TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -73N-

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: CoramDeo

Your post might have given me an epiphany.

Are FIREWALLS = MARRIAGES?

On the basis of laws about testifying against your husband/wife? Not v clear on US law but this seems to make sense if that is the case.

Good observation. That makes a lot of sense.

Marital Privilege

The Supreme Court has recognized two types of marital privileges:

Testimonial privilege
Communications privilege

If I copy and paste any more I'll be copying and pasting the whole page.

a reply to: CoramDeo

The communications privilege is most interesting, CoramDeo!

In both criminal and civil cases, communications between spouses during the marriage are privileged. This applies to both words and acts intended to be a private communication. The burden is on the opposing party to prove that particular words and acts were not intended as private communication.

So black hats would have been thinking "All the dodgy conversations can't be used because they were between husband and wife"... but Q keeps trolling "WE HAVE IT ALL!" (paraphrased). So Q is saying "we have recordings of those conversations and can prove they were work/state related rather than private husband/wife communications"?

a reply to: butcherguy

The second movie is starting

Didn't anyone pick up on what Trump said during the speech about fake news?

I think he said Fake news is better than being silenced. It was Kinda odd.

I'm gonna go back and check it out.

So Weiner gets 21 months for solciting sex with a minor and child porn and Cohen gets 5 yrs. for paying off a blackmailer ? Ugh..... Manafort guilty, Flynn sentance post-poned for a 4th time ! IDK, I think POTUS should pardon them all after they serve the time " appropriate " for thier crimes. Not a day longer then scumbag Weiner !

I missed most of the rally tonight, but did you guys think his comment about putting Countries in ( ) that rip off America was a nod to Q ? I totally understand why Q needs to stay on the down-low for now, remember this mess took a LONG time to make...lol....Rome wasn't un-built in a day !

does anyone know how to turn on spell check ? I can't figure it out on this computer ?

originally posted by: Quadrivium
Wonder why Trump is distancing himself/party from Q.
It just seems that way. No where near the Q we have seen in the crowd before and Q post being censored in the chat.....

I've said for the past 5 months that the President should not acknowledge Q in any way. Q shares what could be classified information.

This need to prove to the masses that Trump/Q are connected is not wise. For Q to want the press to ask Sarah Sanders or the President about him/her/them, blows my mind.

a reply to: carewemust

it's a military person former or current I know that for sure

originally posted by: liveandlearn
On another subject, I had concern that Cohan's admission that Trump had ordered the money to pay off Stormy come out of campaign funds concerned me until I saw this.

the right scope

“When the FEC wrote the regulation that says what constitutes campaign expenditures and what constitutes personal use, it rejected specifically the idea that a campaign expenditure was anything related to a campaign, and instead says it has to be something that exists only because of the campaign and solely for that reason.”

In other words, the request for money by Daniels was because he was running for President and he used campaign funds to prevent damage.

There is a video at the link where Mark Levin has a former FEC chair explain why this is not a concern. (not on youtube)
First 3-5 minutes explains.

I was just reading about this. Levin is saying that, notwithstanding the guilty plea, the payments were not campaign contributions.

Cohen's lawyer set him up. I remember Lanny Davis. He's a Clinton-family dirtbag, and Cohen must have been nuts to rely on him!

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: carewemust

POTUS was 17 when JFK was shot!

ETA - 17years, 5 months, 8 days to be more exact. (I think someone may have mentioned it before).

JFK DOD = Nov 22nd 1963
DJT DOB = Jun 14th 1946

I noticed this before. It is fascinating.

I think that Trump may have had a great deal to do with the plan going back this far.

Interestingly, the movie 'From Russia With Love' was released on 10th October 1963 ... and ... was the first time Q was mentioned in the James Bond universe.

So ... millionaire playboy watches a movie ... perhaps POTUS should tweet who he took to the movie. That would be a great tweet ... top tweet ... bestest tweet.

A whole group of people DJT included ... sitting around ... wondering what to call the operation ... and 17 year old DJT laughs and says "call it Q". Possibly the rest is history.

Mr Donald J Trump ... please tweet who you took to the movies to see With Russia With Love.

Synchronicity at its driest or well planned.

Past proves present.

Just my thoughts.

