New Texts Reveal FBI Leaked Information to the Press to Damage Trump

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Just as smug and pompous as the left in 16'. No one else is aloud to have an opinion if they don't read from your extreme script.

Typical virtue-signalling nonsense. No one is allowed to have an opinion unless they engage in the same fence-sitting.

That's not true. I engage with people on both sides of the isle civilly and respect their opinions.

And I'll call out both sides when they say anyone not in their camp is uneducated/brainwashed ect.

We're a country of 330~ million, so forgive me for not taking one of the two options.

You cannot start building a bridge from the middle of the river. If you want mass agreement, consensus and unity, there are some great countries that have single-party solutions you might want to take a look at.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: CriticalStinker


It's time to realize that neither "side" wants to benefit the country.


Perhaps they never have.



Since the writing of the Constitution all Washington has ever done is to look for each and every loophole to subvert this document.

They even go as far as to further most of each other's agenda. They differ on a few issues in reality.

Unfortunately both sides have so many loyalists a third party or independent option always looks bleak.

Although last cycle showed a lot of promise as both had grass roots type candidates that didn't represent the establishment.

I'll try and reign back the tangents, if the FBI acted as a whole, or even had a few bad actors trying to influence the election (it looks like one or both may be true), than those responsible need to be punished.

Same goes for any politician proven of crime. But we will get a lot further by bringing up these points the right way.

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Just as smug and pompous as the left in 16'. No one else is aloud to have an opinion if they don't read from your extreme script.

Typical virtue-signalling nonsense. No one is allowed to have an opinion unless they engage in the same fence-sitting.

That's not true. I engage with people on both sides of the isle civilly and respect their opinions.

And I'll call out both sides when they say anyone not in their camp is uneducated/brainwashed ect.

We're a country of 330~ million, so forgive me for not taking one of the two options.

You cannot start building a bridge from the middle of the river. If you want mass agreement, consensus and unity, there are some great countries that have single-party solutions you might want to take a look at.

Yea, we pretty much have a single party here.

I don't expect everyone to agree. I just expect people to uphold freedom of speech/expression and respect it rather than giving lip service when it fits their agenda.

You can disagree with a neighbor, but they are still part of your community and not an enemy.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Just as smug and pompous as the left in 16'. No one else is aloud to have an opinion if they don't read from your extreme script.

Typical virtue-signalling nonsense. No one is allowed to have an opinion unless they engage in the same fence-sitting.

That's not true. I engage with people on both sides of the isle civilly and respect their opinions.

And I'll call out both sides when they say anyone not in their camp is uneducated/brainwashed ect.

We're a country of 330~ million, so forgive me for not taking one of the two options.

You cannot start building a bridge from the middle of the river. If you want mass agreement, consensus and unity, there are some great countries that have single-party solutions you might want to take a look at.

Yea, we pretty much have a single party here.

I don't expect everyone to agree. I just expect people to uphold freedom of speech/expression and respect it rather than giving lip service when it fits their agenda.

You can disagree with a neighbor, but they are still part of your community and not an enemy.

Is this before or after you accused me of extremism for stating my opinion?

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Just as smug and pompous as the left in 16'. No one else is aloud to have an opinion if they don't read from your extreme script.

Typical virtue-signalling nonsense. No one is allowed to have an opinion unless they engage in the same fence-sitting.

That's not true. I engage with people on both sides of the isle civilly and respect their opinions.

And I'll call out both sides when they say anyone not in their camp is uneducated/brainwashed ect.

We're a country of 330~ million, so forgive me for not taking one of the two options.

You cannot start building a bridge from the middle of the river. If you want mass agreement, consensus and unity, there are some great countries that have single-party solutions you might want to take a look at.

Yea, we pretty much have a single party here.

I don't expect everyone to agree. I just expect people to uphold freedom of speech/expression and respect it rather than giving lip service when it fits their agenda.

You can disagree with a neighbor, but they are still part of your community and not an enemy.

Is this before or after you accused me of extremism for stating my opinion?

After.

Strzok Page texts

The few posts are going to show what seems to be Strzok and Page discussing a leak to the Wall Street Journal that they knew was coming. They are arguing because Strzok wants to send the link to everyone seconds after the article is posted, but Page wants to wait for someone else to tell them about it, so that it is not so obvious.

They say this is "all about trying to smear a public servant".

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Just as smug and pompous as the left in 16'. No one else is aloud to have an opinion if they don't read from your extreme script.

Typical virtue-signalling nonsense. No one is allowed to have an opinion unless they engage in the same fence-sitting.

That's not true. I engage with people on both sides of the isle civilly and respect their opinions.

And I'll call out both sides when they say anyone not in their camp is uneducated/brainwashed ect.

We're a country of 330~ million, so forgive me for not taking one of the two options.

You cannot start building a bridge from the middle of the river. If you want mass agreement, consensus and unity, there are some great countries that have single-party solutions you might want to take a look at.

Yea, we pretty much have a single party here.

I don't expect everyone to agree. I just expect people to uphold freedom of speech/expression and respect it rather than giving lip service when it fits their agenda.

You can disagree with a neighbor, but they are still part of your community and not an enemy.

Is this before or after you accused me of extremism for stating my opinion?

After.

Maybe its high time to uphold freedom of speech/expression and respect it rather than giving lip service when it fits their agenda.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Strzok Page texts

The few posts are going to show what seems to be Strzok and Page discussing a leak to the Wall Street Journal that they knew was coming. They are arguing because Strzok wants to send the link to everyone seconds after the article is posted, but Page wants to wait for someone else to tell them about it, so that it is not so obvious.

