It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: abe froman
Mifsud told Papadopoulos that the Russians possessed incriminating information about Hillary Clinton in the form of "thousands of emails" — before it was widely and publicly known that Russia had stolen Democratic emails, according to Papadopoulos and prosecutors.
The funny thing to me is, at the bottom of all these investigations is the same piece of filth criminal.
Every single investigation points right back to Hillary Clinton.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: watchitburn
Absolutely not. He'd have to prove what he claims.
originally posted by: norhoc
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
Hitler's propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels, supposedly said: "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it
Harry Reid Says He ‘Did What Was Necessary’ By Lying About Mitt Romney’s Tax Returns He went on to say "call it what you want, but, he didn't win did he?"
You libs have proven nothing, you are following the goebells school of thought, which is to repeat a lie often enough and people will believe it is the truth. I love the way you address nothing of substance and just make sh1t up and name call.
What's to make up? Just need to watch the convictions falling into place as the investigations go once-round-and-up.
originally posted by: norhoc
I love the way you address nothing of substance and just make sh1t up and name call.
this breaking headline could be the smoking gun the finally proves beyond a doubt that there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian
originally posted by: norhoc
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
You mean the convictions that have NOTHING to do with Russia or Collusion? The conviction of Manafort for tax evasion a decade ago? Those convictions? . This is my last reply to you, it is not even worth it. you libs live in an imaginary world of fiction. Arguing with a liberal is like arguing with a 5 year old.
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: CB328
So now that the guys has been convicted of lying to the FBI, he's suddenly credible?
Which is it?
originally posted by: norhoc
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
What are you talking about? Any lawyer would tell you, even if innocent to not talk to the police unless you have to. And I don't see anyone "freaking out" as you claim. And when did I say it is not a big deal to lie to the FBI? It must not be that big of a deal though, Hillary did it and had nothing done to her. Stop moving the goal posts and putting words in peoples mouths
originally posted by: abe froman
Mifsud told Papadopoulos that the Russians possessed incriminating information about Hillary Clinton in the form of "thousands of emails" — before it was widely and publicly known that Russia had stolen Democratic emails, according to Papadopoulos and prosecutors.
The funny thing to me is, at the bottom of all these investigations is the same piece of filth criminal.
Every single investigation points right back to Hillary Clinton.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Kharron
Maybe somebody can explain why he was going to England to meet a professor about getting to work on a project unrelated to the 2016 election.
Right before the election on top of it.
💥😃💥