Trump tonight no Ranting Here.

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

Can the same be said for those who hate(d) Obama?

I'll answer your question this way. Yes, there are those that hated obama, but their level of hate never reached the levels that we are seeing here today. I would hope that you would agree that the blind, foaming at the mouth hatred directed at President Trump is alarming.

If you are convinced that a blind monkey can write proper English, you will put him behind a typewriter and wait. Eventually the monkey will hit just the right keys in the right order to form a few simple words sparsed between a lot of garbage. You can then point to these words and rightfully say: "you can talk all you want, but this is an intelligent creature that writes meaningful things, look here: 'it' and 'the' and 'ilk' and see, here it even wrote 'tree'!"

But it is still a blind monkey.

a reply to: Wide-Eyes

Whoa!!!! Hold on a minute!!!!
Remember when he said those dirty words about women?!?! Wasn't it something like, "...grab em' by the...."???
How could a man really love this country when he speaks like that!!!

😉 2 years in and thats the worst they got on him!!!! A guy using dirty words!!!
Whether anyone likes it or not, Trump is the squeakiest clean president ever!

a reply to: skywatcher44


I don't understand how democrats can call him a traitor when they have knifed Americans in the back for 30 years now ever since Bill Clinton passed NAFTA. They are totally the party of open borders and globalization, to me that is treason. Who is a bigger traitor to this country, a president who wants to bring jobs back or one who wants to open our borders and send all the jobs he can overseas? That's the treason that matters to me.

If somebody could just tell me what, exactly Trump has done wrong for the US I would appreciate that.

I mean forget the fear factors of racism, communism, Russia , China, NATO...all those things that are intrinsically external...


What exactly has he done to agglomerate such massive (but seemingly specically focused) hatred and ire?

originally posted by: ForteanOrg
If you are convinced that a blind monkey can write proper English, you will put him behind a typewriter and wait. Eventually the monkey will hit just the right keys in the right order to form a few simple words sparsed between a lot of garbage. You can then point to these words and rightfully say: "you can talk all you want, but this is an intelligent creature that writes meaningful things, look here: 'it' and 'the' and 'ilk' and see, here it even wrote 'tree'!"

But it is still a blind monkey.

dsajdsfj wwe0ew-9re p'kjpoksdpfokasdf WTF kl;kd;fka;sdkf aklfksdfa;lkd 'pipipl;fdjk ARE lkasd';fkasd;lfka;dsfkk;'lk0-ew9o0- YOU ;lkfa;sdkf;'aksdf;kadf;kldaf TALKING a'ldf'asdf'aljdfads'fk';l ABOUT ?

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Many Republicans were against Obama during his term. But unlike the progressive left's stance on Trump we didn't want him dead .

originally posted by: 14377
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Many Republicans were against Obama during his term. But unlike the progressive left we didn't want him dead .

Speak for Yourself.................)

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

I said "many". ;-)

a reply to: chr0naut

I think it's more like 11 countries, but that doesn't include those that have kept their nuclear strike capability secret from the general public (like Australia, Belgium, Canada, Greece, Italy, The Netherlands & Turkey). 

I can't imagine those nations could utilize those weapons as they see fit. My point was aimed more at first strike capability, there's really only a handful of nations with the weapons, systems and hardware truly capable of a first strike without notice.

It isn't easy to track submarines though but then again for some it isn't necessarily hard... Depth and reach will always be key as is loiter time.

Two, actually, China and India. 

In my hypothetical China is with Russia, my point being that they wouldn't be able to steamroll over a nation like India.

Except the US and Russia, all other nuclear armed countries have less than 400 devices, which is probably too few to disable enough US defenses to make any attack winnable. 

Enough to make the US unlivable, and yes most of the nuclear powers officially have between 50-300 active nucleus weapons. My choice of 600 was based on the fact that many nations would react at once, some even collectively.

Besides, really, who wants their stuff anyway, especially if it would be all nuclear/bio/chemo 'dirty'? 

Precisely.

It's "end game" stuff really, uncharted territory where no side is aiming to win or conquer. Annihilation.

a reply to: Jonjonj

What exactly has he done to agglomerate such massive (but seemingly specically focused) hatred and ire?

The only thing I can think of is he being the only President I know of that is actually enforcing our border laws. Other then that I have no idea where this blind hatred is coming from.

a reply to: Chance321

Then you simply choose not to see it..he is a self aggrandizing dick, his PERSONALITY, personality is usually what endears you to someone..or not.

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: Chance321

Then you simply choose not to see it..he is a self aggrandizing dick, his PERSONALITY, personality is usually what endears you to someone..or not.

The only thing I see is that he isn't butt kissing like the past presidents and politicians, I see someone who's rough around the edges.

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: Chance321

Then you simply choose not to see it..he is a self aggrandizing dick, his PERSONALITY, personality is usually what endears you to someone..or not.

And that may be the reason he was elected. Sometimes people want someone to act like a prick. He may have gotten the job because he acts like an a-hole as i said all this stuff was known before he was elected. No one is surprised he's a jerk it was common knowledge. Also, no one is surprised he slept with porn stars etc again also common knowledge. I blame decades of politically correct garbage which lead to the perfect storm were people elected someone just because he wasn't like everyone else. So now we have probably the least qualified president in history because hes not a politician. And not being a politician he makes huge mistakes such as hiring the wrong people. The ones that were qualified were the never Trumpers.

a reply to: dragonridr

Yes, I do understand all that, I'm sure the same people who dislike him now, disliked him before the election. My point was to anyone out there puzzled as to why people dislike/hate him..to me it's somewhat obvious, he is not very likeable on many levels. This is personality wise.
As far as policy, he has done some good things, he also has he done things many people do not like..between the 2(personality and policy) it not too hard to understand why he is not liked.
JM2C

a reply to: Chance321

I think it's a bit more problematic than "rough around the edges" but that's just my take on it. It's all good, we're all are free to see things differently.