It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: makemap
Lol, I didn't say Canada cares about Brits, why would you feel the need to assert that you don't?
My whole point was the better quality of life people in Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand have compared to the average US peasant.
If you wanna go down the road of criticising nations then back at ya, I piss my pants laughing that you have a foreign monarch as head of state, and represented by a governor general. Owned by the UK Crown, dress it up as much as you like being a separate legal 'Canadian Crown' but de facto UK Crown as leader of your nation PMSL.
If you had just stuck to my posted words eh? I'll enter a pissing match about the Crown and which nations are the funniest peasants anyday.
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
All I really know for sure is that I have no idea what I actually have. And as long as I don't know anything else, I cannot say that I have any meaningful choice in the matter.
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
I'll have to go with corporate fascism.
They keep the fascist edge subtle but it's sharp when needed.
They try to keep up the illusion were a representative republic but most see through it.
Unfortunately most ignore it as well thinking there isn't a damn thing they can do about it.
originally posted by: XAnarchistX
Authoritarian Capitalism, increasing in hyper-civilised techno-fascism
Not sure I entirely agree but whatever the economics are, it is definitely authoritarian.
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Not sure I entirely agree but whatever the economics are, it is definitely authoritarian.
How so?
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Not sure I entirely agree but whatever the economics are, it is definitely authoritarian.
How so?
Like this.
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Not sure I entirely agree but whatever the economics are, it is definitely authoritarian.
How so?
Like this.
Like what? How is the economics authoritarian?
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Not sure I entirely agree but whatever the economics are, it is definitely authoritarian.
How so?
Like this.
Like what? How is the economics authoritarian?
1. Like this.
2. I said nothing about authoritarian economics. You wead it wong.
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Not sure I entirely agree but whatever the economics are, it is definitely authoritarian.
How so?
Like this.
Like what? How is the economics authoritarian?
1. Like this.
2. I said nothing about authoritarian economics. You wead it wong.
"Not sure I entirely agree but whatever the economics are, it is definitely authoritarian. "
Was this not your statement?
If I "wead" it wrong, I apologize. So what, if not the economics, is "definitely authoritarian"?
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Not sure I entirely agree but whatever the economics are, it is definitely authoritarian.
How so?
Like this.
Like what? How is the economics authoritarian?
1. Like this.
2. I said nothing about authoritarian economics. You wead it wong.
"Not sure I entirely agree but whatever the economics are, it is definitely authoritarian. "
Was this not your statement?
If I "wead" it wrong, I apologize. So what, if not the economics, is "definitely authoritarian"?
Could you just keep reading it until you comprehend it and stop arguing with what I didn't say?
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Not sure I entirely agree but whatever the economics are, it is definitely authoritarian.
How so?
Like this.
Like what? How is the economics authoritarian?
1. Like this.
2. I said nothing about authoritarian economics. You wead it wong.
"Not sure I entirely agree but whatever the economics are, it is definitely authoritarian. "
Was this not your statement?
If I "wead" it wrong, I apologize. So what, if not the economics, is "definitely authoritarian"?
Could you just keep reading it until you comprehend it and stop arguing with what I didn't say?
If it isn't "definitely authoritarian", or you didn't say that, why did you write it? I just want to know how you came to that conclusion. If you cannot comprehend your own statements, forget I asked.
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Not sure I entirely agree but whatever the economics are, it is definitely authoritarian.
How so?
Like this.
Like what? How is the economics authoritarian?
1. Like this.
2. I said nothing about authoritarian economics. You wead it wong.
"Not sure I entirely agree but whatever the economics are, it is definitely authoritarian. "
Was this not your statement?
If I "wead" it wrong, I apologize. So what, if not the economics, is "definitely authoritarian"?
Could you just keep reading it until you comprehend it and stop arguing with what I didn't say?
If it isn't "definitely authoritarian", or you didn't say that, why did you write it? I just want to know how you came to that conclusion. If you cannot comprehend your own statements, forget I asked.
See above. I modified my post. The government is authoritarian. That's what I meant. I didn't think I needed to spell it out.
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
How is the government authoritarian?
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
Forget it then. I don't think you know what you are talking about.