It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I don't think it is, or should be, protocol for an officer to clear an area of threats in a seemingly non-threatening situation.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: JIMC5499
a reply to: howtonhawky
I have a Beretta 92F 9mm. pistol. I also have a Daisy replica 92F that shoots little plastic balls. If I place them side by side with the Daisy markings down you can't tell them apart even if you pick them up.
We are not talking about replicas as far as i know.
It just says bb gun.
I accept your point but counter with the fact that replicas are rare compared to bb guns. The point you made is in the minority. imho
Threat assessment is a duty of an officer and every failed threat assessment does not equate intent or guilt only negligence.
If a person with a non lethal weapon is killed by police then they have failed in their threat assessment.
Things like reaction time and other circumstances do come into play. I understand all that.
originally posted by: JIMC5499
a reply to: howtonhawky
I have a Beretta 92F 9mm. pistol. I also have a Daisy replica 92F that shoots little plastic balls. If I place them side by side with the Daisy markings down you can't tell them apart even if you pick them up.
originally posted by: Guiltyguitarist
a reply to: howtonhawky
When did they stop putting orange tips on the barrels of B.B. guns?
originally posted by: StallionDuck
originally posted by: Guiltyguitarist
a reply to: howtonhawky
When did they stop putting orange tips on the barrels of B.B. guns?
When did they start?
originally posted by: howtonhawky
a reply to: Blaine91555
Nope i am stating facts.
It was a failed threat assessment and does not prove intent or guilt but does show negligence.
When the page loaded and i seen you had posted pics it took all of .2 seconds to recognize the barrel size on the first pic.
The other two pics not so much cause they look alike from the side.
If a cop kills a suspect holding a non lethal weapon then it is a failed threat assessment. fact
Since when does stating a fact equate not siding with police?
You took a mental leap to couple my responses with siding with anyone.
I think you may be predispositioned to protect police at every turn.
originally posted by: StallionDuck
I bet when she had that seizure, she realized it was coming quickly. This poor woman had been jaded so bad in the industry and not one of any authority gave two craps about her being groped and blacklisted because she spoke up. When she came out of that seizure, she knew she had a way out and she took it.
originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
originally posted by: StallionDuck
I bet when she had that seizure, she realized it was coming quickly. This poor woman had been jaded so bad in the industry and not one of any authority gave two craps about her being groped and blacklisted because she spoke up. When she came out of that seizure, she knew she had a way out and she took it.
IF it was a gran mal seizure, she probably didn't know her name or where she even WAS.
Leta alone what an "intruder" was doing in her home.
Police should be trained to know about seizures.
That ignorance led to her wrongful death.
IMHO.