New Texts Reveal FBI Leaked Information to the Press to Damage Trump

a reply to: Lumenari

Until then, it will either come to that or civil war at this point if the rhetoric isn't ratcheted down by the Democratic party and their PR firm, the mainstream media.

I'm not advocating anything... just telling you what the logical conclusion is if this keeps up.

I swore that oath once... have you?

Might kill people because of political rhetoric that always has and always will exist.


Go to the VA man, talk to someone.

a reply to: JasonBillung

LOL! You were most definitely a pog

a reply to: JasonBillung

Thats fine, thats your opinion.

If trump committed a crime, let him be punished for it.

Meanwhile, everyday we get more and more evidence of the intel agencies acting improperly, and it seems like many people dont care, because they feel this corruption is fine as long as its directed against trump.

And I have argued that a corrupt intel community that is acting to stop one candidate from winning is a far greater threat than anything trump is accused of.

So when we get stories like in this OP that show the FBI and doj may have had a strategy to leak to the press to hurt trump, and people respoin by saying Mueller is going to have something on trump, it makes it seem as if the people saying that are deflecting from this abuse or cheering it on

They're Here

a reply to: PurpleFox

Sure I was. Stand down leg.

in zi IG reportz

IG report finds FBI agents have cozy relationships with reporters

a reply to: xuenchen

Of course the evil leftists colluded with the media to circumvent/over throw a duly elected president. Electing Trump put a damper on their communist/globalist goals.


We live in a Banana Republic now where ideology trumps rule of law and partisan politics has replaced justice.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: manuelram16

Didn't Lindsey Graham ask Supreme Court Justice nominee Kavanaugh about traitors and Military tribunals last week?

Graham has always irked me as a South Carolinian but I honestly thought, as I watched last week, that he was trying to get under someone's skin with his unusual line of questioning.
One of the few times I have a had positive thoughts about him.
Quad

a reply to: Grambler

So when we get stories like in this OP that show the FBI and doj may have had a strategy to leak to the press to hurt trump, and people respoin by saying Mueller is going to have something on trump, it makes it seem as if the people saying that are deflecting from this abuse or cheering it on

Yes. Agreed.

Back on the OP:

I find this tweet to be very telling as it outlines the timeline of this.

Timeline is crucial here:

April 10, 2017: Strzok sends text to Lisa Page regarding "media leak strategy."

April 11, 2017: WaPo publishes the bombshell Carter Page FISA story.

April 12, 2017: Strzok texts Lisa Page about Carter Page stories. dailycaller.com... … @dailycaller

twitter.com... www.zerohedge.com%2Fnews%2F2018-09-10%2Fnew-strzok-page-texts-discuss-fbi-media-leak-strategy-within-hours-washington-post

So they are talking about the leak strategy, then the next day Wapo publishes the carter page story, then the next day they are discussing that story.

Now keep in mind, this isnt happening in a vacuum.

We know that Page admits in her texts at one point to being on the phone with Delvin Barrett who was at the New York times at the time.

We know that someone high up in the intel community leaked details of the dossier to cnn. And we know that sonmeone leaked details of Comey briefing trump on the dossier to CNN that allowed them to run it.

And we already know McCabe is being investigated to improperly leaking to reporters.

All of this shows a pattern of people high up in the intel community leaking to the press to hurt trump.

This should outrage every American.

a reply to: Grambler


It won't though.

Truth be told, as simple as it really is, the media and elements in the government have made it so convoluted that people will turn off, turn away from this.

We're in an ideological civil war. Right now.

And the truth is always the first casualty.

a reply to: DBCowboy

We're in an ideological civil war. Right now.

Agreed.

Let's keep it civil.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Grambler


It won't though.

Truth be told, as simple as it really is, the media and elements in the government have made it so convoluted that people will turn off, turn away from this.

We're in an ideological civil war. Right now.

And the truth is always the first casualty.

Unfortunately you're right.

I'll be the first to say that during last cycle the left ramped up rhetoric against anyone who was even humoring voting for Trump.

But now I see the right reacting to calls for impeachment and the op-ed with violence.

Every single president we've had recently has had opponents call for impeachment since day one. Anyone is welcome to search ATS for impeach Obama and see the immense amounts of threads.

It won't happen though, but I don't enjoy seeing the calls for violence.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Calls for violence?

Like some leftist saying, "Where's John Wilkes Booth when we need him?" type of violence?

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Yes I agree with calls for violence.

This is not only imoral, but also strageically only serves to help the other side; regardless of which side is doing it.

I am so upset with the current system that I am trying to educate myself better, inform other people, all while being civil and understanding that this corruption hurts peoplke that are on the opposite political side as me as well.

And I may some day run for office, and try to change things that way.

But I will not resort to violence, and oppose that.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Grambler

Must be real.....

Letter from Congressman to RR ...

The "Letter"

((😎))

Why was this letter saraacarter.com... sent to ROD ROSENSTEIN? He's part of the Spygate criminal cabal! Why not his boss, Jeff Sessions?

a reply to: Quadrivium


Senator Lindsay Graham revealed today, on the Sean Hannity radio program, that the Sessions/Huber/Grand Jury investigation into DOJ/FBI corruption is merely a "pacifier", like what you give a baby to keep him/her quiet.

a reply to: Grambler

This is not only imoral, but also strageically only serves to help the other side; regardless of which side is doing it.

Exactly, that's what people don't think about. And I know 99% of them are being hyperbolic, but I they're doing precisely what the left did last cycle... Going past disagreeing and dismissing along with using strong rhetoric.

Back to your OP, this is sad because it takes away from the content of the conversation, like abuses of power.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Calls for violence?

Like some leftist saying, "Where's John Wilkes Booth when we need him?" type of violence?

I'm not going to act like it's only one side.

But certainly you've seen one side call for more of it the past week and take it to a national level.

I voted for Trump, and to be honest between the rhetoric and all the Q die hards, I'm admitting that less and less recently and getting to the point I regret even self associating because we voted for the same guy.

a reply to: xuenchen

We all already knew this.