makes them feel good?

Despite so many obstacles Trump is still succeeding, unlike most politicians he actually has some understanding of how business works, and although his methods may be untraditional, they are clearly effective. Sadly, a large fraction of the population care more about appearances than they do about substance, they look up to people who are clearly just pure evil, but they wear a nice suit and say the right things, they always tow the line and their behavior is predictable. I mean just look at how the MSM reacted to Musk puffing on a joint... I thought liberals were supposed to be, you know, liberal. I'm not the biggest fan of Musk but the guy didn't even inhale, just chill.

If the many worlds interpretation is true I feel sorry for the people living in a time-line where Hillary won. They don't know what it's like to see so much of the shadowy power structures get exposed and come crashing down, they will never have an understanding of the true extent of "fake news" and the level of propaganda which is used to control the way people think and view the world. They will probably never see NK enter onto the path of redemption and they probably wont see the destruction of groups like ISIS any time soon. And they wont see the fruits of free market capitalism, instead they will head more rapidly down the path of socialism and higher taxes.

I think Hillary did win the election. Fortunately, a Russian wizard used the Time Stone to go back and alter the results.

It was the only way.

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

She'd already have instated her 5 MILLION strong national service (militant SJW regiment) brigades.



Hillary's 5,000,000+ Strong Civilian "National Service" (SJW) Brigades

I think we'd be in the same politically torn situation we are in now, but for different reasons: another recession, lost jobs, tighter thus crippling just about everything, etc. but you can believe they'd be cheering her on every step of the way.

The only issue that would no longer exist is the constant barrage of stupid tweets.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: ChaoticOrder

She'd already have instated her 5 MILLION strong national service (militant SJW regiment) brigades.

Hillary's 5,000,000+ Strong Civilian "National Service" (SJW) Brigades

zi democrati Sturmabteilung training school.


"I know zi voterz vuud haff zupported zis plan"

Seems like you forgot about her planned false flag atomic nightmare.

Also fox would not look he same at all.

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

What if the situation were reversed and Hillary had won the election, do you think the entire MSM would constantly be criticizing her and her children? Would they constantly demand her impeachment due to questionable activity before the election, or would they be constantly praising her regardless of how good a job she was doing? Would she have been able to strike some sort of peace deal with nations like North Korea? Would she be trying to start a war with Russia instead of trying to repair relationships with them? Would she be continuing the funding and aiding of rebels in Syria in order to overthrow a sovereign government like the previous administration?

Yep. Just substitute "right wing media" for "entire MSM" (of which you really meant "left wing media"). And how do I know this? Because we saw it under Obama.

You do not want to hear it, but the rest of the world (okay, not everyone, because not everyone has even heard about Trump I guess) would like another president, because Trump is a
childish,
narcisstic,
incapable,
terrified,
misogynistic,
golfplaying way too much,
loser of a president,

who will find a "special" place in history books. You know that kind of "special".

I do not think that Hillary Clinton would be any better, she seriously creeps me out with her robotic, frozen creep-smile.

Do better next term, thanks, the rest of the world (as above).

originally posted by: dothedew
The only issue that would no longer exist is the constant barrage of stupid tweets.

I assume you mean SJW tweets, and that would be the one good thing about that time line, there probably wouldn't have been a SJW uprising.

I think it's all bs really.

Trump was the answer to gov satisfaction at an all time low.

With parties you get either one who is openly against us, or a fake fighter for us.

The fake fighter Trump would end the Smith-mundt act change that was made that created the endless propaganda we have now.

The media has always been state controlled and reading off a wire they all get.

It's not the "liberal media"

-it is the state media

We are all still getting boned.

There are still a few tards that take the 100 dollar a month tax crumb as a win though.

Hillary even openly stated she wanted to raise taxes, she was the bad character.

It's all a soap opera to distract the idiot tax payers.

originally posted by: VictorVonDoom
I think Hillary did win the election. Fortunately, a Russian wizard used the Time Stone to go back and alter the results.

It was the only way.

In the back of my mind I've always had this weird theory that the reason Trump won despite the huge odds against him was because in the time-line where Hillary won a world war was started and most of the world population died, or at the very least I died on that time line, so the only time-line in which I can exist is the highly improbable time-line where Trump won.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Yep. Just substitute "right wing media" for "entire MSM" (of which you really meant "left wing media"). And how do I know this? Because we saw it under Obama.

Even Fox didn't have the level of vitriol we see directed towards Trump with Obama, and right wing media clearly doesn't represent the majority of MSM outlets. I don't think we have a single right wing MSM news source in Australia, pretty much every bit of news we see about Trump is negative and packed full of misleading information just like leftist MSM sources in the U.S.

a reply to: xuenchen

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

If Hillary would have won her girlfriend, Huma Abedeen, would be first lady. And her beard Bill would be molesting the young interns.

a reply to: ChaoticOrder


"right wing media"...left wing media"...

See this right here's the problem. News media shouldn't be left or right it should be objective. The people who run news corporations should not have a vested interest in any political party. The news should question everything any government does all the time. As soon as they support.one or another politician it's not really news any more. It's propaganda.

originally posted by: ManFromEurope
You do not want to hear it, but the rest of the world (okay, not everyone, because not everyone has even heard about Trump I guess) would like another president, because Trump is a
childish,
narcisstic,
incapable,
terrified,
misogynistic,
golfplaying way too much,
loser of a president,

who will find a "special" place in history books. You know that kind of "special".

I do not think that Hillary Clinton would be any better, she seriously creeps me out with her robotic, frozen creep-smile.

Do better next term, thanks, the rest of the world (as above).

I think you'll be quite disappointed when they mention Donald Trump in history books.

I live in South America and I, along with most of the population where I live think America is doing great right now, and he still have almost 2 years left.

originally posted by: ChaoticOrder

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Yep. Just substitute "right wing media" for "entire MSM" (of which you really meant "left wing media"). And how do I know this? Because we saw it under Obama.

Even Fox didn't have the level of vitriol we see directed towards Trump with Obama, and right wing media clearly doesn't represent the majority of MSM outlets. I don't think we have a single right wing MSM news source in Australia, pretty much every bit of news we see about Trump is negative and packed full of misleading information just like leftist MSM sources in the U.S.

Lol. Yes they did. Don't be silly. For example, here is Fox News and Glenn Beck bitching about Michelle Obama's sleeveless dress.

a reply to: ManFromEurope

Oh you speak for the rest of the world do you? I don't live in the U.S. And you just prove my point by listing a bunch of buzz words to describe Trump, the loser one is especially rich. It's all about trying to generalize your opponents instead of taking a deeper look at what they really stand for.

originally posted by: ChaoticOrder

They decided it was enough just to say Trump had "narcissistic tendencies" and lacked empathy. Those labels probably have some truth to them considering he liked to fire people on national television... but is that really a path you guys want to go down? Just get a few psychiatrists to remotely diagnose the president as insane and he's out? News flash, most politicians and high level businessman have those traits and many are flat out psychopaths, it's why they are so successful in those fields. What you really think Hillary is overflowing with empathy?

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

In the timeline where Hillary won, I've already been killed by her Brown-shirt thugs.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Lol. Yes they did. Don't be silly. For example, here is Fox News and Glenn Beck bitching about Michelle Obama's sleeveless dress.

Oh great you found one story, I can find a new story literally every night, multiple stories a night in fact, and since the majority of MSM outlets apparently have the same overlords it is highly misleading and damaging to society. And it's not just calm and rational reports, it's out of control and unhinged ranting which makes them look crazier than Trump.