P

The relevant portion begins at 1:26.03 - 1:27.15

listen to that for 1 minute and 15 seconds

a reply to: pheonix358

not sure that's connected to reality I think some of these theories are beyond reasonable

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: CoramDeo

The communications privilege is most interesting, CoramDeo!

In both criminal and civil cases, communications between spouses during the marriage are privileged. This applies to both words and acts intended to be a private communication. The burden is on the opposing party to prove that particular words and acts were not intended as private communication.

So black hats would have been thinking "All the dodgy conversations can't be used because they were between husband and wife"... but Q keeps trolling "WE HAVE IT ALL!" (paraphrased). So Q is saying "we have recordings of those conversations and can prove they were work/state related rather than private husband/wife communications"?

So that priviledge would be applicable if say a husband confessed to his wife that he killed his business partner while deep sea fishing, and it wasn't an accident. The police suspect as much due to circumstancial evidence, but the wife knows for sure because of the admission of guilt in a private conversation. The wife could not be compelled to testify against the husband, but she could wave that right and testify anyway.

In the case of a hsuband an wife couple like Buce and Nell-Y Ohr, the same would apply. With respect to firewalls, if they think this priviledge is going to protect them, Q alluding to haing all of the conversations would be Q saying that the firewall is broken. The testimony doesn't matter, we don't need it to prove guilt.

Whether the conversation is personal, or at work, I would think the privilege to not testify against a spouse still stands. I could be wrong on that, but I can't imagine that it wouldn't still apply. I believe it still applies to a man and wife who are business partners, so something said in the course of government work, I would imagine, carries the same privilege.

The important part is the broken firewall.

So how many wives,or vice versa, employed by the government or not, have acted as the go-between in attempts to subvert the law with the intent to erect a "firewall"?

Interesting, and very astute observation on your part, Rel.

He also puts the NATO leaders in brackets

Relevant portion 1:16.15 -1:16.30

a reply to: MountainLaurel

PM'd you, but please disregard.

I forgot about my uber safety precautions, so I can't vouch fo the link.

My apologies.

I sent a second message with just instructions.

a reply to: CoramDeo

Didn't you guys figure this out when Huma didn't divorce Weiner?
Not to be condescending but I thought it Quite obvious.

You know if you think about it, that was the when the deep state was really taking a hit. Since then they have really turned the heat up on Trump. I believe there next card is being played and it is a dirty one and it will probably affect most of us.

We who follow Q, support Trump, want justice from those that have broken our laws, are on the other side of facebook,Twitter,Google ETC.

They can shut you down. They are doing it now. Right now it's your opinion on politics. Tomorrow it could be your website or your email.

How many of us small business owners rely on the internet for our livelihood?

What price are you willing to pay?

ETA , It also occurred to me, that whatever this second movie is about, it is going to happen no matter what. It doesn't matter if Trump loses the house, it doesn't matter who gets convicted.

The 45,000 sealed indictments are gonna be served and all hell is gonna breakloose.

Or, we are screwed.

a reply to: Aallanon

Didn't you guys figure this out when Huma didn't divorce Weiner?
Not to be condescending but I thought it Quite obvious.

Oh yes, or why Bill and Hill maintain a dead marriage. Marital priviledge among other things.

What price are you willing to pay?

They can try and shut me down, but I have an set of keys that opens paths not available to most people.

a reply to: Aallanon

Their rights to run a business cannot and must not infringe on your right to freedom of speech.

Their rights start where mine stop.

They cannot infringe on my rights to freedom of speech. They set themselves up to give people a way for their voices to be heard and then ... when they are big behemoths ... they say our business / our rules.

Yes it is your business but ... you cannot stifle my rights to freedom of speech to simply align with your political biases.

If you do ... then register as a political hack organization because that is what they are.

P

a reply to: CoramDeo

I may need a little help. lol

a reply to: carewemust

He never suggested we should ask Sarah or even Trump. He simply states, "who's the one person who can" why won't they? Because it would force Q to explain all the things he's going on about. They (media/deep state) don't want that. He's just trolling.



There's more in this video than meets the eye.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi


Thank-you for responding.

Perhaps:
The JFK assassination "solidified something" in the mind of 17 year-old Donald Trump.
Therefore, President Trump chose Q as the "title" for his information dissiminator, because Q is the 17th letter of the alphabet.

Hopefully we'll know all the details one day.