They say this is "all about trying to smear a public servant".

I was looking at that earlier.
I believe it was this article:

www.wsj.com...

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Just as smug and pompous as the left in 16'. No one else is aloud to have an opinion if they don't read from your extreme script.

Typical virtue-signalling nonsense. No one is allowed to have an opinion unless they engage in the same fence-sitting.

That's not true. I engage with people on both sides of the isle civilly and respect their opinions.

And I'll call out both sides when they say anyone not in their camp is uneducated/brainwashed ect.

We're a country of 330~ million, so forgive me for not taking one of the two options.

You cannot start building a bridge from the middle of the river. If you want mass agreement, consensus and unity, there are some great countries that have single-party solutions you might want to take a look at.

Yea, we pretty much have a single party here.

I don't expect everyone to agree. I just expect people to uphold freedom of speech/expression and respect it rather than giving lip service when it fits their agenda.

You can disagree with a neighbor, but they are still part of your community and not an enemy.

Is this before or after you accused me of extremism for stating my opinion?

After.

Maybe its high time to uphold freedom of speech/expression and respect it rather than giving lip service when it fits their agenda.

Touche, you got me on that one.

But I'm sure you could admit when you say that if people are being critical of Trump on some issues, they are duped by propaganda, it can come off as smug... Just as when I said that it sounded smug and similar to the left in 16' if you didn't read from their script.

a reply to: Lumenari

"Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."

a reply to: lucidclouds

This is more like sedition than treason.

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

And possibly insurrection.
18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Just as smug and pompous as the left in 16'. No one else is aloud to have an opinion if they don't read from your extreme script.

Typical virtue-signalling nonsense. No one is allowed to have an opinion unless they engage in the same fence-sitting.

That's not true. I engage with people on both sides of the isle civilly and respect their opinions.

And I'll call out both sides when they say anyone not in their camp is uneducated/brainwashed ect.

We're a country of 330~ million, so forgive me for not taking one of the two options.

You cannot start building a bridge from the middle of the river. If you want mass agreement, consensus and unity, there are some great countries that have single-party solutions you might want to take a look at.

Yea, we pretty much have a single party here.

I don't expect everyone to agree. I just expect people to uphold freedom of speech/expression and respect it rather than giving lip service when it fits their agenda.

You can disagree with a neighbor, but they are still part of your community and not an enemy.

Is this before or after you accused me of extremism for stating my opinion?

After.

Maybe its high time to uphold freedom of speech/expression and respect it rather than giving lip service when it fits their agenda.

Touche, you got me on that one.

But I'm sure you could admit when you say that if people are being critical of Trump on some issues, they are duped by propaganda, it can come off as smug... Just as when I said that it sounded smug and similar to the left in 16' if you didn't read from their script.

Except I didn’t mention the left or right or reasonable criticism of Trump.

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Just as smug and pompous as the left in 16'. No one else is aloud to have an opinion if they don't read from your extreme script.

Typical virtue-signalling nonsense. No one is allowed to have an opinion unless they engage in the same fence-sitting.

That's not true. I engage with people on both sides of the isle civilly and respect their opinions.

And I'll call out both sides when they say anyone not in their camp is uneducated/brainwashed ect.

We're a country of 330~ million, so forgive me for not taking one of the two options.

You cannot start building a bridge from the middle of the river. If you want mass agreement, consensus and unity, there are some great countries that have single-party solutions you might want to take a look at.

Yea, we pretty much have a single party here.

I don't expect everyone to agree. I just expect people to uphold freedom of speech/expression and respect it rather than giving lip service when it fits their agenda.

You can disagree with a neighbor, but they are still part of your community and not an enemy.

Is this before or after you accused me of extremism for stating my opinion?

After.

Maybe its high time to uphold freedom of speech/expression and respect it rather than giving lip service when it fits their agenda.

Touche, you got me on that one.

But I'm sure you could admit when you say that if people are being critical of Trump on some issues, they are duped by propaganda, it can come off as smug... Just as when I said that it sounded smug and similar to the left in 16' if you didn't read from their script.

Except I didn’t mention the left or right or reasonable criticism of Trump.

You're right. I'll concede this one.

a reply to: BlueAjah


I had a feeling that Google was "in the tank" with deep-state Democrats. Those text message confirm it. Thanks!

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: BlueAjah


I had a feeling that Google was "in the tank" with deep-state Democrats. Those text message confirm it. Thanks!

No wonder Google was a no-show at that Congressional hearing last week.

Busted.

💥💥⚖💥💥

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: BlueAjah


I had a feeling that Google was "in the tank" with deep-state Democrats. Those text message confirm it. Thanks!

No wonder Google was a no-show at that Congressional hearing last week.

Busted.

💥💥⚖💥💥

Time to subpoena Google execs. They are not "too big" for that.

It really does look like an attempted coup attempt. I really hope its just hype because its very scary that people felt they had that much power. If its true we were very close to becoming controlled by a dictator. Because that was the Hitler playbook. He controlled the politicians who gave him the power to take over.

It really does look like an attempted coup attempt. I really hope its just hype because its very scary that people felt they had that much power. If its true we were very close to becoming controlled by a dictator. Because that was the Hitler playbook. He controlled the politicians who gave him the power to take over.

a reply to: dragonridr


The deep-state wanted Trump gone, and Pence to take his place, knowing that Pence had no appetite/energy for cleaning the government of corruption and evil deeds.