It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: toms54
Anyway, the caption says "Reuters." Since the wire service is credited, I assume they got both the story and picture from them.
That means the photo is from Reuters. The article is not a Reuters article.
originally posted by: toms54
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: toms54
a reply to: Byrd
I wouldn't say RT is as good a source as a respected scientific journal. For general news it's as good a source as CNN. It really depends on the topic for any source.
So you don't care that they showed the bottom of a column in their "cheese" pic?
Harte
I would have preferred to see an actual photo of the subject of the article. That said, it's not like I haven't seen this before in any number of popular articles. They don't have a suitable picture so they put up something they feel is representative. Or maybe some art.
The thing about this was the caption, "The 3,200-year-old cheese © University of Catania - University of Cairo / Reuters" To tell the truth, I don't know a column from cheese. I believed it. The only reason I believe you now is because I have seen you post about archeology so I believe you probably know the difference.
originally posted by: toms54
a reply to: Harte
I took a quick look for other sources. There is an abstract with no pictures at pubs.acs.org... Others news sources seem to have the exact same picture. Here's the one from The Boston Globe:
Now that’s some aged cheese: Researchers say world’s oldest known solid cheese found in an Egyptian tomb
That caption says, "University of Catania and Cairo University via The New York Times" so the photo must be in The New York Times also. Starting to look like it's legit.
originally posted by: toms54
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: toms54
Anyway, the caption says "Reuters." Since the wire service is credited, I assume they got both the story and picture from them.
That means the photo is from Reuters. The article is not a Reuters article.
Considering that the Google News link I posted contains about 40 sources, many with the same picture, most of them newspapers, all at the same time, I would say odds are good it came from some wire service.
The original article titled, ‘ World’s Oldest Cheese Found in Egyptian Tomb ,’ was first published on Science Daily .
Source: American Chemical Society. "World's oldest cheese found in Egyptian tomb." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 15 August 2018. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180815105307.htm
Story Source: Materials provided by American Chemical Society. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.
the specimen contained signs of a bacterium known to cause brucellosis, a deadly disease spread from animals to people via unpasteurised dairy.
originally posted by: toms54
a reply to: Harte
Ancient Origins gives their source as follows:
The original article titled, ‘ World’s Oldest Cheese Found in Egyptian Tomb ,’ was first published on Science Daily .
Source: American Chemical Society. "World's oldest cheese found in Egyptian tomb." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 15 August 2018. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180815105307.htm
Science Daily gives their source as follows:
Story Source: Materials provided by American Chemical Society. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.
They both then quote the journal refence:
Enrico Greco, Ola El-Aguizy, Mona Fouad Ali, Salvatore Foti, Vincenzo Cunsolo, Rosaria Saletti, Enrico Ciliberto. Proteomic Analyses on an Ancient Egyptian Cheese and Biomolecular Evidence of Brucellosis. Analytical Chemistry, 2018; DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02535
Neither the Ancient Origins or the Science Daily article contained that photo.
originally posted by: DexterRiley
the specimen contained signs of a bacterium known to cause brucellosis, a deadly disease spread from animals to people via unpasteurised dairy.
Is it possible that ancient people were less susceptible to being infected with these bacteria?
Since they didn't know about Pasteurization and the germ theory of disease, it seems to me that this is something they would encounter frequently.
-dex
Remember that the AVERAGE life expectancy back then was around 35-40 years