It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Krakatoa
You are aware that Donald Trump was famous prior to running for president, right? It is plausible that they, like many others, wanted to attend the event in order to be present at an historic event of a famous businessman and TV star being elected to the highest office in our country.
What is so special about another old white guy becoming president? The only thing historic about this presidency is how blatantly corrupt it is and how it will eventually go down with impeachment.
...
That "old white guy" is a famous billionaire Real Estate tycoon, with buildings in NY and elsewhere named after him.
That "old white guy" is a famous television reality star (whether you like it or not, that is a fact).
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Krakatoa
That "old white guy" is a famous billionaire Real Estate tycoon, with buildings in NY and elsewhere named after him.
That old white guy has declared bankruptcy three times. That old white guy was such a credit risk no American bank would loan to him so he had to take Russian money laundered through Deutsche Bank.
That "old white guy" is a famous television reality star (whether you like it or not, that is a fact).
Did "The Apprentice" air in Russia? Anyway, that old white guy is trying to run the country like a reality TV show. Full of cliffhangers and unexpected twists and turns. Of course, it is obvious how it will end.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Wardaddy454
No he didn't. Ill let you go figure that out.
Hint. Not in this indictment...
And this is certainly an American and so is the straw purchaser who is Un named in the indictment but certainly mentioned in charging documents.
Research how the FBI investigates organized crime. From the little fish to the medium-sized fish to the big fish.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: Krakatoa
WTF don't you sycophants get over the damn election already?
This isn't about the effin election anymore, its about how a moron is destroying our republic. Hillary is/was/will continue to be an idiot, but she aint making the lame attempt to run things.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Arnie123
Please answer the question. Trump is surrounded by folks who illegally handle Russian money. He received loans from Deutsche Bank under suspicious circumstances. His son met secretly with Russian agents and lied about it. Are you okay with all that? If so, why?
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: Krakatoa
WTF don't you sycophants get over the damn election already?
This isn't about the effin election anymore, its about how a moron is destroying our republic. Hillary is/was/will continue to be an idiot, but she aint making the lame attempt to run things.
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: Krakatoa
WTF don't you sycophants get over the damn election already?
This isn't about the effin election anymore, its about how a moron is destroying our republic. Hillary is/was/will continue to be an idiot, but she aint making the lame attempt to run things.
And here is the problem people can't accept the fact Trump won. Instead of just saying ok we will try harder next time ots turned into we must do what ever we can to resist Trump.
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: CB328
I did not see this posted here for some unimaginable reason, another person indicted by Mueller in the Russia probe for collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. He also failed to register a a foreign agent for Ukraine, sound familiar? It makes you wonder what the big connection is that so many people around Trump were involved in shady dealings in Ukraine. How did the Ukrainian government have so much money to pay all these people? Could they be a money laundering conduit between Russia and the West? Doesn't this invalidate Trump sayige there was no collusion with his campaign?
www.cnn.com...
Patterns of behavior - prove 'intent'.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: CB328
I did not see this posted here for some unimaginable reason, another person indicted by Mueller in the Russia probe for collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. He also failed to register a a foreign agent for Ukraine, sound familiar? It makes you wonder what the big connection is that so many people around Trump were involved in shady dealings in Ukraine. How did the Ukrainian government have so much money to pay all these people? Could they be a money laundering conduit between Russia and the West? Doesn't this invalidate Trump sayige there was no collusion with his campaign?
www.cnn.com...
Patterns of behavior - prove 'intent'.
If thats true then hills proved intent by not using a secure server. DOnations to a inaugriation do not have a cap. once again we have a person pleading guilty to a non crime.