It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Blue Shift
It seems you missed the part where we underscored the fact that "great" doesnt inherently mean "good".
I recall many moons ago, someone of some degree of prominence mentioned in passing that Osama Bin Laden was a "great man", and Republican voter types went completely ballistic as if dude said he was a 'GOOD man', and that became the "big story", which of course was hell bent on disregarding the actual definition of "great".
originally posted by: DictionaryOfExcuses
a reply to: roadgravel
Preposterous. The two numbers are right there in front of you: 10%, 10%.
originally posted by: BiffWellington
Depends on what you mean by "great". It's certainly been less than great to a lot of people both inside and outside its borders throughout its history. Of course it's been great for some people. Not so much for, say, American slaves, citizens of third-world dictatorships whose rulers were cozy with American business, and the residents of Hiroshima.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
I guess that’s true. We were “great” at slavery. We were “great” at treating women like second class citizens. We were “great” at forcing homosexuals to live a life of secrecy in the closet. We were “great” at our mistreatment of Japanese American citizens during WWII.
Great doesn’t necessarily mean good. Do we really want to be “great” again?
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: BiffWellington
Depends on what you mean by "great". It's certainly been less than great to a lot of people both inside and outside its borders throughout its history. Of course it's been great for some people. Not so much for, say, American slaves, citizens of third-world dictatorships whose rulers were cozy with American business, and the residents of Hiroshima.
Dang , what Century is your reality based in ?
Or what Universe in the Multiverse ?
Sure ain't this one. Slave days have well been over and WW 2 ended some time ago.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
I guess that’s true. We were “great” at slavery. We were “great” at treating women like second class citizens. We were “great” at forcing homosexuals to live a life of secrecy in the closet. We were “great” at our mistreatment of Japanese American citizens during WWII.
Great doesn’t necessarily mean good. Do we really want to be “great” again?
Yep . Everyone grows wise by looking at their mistakes...
The US as well
All that was put to rest
What Century do you live in ?
originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: Blue Shift
Too bad the US often uses these weapon to make enemies.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
I guess that’s true. We were “great” at slavery. We were “great” at treating women like second class citizens. We were “great” at forcing homosexuals to live a life of secrecy in the closet. We were “great” at our mistreatment of Japanese American citizens during WWII.
Great doesn’t necessarily mean good. Do we really want to be “great” again?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: BiffWellington
Depends on what you mean by "great". It's certainly been less than great to a lot of people both inside and outside its borders throughout its history. Of course it's been great for some people. Not so much for, say, American slaves, citizens of third-world dictatorships whose rulers were cozy with American business, and the residents of Hiroshima.
Dang , what Century is your reality based in ?
Or what Universe in the Multiverse ?
Sure ain't this one. Slave days have well been over and WW 2 ended some time ago.
So, in what century was American great for everyone? What century do we want to model to make it “great again”?