TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -e11even-

a reply to: Elostone

I bet Corsi loves it. Makes him feel legitimate.

originally posted by: MountainLaurel

That was a pretty ominous question Graham asked ! What I heard, and I'll need to go back and watch it, is him saying / asking " is there a difference between freedom of speech and subversion against the Country ? " Holy Moly , explains a lot huh ! HRC.s frenzied tweets to protest BK and the rest of this circus going on surrounding BK's nomination.

Notable that the question itself suggests the appropriate answer. Not just in the format of the question, but in the fact it merely exists.

Has the issue of Hillary having an existing "sealed" pardon from Obama been discussed?

It would answer questions like, "why is Hillary walking free?" and also how new legal cases against her need to be developed. I would say the CF is toast.

It makes you wonder how many pardons could Obama have signed, including his own. Could it be 1000, or even 50,000?

Worth checking, if Presidential pardons apply to certain high crimes involving UCMJ and other venues, like military tribunals. I kind of remember that they do not absolve a person. That highlights the option of asylum overseas.

Good excuse to post my Dante's Inferno meem:

originally posted by: FlyingFox
Has the issue of Hillary having an existing "sealed" pardon from Obama been discussed?

It would answer questions like, "why is Hillary walking free?" and also how new legal cases against her need to be developed. I would say the CF is toast.

It makes you wonder how many pardons could Obama have signed, including his own. Could it be 1000, or even 50,000?

Worth checking, if Presidential pardons apply to certain high crimes involving UCMJ and other venues, like military tribunals. I kind of remember that they do not absolve a person. That highlights the option of asylum overseas.

Good excuse to post my Dante's Inferno meem:

FF, the pardons are an odd thing. Who's going to accept that HRC and Huma are not going to jail for trying to do x to trump or us, just because obama says so in a super secret pardon sheet hidden somewhere. There is the issue of obama's legitimacy as well, if he was not qualified to be president then the pardons are toilet paper.

Lastly the tribunal question, or statement of fact, at today's BK hearing says to me nothing doing on anyone anywhere being let off, that question was for Q folks, as there was no reason to bother with it for this hearing.

I have contended much of this will go down like No name and frankly it should. Let folks see the truth after the change if they wish.

Trump rally in billings, MT tomorrow.
u going JW?

Video of the Discord Chat thread

twitter.com...

twitter.com...

originally posted by: Elostone
a reply to: TomLawless

Here's a little spice for your soup:
www.nytimes.com... rome-corsi-subpoena-mueller-investigation.html

Yep. Mueller has come to the proverbial bottom of the barrel when he stoops so far as to subpoena Jerome Corsi!
I swear, the best fantasy writers couldn't imagine this stuff up!

Yeah, banking on Jerome Corsi to be his smoking gun link really reeks of desperation.

Ohhh this is gonna be FUN to watch.

Obama to come off bench for Democrats in battle for Congress

ETA: Obama is their last card and they just entered full desperation mode

a reply to: dashen


I would need more SS than Trump to show my face in that town.


But that's RATS


I'll be close by watching.




If you knew the state of play you'd punch me in the nose anyway...

a reply to: XAnarchistX

You need to learn the phrase "burden of proof." Say Q posts a picture, and you immediately call it out as fake, as you are wont to do. The burden of proof is on YOU, as you are the party questioning the pictures authenticity. Thats why the prosecution goes first in a trial. If YOU think something isnt true, or YOU think a picture is fake, its on YOU to provide evidence that it is fake, not on Q to provide evidence that it is real. The picture itself is evidence that its real.

originally posted by: FlyingFox
fwiw, I just spammed the crap out of Hillary's Twitter, with all of my best meems.

Simple ones, because unlike Hillary, I know my target audience.

I'm going to buy a creamy colored T-Shirt just to Shop
THAT graphic on it.. because it won't wash out my green eyes.

And I AM going to hold my breath for the Great Redacting.

a reply to: JankWarrior


id punch you anyway

a reply to: dashen


I would have it coming


Seriously so many people would love that...

nvm

a reply to: JankWarrior

you sold us out to mueller?

a reply to: crankyoldman


1. No you wouldn't


B. It wouldn't help anyway

nvm

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

What's this ask him tomorrow crap? Why don't they ask him today like right now? They've already sent a letter three months ago requesting the de clasificacion.

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: JankWarrior

you sold us out to mueller?

I would never

a reply to: carewemust


You going to the rally tomorrow?


That would be a site.