Unite the Right 2018

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: WarPig1939
One group has a permit, the other group does not. I can tell which side is going to be the one to start some sh^&.

I betting my money on Antifa to help instigate a fight that will lead to a mass arrest on both sides.

I hate leftists

Oh hey, here's a guy who think's the Nazi's are actually the peaceful good guys.....

And you must one of those who thinks everyone who doesn’t agree with you is a nazi.

No, again I state this very VERY simply. If you side with nazis, that makes you a nazi sympathizer. Its FACT that UTR is made up of white nationalists and Neo-nazis. There is NO wiggle room here for you or anyone who sides with nazis. It has nothing to do with my opinions or who agree's with me, it has everything to do with folks who actually are siding with nazis.

Simple minded folk usually blab about simple minded ideas.

Yeah but do you have anything to say about my post though?

a reply to: seeker1963

Among the far-right groups engaged in organizing the march were the Stormer Book Clubs (SBCs) of the neo-Nazi news website The Daily Stormer, The Right Stuff, the National Policy Institute, and four groups that form the Nationalist Front: the neo-Confederate League of the South, the neo-Nazi groups Traditionalist Worker Party, Vanguard America, and the National Socialist Movement.

All of them are white supremacist organizations. Except for League of the South they're all neo-Nazi organizations. But keep telling us how it's wrong to refer to UTR attendees as Nazis.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: WarPig1939

UTR started the violence last year. They are the ones that fired a gun in to a crowd. They are the ones that trapped people in a church. And they are the ones that drive a car into a crowd.

Why do you think the Nazis will be better behaved this year?

Are you claiming the "nice man" with the torch trying to set others on fire had nothing to do with a shot being fired?

a reply to: Grimpachi


ah, but what provoked the guy from lighting the torch???
search out the court documents if you wish to know the answer!!!

Preston had argued at an October court proceeding that he drew his weapon when one man seemed to be on the verge of throwing a newspaper box at him and another looked like he was going to attack him with a large nail-laden stick, according to the Daily Progress newspaper. He said he fired because one of his friends felt threatened after Long turned his aerosol can into a makeshift flamethrower.

On Tuesday, Joseph D. Platania, the Charlottesville commonwealth’s attorney, told the judge that a witness saw Preston point his gun toward the ground beside Long at a 45-degree angle and then heard a gunshot. The witness, Platania told the court, would have testified at trial that the flames from Long’s aerosol can were not close to anyone.

Platania also said prosecutors did not believe anything about the incident would “justify the discharge of a firearm in self-defense.”


Link

a reply to: dawnstar

Before anything went to the lawyers the guy with the torch claimed on TV he was defending some old guy from a gun with his torch.

Video shows he tried to set people on fire before the gun came out.

I believe what I can see you can believe whatever.

BTW your link is broke.

a reply to: Grimpachi
link was broke, fixed now...

this should be good ... its really worth the time and money to buy some good popcorn we all know the microwave stuff isent the same remember u need flavacol or it just wont taste like the real thing

a reply to: dawnstar

Thanks for fixing it unfortunately its a pay site.

If no one was convicted the reason is probably that the police would have to charge both of them and the tape shows the torch guy attacking not defending and the guy that fired a shot could legally claim he was defending. Hell, I am surprised he fired a warning shot.

Here is another angle And it doesn't show flamethrower guy defending anyone.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: introvert

Their hatred and bigotry still remains.

Pot meet kettle.

It's amazing that after all these years you still have troubles formulating a decent rebuttal.

You are no longer a teenager, Neo.

The "I know you are but what am I" approach doesn't work anymore.

a reply to: Grimpachi

well, try this one...

www.baltimoresun.com...

a reply to: introvert

When someone throws around the word BIGOT.

It surly does.

Can't use it without being one.

a reply to: dawnstar

Thanks.

They were both charged.

WS guy pleaded no contest which is surprising. It probably has more to do with him leaving after. If he had stayed there I bet his lawyers would advise differently.

I still believe that if you don’t want to get hurt or killed don’t attend. None of the people that attend these rally’s are innocent. I don’t feel sorry for anyone that is too stupid to avoid this event. All you have to do is NOT GO.

This is a clash of extremist ideologies. Let them kill each other. If you go and get caught in the crossfire then enjoy your Darwin Award.

originally posted by: Metallicus
I still believe that if you don’t want to get hurt or killed don’t attend. None of the people that attend these rally’s are innocent. I don’t feel sorry for anyone that is too stupid to avoid this event. All you have to do is NOT GO.

This is a clash of extremist ideologies. Let them kill each other. If you go and get caught in the crossfire then enjoy your Darwin Award.

That's the very thing many said about that woman that got ran over last year.

She was there to protest ignorance, bigotry and hatred.

She was ran over. She died.

But she was dumb enough to go out there and received her Darwin award in exchange...right?

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: introvert

When someone throws around the word BIGOT.

It surly does.

Can't use it without being one.

What?

Can't use it without being one?

Maybe you are a teenager.

a reply to: introvert

: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

www.merriam-webster.com...

Example OF:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Back to Anderson Cooper.

a reply to: neo96

Sure, Neo. You win.

I knew better to engage you and I normally avoid doing so because of things like this.

It's utter stupidity and you beat me with experience.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: neo96

Sure, Neo. You win.

I knew better to engage you and I normally avoid doing so because of things like this.

It's utter stupidity and you beat me with experience.

Example OF:

1 : patronizing attitude or behavior

www.merriam-webster.com...

Are we done yet?

originally posted by: WarPig1939
One group has a permit, the other group does not. I can tell which side is going to be the one to start some sh^&.

I betting my money on Antifa to help instigate a fight that will lead to a mass arrest on both sides.

I hate leftists

LOL Wait, and it's okay to hate leftists or specifically antifa, but....you don't hate nazis and the far right? Hmmmm

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: introvert

: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

www.merriam-webster.com...

Example OF:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Back to Anderson Cooper.

Wha? White Nationalists are now a racial or ethnic group? Since when?