It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
a reply to: BigDave-AR
Sure, and everyone is different.
The ones I have known took far longer to be alert and cognizant....and often they fell asleep....those seizures can take a lot out of you, it appears.
originally posted by: BigDave-AR
I will say having suffered a gran mal seizure I’m amazed at how quickly I came to
originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: DieGloke
serously? what do you know about my country? socialist school teacher?
originally posted by: howtonhawky
I will never understand how someone can shoot before recognizing the type of weapon being pointed at them.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: howtonhawky
I will never understand how someone can shoot before recognizing the type of weapon being pointed at them.
and you obviously have never had to make that choice. Lucky you. When you do have to decide things that could end your life in a fraction of second, be sure to let us know how well you dealt with it.
originally posted by: BigDave-AR
originally posted by: howtonhawky
a reply to: Blaine91555
Nope i am stating facts.
It was a failed threat assessment and does not prove intent or guilt but does show negligence.
When the page loaded and i seen you had posted pics it took all of .2 seconds to recognize the barrel size on the first pic.
The other two pics not so much cause they look alike from the side.
If a cop kills a suspect holding a non lethal weapon then it is a failed threat assessment. fact
Since when does stating a fact equate not siding with police?
You took a mental leap to couple my responses with siding with anyone.
I think you may be predispositioned to protect police at every turn.
Do you expect the cops to let her pull the trigger and gamble with their lives? I do not you can’t try to judge whether a weapon is leather or not in the heat of the moment if someone wants to be killed by the cops they may or may not use a fake or replica firearm or it may be real and they let off shots to give the officers no choice. You play stupid games you win stupid prizes this is why you don’t wave around replica guns around cops.
It shows a couple things as i pointed out one being that she presented to be a risk to herself or others and they failed to control the scene for the arrival of a likely unarmed health professional.
originally posted by: scojak
a reply to: howtonhawky
You jumped from "when they take a mental person in" to "a mental professional is being called in". Those are completely different situation.
By calling in a mental health clinician, that actually shows they did not believe she presented a danger to anyone at the time. Otherwise they would have taken her in.
originally posted by: roadgravel
Federal code
(f) Effective date
This section shall become effective on the date 6 months after November 5, 1988, and shall apply to toy, look-alike, and imitation firearms manufactured or entered into commerce after November 5, 1988.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: roadgravel
Federal code
(f) Effective date
This section shall become effective on the date 6 months after November 5, 1988, and shall apply to toy, look-alike, and imitation firearms manufactured or entered into commerce after November 5, 1988.
This is very interesting since many on here use the term replicas to describe their bb guns and the law clearly states look alike guns. I bet that cost millions in lobbying to find a loophole around that one.
It takes a person not using sound logic and reason to buy a bb gun pistol that is a look alike to a powerful fire arm. Seems like the police and supporters would not want or advocate for fakes out there.
Such term does not include any look-alike, nonfiring, collector replica of an antique firearm developed prior to 1898, or traditional B–B, paint-ball, or pellet-firing air guns that expel a projectile through the force of air pressure.
originally posted by: BigDave-AR
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: roadgravel
Federal code
(f) Effective date
This section shall become effective on the date 6 months after November 5, 1988, and shall apply to toy, look-alike, and imitation firearms manufactured or entered into commerce after November 5, 1988.
This is very interesting since many on here use the term replicas to describe their bb guns and the law clearly states look alike guns. I bet that cost millions in lobbying to find a loophole around that one.
It takes a person not using sound logic and reason to buy a bb gun pistol that is a look alike to a powerful fire arm. Seems like the police and supporters would not want or advocate for fakes out there.
Read a bit better-
Such term does not include any look-alike, nonfiring, collector replica of an antique firearm developed prior to 1898, or traditional B–B, paint-ball, or pellet-firing air guns that expel a projectile through the force of air pressure.
There are plenty of legitimate reasons for wanting a pellet/BB gun with almost no difference between it and the real deal.
As far as not clearing the room yes that was an oversight but officer safety still takes precedent there’s always the chance that you missed something so you have to be prepared for any situation.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: howtonhawky
I will never understand how someone can shoot before recognizing the type of weapon being pointed at them.
and you obviously have never had to make that choice. Lucky you. When you do have to decide things that could end your life in a fraction of second, be sure to let us know how well you dealt with it.
That is funny stuff...
You want me too let you know when i decide that the best way to deal with a threat is too shoot it.
How about no and you are a bit confused.
LOL again cause there was no threat to the officers at any point except there failure to properly secure a scene before calling in unarmed professionals. Some call doing such police procedure.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
It shows a couple things as i pointed out one being that she presented to be a risk to herself or others and they failed to control the scene for the arrival of a likely unarmed health professional.
originally posted by: scojak
a reply to: howtonhawky
You jumped from "when they take a mental person in" to "a mental professional is being called in". Those are completely different situation.
By calling in a mental health clinician, that actually shows they did not believe she presented a danger to anyone at the time. Otherwise they would have taken her in.
originally posted by: JIMC5499
I have a pistol with threads in the end of the barrel. How hard do you think that it would be for me to put an orange tip on it?
originally posted by: JIMC5499
a reply to: BigDave-AR
I was thinking along the lines of taking one from a plastic gun and threading it to fit. It would look more realistic.
I know of at least 3 times that someone has put a orange tip on a real weapon. If you point an orange tip at me in certain situations you are going to get shot.